Sentences with phrase «cycle models do»

Professor Friedlingstein, who is an expert in global carbon cycle studies added: «Current land carbon cycle models do not show this increase over the last 50 years, perhaps because these models underestimate emerging drought effects on tropical ecosystems.»

Not exact matches

The relationship between monetary policy and financial stability may depend on the specific economic conditions in which we find ourselves.6 Moreover, the processes resulting in financial cycles, with periods of unsustainable debt buildup, occasional crises and periods of deleveraging, are not well captured by standard models.7 We have more work to do before we can be fully confident about our conclusions.

We model your current holdings as though they become fully paid today — we don't consider the future repayment cycle of your holdings

And that's before accounting for some of the factors that the model doesn't consider: the disagreement in the polls, the unusual nature of Trump's candidacy and the demographic changes it is producing, Clinton's superior turnout operation, the possibility of «shy Trump» voters, the fact that the news cycle is still somewhat fluid headed into the final weekend, the declining response rates to polls, and the substantial number of high - profile polling misses around the world over the past few years.

An electoral - cycle cycle based forecasting model did much better than the polls in Britain in 2015, but so too did citizen forecasts (see here).

More computer modeling should be done first, he adds, to determine how injected particles might interact with the ozone layer and the hydrologic cycle.

Though the scientists don't know if such individual and pack behavior is a common occurrence, observations like these on Isle Royale provide insight into how animal societies function as well as the vicissitudes of the food chain cycle on Isle Royale, also helping to inform other models of the natural world.

Regional trends are notoriously problematic for models, and seems more likely to me that the underprediction of European warming has to do with either the modeled ocean temperature pattern, the modelled atmospheric response to this pattern, or some problem related to the local hydrological cycle and boundary layer moisture dynamics.

General circulation models have generally excluded the feedback between climate and the biosphere, using static vegetation distributions and CO2 concentrations from simple carbon - cycle models that do not include climate change6.

The question of whether accelerated carbon sinks on land can turn to accelerated carbon sources is something a lot of terrestrial carbon cycle modellers are interested in, but I couldn't give you an accurate read on the state of the art there, except that some models do show the land sink turning into a land source given sufficient warming.

The models are not tuned to these events (most «tweaking» is done to match the climatologies, seasonal cycles and diurnal cycles instead) and so they provide a good validation of the models.

It was short to be able to put a six - year cycle plan together, to work out what you're going to do with the brand, to work out what the business model looks like and then to go fund it, it was tight.

While the relatively small power bump and large list of (heavy) standard features is not too exciting for the purist, we do look forward to feeling the chassis changes given Aston's impressive history of fine - tuning their cars throughout the model cycle.

We did fairly recently get a new 2016 Kia Optima, and that is certainly an attractive car, but Kia will be rolling out several new cars in the immediate future as existing models reach the ends of their production cycles.

«The 4 - series doesn't just mark the start of a new cycle; it marks the start of a model with its own individual character and a stand - alone design,» says BMW.

But no matter what Toyota decides to do, the Avensis will still be around for around 18 months, until the third - generation model ends its life cycle.

Even for a conservative company like Volvo, 11 years was a long wait, as in the same time span some Japanese carmakers would have covered three model cycles, and even the Germans would have done two.

Being the fastest power - operated retractable hardtop in the U.S (12 seconds for opening and closing cycles), the retractable hardtop model which does not impact affect trunk space is available to only Touring and Grand Touring series, whereas the soft top model is available in all three series.

The big differences are underneath: The hi - spec Highlander comes with a 130kW / 265Nm direct - injection 1.6 - litre turbo four where the Active makes do with the 110kW / 180Nm aspirated, Atkinson cycle 2.0 - litre Nu engine already familiar in Hyundai Elantra models where it produces slightly higher 112kW / 192Nm outputs.

That doesn't match the 15,484 examples of the more family - friendly, three - row Toyota Highlander sold during the same period, but it's respectable for a vehicle that's eight years into its current model cycle, with bones far older than that.

If we take into consideration the fact that the NEFZ driving cycle favours the hybrid models, we do believe that in daily conditions, the X5 is more economical as it should be, without delivering the same dynamics as Mercedes - Benz or Porsche: It reaches 100 km / h in 6.8 seconds with a maximum speed of 210 km / h.

If two years of generational updates on Nexus class devices can be considered the norm and not the exception, then Android manufacturers still have a long way to go in terms of long - term device support, especially with the current wave of 9 - month flagship cycles that are doing more harm to the current perception of Android as many 2011 and 2012 flagships outside of recently announced models have yet to receive promised updates.

