«Surely, if reasonable people saw the choice between the risk of
a daffodil gene in a rice plant and the certainty of millions of blind children, they would descend on Greenpeace offices around the world and demand to have their money back,» he wrote.
Not exact matches
The breakthrough was achieved by replacing a
gene originally borrowed from
daffodils, and which also has a counterpart from maize.
Seven years later, they found three
genes — one from a bacterium and two from a
daffodil — that programmed the plant to produce beta - carotene, a precursor of vitamin A.
The
genes for b - carotene are clearly not the ones that generate any poison from
daffodils.
Daffodils are poisonous, so why use
genes from
daffodil when there are so many edible sources of carotene producing
genes?
Daffodils may well be poisonous, (I never tried them), but
genes are not.