And, this result was nearly always accomplished by each entity systematically removing the previously existing
cyclical temperature pattern.
The Second Supplement to Petition states: Adjustments that impart an ever - steeper upward trend in the data by removing the natural
cyclical temperature patterns present in the data deprive the GAST products from NOAA, NASA and Hadley CRU of the credibility required for policymaking or climate modeling, particularly when they are relied on to drive trillions of dollars in expenditures.
In fact, the report says, «the magnitude of their historical data adjustments, that removed
their cyclical temperature patterns, are totally inconsistent with published and credible U.S. and other temperature data.
Not exact matches
Despite their considerable differences, the atmospheres of Earth, Jupiter, and Saturn all display a remarkably similar phenomenon in their equatorial regions: vertical,
cyclical, downwards - moving
patterns of alternating
temperatures and wind systems that repeat over a period of multiple years.
The
temperatures we experience locally and in short periods can fluctuate significantly due to predictable
cyclical events (night and day, summer and winter) and hard - to - predict wind and precipitation
patterns.
Its as if someone started of with the premise that the fluctuations seen in annual
temperature averages follow a
cyclical pattern.
AS you travel the state, what are the biggest misperceptions you hear from climate skeptics who often say these changes are the result of the
cyclical nature of our planet's
temperature patterns?
As I look at the global mean
temperature trend for the 20th century, I see a
cyclical pattern as shown in the following graph.
The winds are created from high and low pressure cells, and that's all caused from
temperature differences related to the suns energy «influence» on the oceans / land and
cyclical weather
patterns.
Climate change is the change in weather
pattern due to natural, periodic and
cyclical swings in
temperatures such as the ice age which covers a much longer period of time usually for thousands of years.
It is likely that the criticism I posted in reply is valid in response to yours as well: that the departure from the secular
cyclical pattern appears in the land record but not the sea surface
temperatures.
It takes 100 years of
temperature data, and matches to it a 60 - year
cyclical pattern.
There are a number of inter-decadal and multi-decadal
cyclical patterns observable in the climate system, particularly in ocean surface
temperatures.
There is a
cyclical pattern to the estimated cross correlations, yet this is to be expected (e.g. Chapter 12, [27]-RRB- because of the very pronounced
cyclical pattern in the autocorrelation function of
temperature (Fig. 4A).
This could perhaps be the identification of
cyclical patterns in the
temperature records that explain recent warming, the GCR experiments, an unkown feedback (or the full understanding of clouds, removing their possibility as a positive feedback as described by thr IPCC) or something else.