In that sense all analysis of stock market based on historical metrics do nt make much sense since composition of stocks is entirely different in different era and as more capital efficient business model evolve and their time to market cycle shrinks stocks likely to command higher valuations and suddenly lower valuations during short period of time like already happening for many technology companies and as influence of technology on overall cost structure of companies increases (for example: robotics replace many of employees cost etc) valuation matrix of most companies likely to get affected dynamically in short duration of time than in the past.

In this case, if your models of macroeconomics can't accommodate the boom / bust cycle, you don't deserve to be an economist.

Economic: What stocks do you own which have businesses (and / or business models) which are less correlated, or even uncorrelated, with the economic cycle?

I don't particularly like these business models, as they tend to produce mediocre returns on capital over the full cycle, but occasionally they do offer opportunities to buy them well below their net asset values.

«The triple - A publishing model goes in cycles, sort of, but it doesn't really serve developers like us very well, mid-size developers... you're not fully in control of your destiny.

How it did in court is anyone's guess, but basing the cycles on real models probably didn't help.

YOU HAVE BROKEN THE SONIC CYCLE AND GLORY IS UPON SONIC»S NAME!!!!!!! I don't care about the model!

Proposed explanations for the discrepancy include ocean — atmosphere coupling that is too weak in models, insufficient energy cascades from smaller to larger spatial and temporal scales, or that global climate models do not consider slow climate feedbacks related to the carbon cycle or interactions between ice sheets and climate.

General circulation models have generally excluded the feedback between climate and the biosphere, using static vegetation distributions and CO2 concentrations from simple carbon - cycle models that do not include climate change6.

To Stefan: The ability to construct simple non-chaotic phenomenological models that «explain» D - O events or Milankovich cycle doesn't prove that the events are not chaotic in their nature.

I'll be happy for someone to clarify this but don't the models run through a succession of time cycles for a number of defined «columns» of the atmosphere — so isn't there a chance that a small initial error could accumulate.

These models do not include the major carbon cycle feedbacks, which only exacerbate the temperature rise, and bring potential extinction closer in time.

The question of whether accelerated carbon sinks on land can turn to accelerated carbon sources is something a lot of terrestrial carbon cycle modellers are interested in, but I couldn't give you an accurate read on the state of the art there, except that some models do show the land sink turning into a land source given sufficient warming.

What the skeptics have really done so far is use simple models to observe the «missing sink,» which other carbon cycle modelers discovered and named years ago (and more or less attributed to NH terrestrial biosphere).

What this model shows is that if orbital variations in insolation impact ice sheets directly in any significant way (which evidence suggests they do Roe (2006)-RRB-, then the regression between CO2 and temperature over the glacial - interglacial cycles (which was used in Snyder (2016)-RRB- is a very biased (over) estimate of ESS.

Re # 128, CGMs do not currently include the carbon cycle, so your concern is not with the models as they now exist but with the uncertainties of the forcings which are applied to them.

Reconstructing ancient carbon cycles is really hard to do and once again climate models using the best available proxy data are our best bet.

The model may be right over the full 131 year period, but in this case doesn't reflect natural cycles including El Nino and longer cycles (as is the case for ocean warming, where models — significantly — don't reflect any cycle with a length between 10 - 100 years).

That said, the CGCM 21st century projections (IPCC scenario runs) typically used in policy discussions do not include a coupled carbon cycle model, though many people seem to think that they do.

(Wentz et al., 2007 inferred a stronger - than - modeled hydro cycle, but I don't see that work in the references.)

Do the latest model simuations by The Max Planck Institute for Meteorology in Hamburg include the carbon cycle?

I know in general terms that the hydrological cycle should intensify with warming and that one event is hard to pin on climate change, but it would be good to do a catch up on how the broad trend of extreme weather fits the models.

Let's look at something a little later, something done in preperation for AR4 — plans testing the incorporation of the carbon cycle into climate models.

I reply that I can not because I need the CO2 and CH4 natural cycle mechanism models that I nor you do have.

The models are not tuned to these events (most «tweaking» is done to match the climatologies, seasonal cycles and diurnal cycles instead) and so they provide a good validation of the models.

Finally I attempt a suggestion that perhaps one solution to the problem that the solar impact on climate is underestimated by models might be because EBM and GCM, like GISS, do not contain CO2 and CH4 cycle mechanisms that might be partially effected by the Sun, and other mechanisms are missing or uncertain (water vapor, cloud cover, vegetation, bacteria respiration, UV radiation, cosmic ray effects etc.).

About the CO2 effect, I did not do any real calculations, I simply suggest that the model should contain the CO2 and CH4 cycle mechanisms and many other mechanisms to be correctly interpreted.

2) the model should include carbon cycle mechanisms and methan cycle mechanisms to be realistic, and it does not.