Sentences with phrase «damage for motor vehicles»

Physical damage for motor vehicles, including motorcycles, is usually covered under comprehensive or collision insurance.

Not exact matches

This special extension to British Cycling's motor vehicle insurance arrangements is «comprehensive» (i.e. not «third party») in the event of a road traffic incident only and does not provide insurance cover for property or vehicle damage claims arising, for example, from the use of radio and other event equipment or where a motorcycle has fallen to the ground from a stationary position.

I would not think it very likely to have damaged the starter motor, but it's possible some vehicles use a common fusible link for the starter and alternator.

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety or IIHS was formed in 1959 with and its main aim is to lower the number of motor vehicle accidents as well as the amount of injuries and property damage as a result of the vehicle crashes.

Two Brothers Motor Company, LLC assumes no responsibility for damages incurred after the vehicle leaves our dealership.

Notably, the department of revenue's Motor Vehicle Usage Tax site does not have a form to request a refund of the usage tax, except for very specific reasons (mostly having to do with damage to the veVehicle Usage Tax site does not have a form to request a refund of the usage tax, except for very specific reasons (mostly having to do with damage to the vehiclevehicle).

Martha Voss, spokeswoman for Toyota Motor North America Inc. in Washington, says such changes void the vehicle warranty and damage the electronic controls in the «elegantly engineered» vehicle.

After finding petitioner Honda Motor Co., Ltd., liable for injuries respondent Oberg received while driving a three - wheeled all - terrain vehicle manufactured and sold by Honda, an Oregon jury awarded Oberg $ 5 million in punitive damages, over five times the amount of his compensatory damages award.

We represent individuals and professionals, municipalities and their agencies, business entities, trucking companies, insurers and their insureds from claims and lawsuits for catastrophic losses and personal injuries, civil rights, construction losses and contracts, employment related practices, property damage and wrongful death arising from the transportation function and commercial motor vehicle activity; the ownership, use and control of land (including environmentally related or toxic exposure claims); the design, manufacture, sale or use of industrial and consumer products; and liability claims against licensed professionals, including lawyers, engineers, accountants and architects, in the States of Pennsylvania and New Jersey.

Under Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 90, Section 24, it is illegal for someone not to stop and provide his or her information following a motor vehicle collision in Massachusetts where there is property damage or personal injury.

627.730 - 627.7405, or against any person or organization legally responsible for her or his acts or omissions, a plaintiff may recover damages in tort for pain, suffering, mental anguish, and inconvenience because of bodily injury, sickness, or disease arising out of the ownership, maintenance, operation, or use of such motor vehicle only in the event that the injury or disease consists in whole or in part of: (a) Significant and permanent loss of an important bodily function.

In addition, Act 133 changes from six years to the three years the statute of limitations for claims for damage to real or personal property arising from a motor vehicle accident.

The act retains the six - year statute of limitations for claims for damage to real or personal property not arising from a motor vehicle accident.

Where the person who causes a motor vehicle accident is acting within the course and scope of employment, or is driving a company vehicle, there is potential for recovery of damages not only against the negligent driver, but also against the employer.

Following a motor vehicle accident the insurance declarations for benefits and other remarks, including announcements on social media, made by claimants can form part of the overall evidence respecting a claim for damages and losses.

Reasons for judgement were released today by the BC Supreme Court, Vancouver Registry, assessing damages for soft tissue injuries from a motor vehicle collision.

Tires are not supposed to last forever, which is why replacing old, worn, or damaged tires is a crucial safety step for preventing high - speed blowouts and other tire failures that can cause a motor vehicle accident.

Many people suffering injuries in a motor vehicle accident are concerned that pre-existing injuries they may have had from previous motor vehicle accidents, for example, might reduce or perhaps negate any potential damage award that might be granted to them.

In December 2015, Kim Deshazo obtained a defense verdict for her client in a motor vehicle accident case in which both liability and damages were in question in Jefferson County, Alabama, in the matter of Marcus Maddox v. Jonathon Perry.

[1] The plaintiff, Rekha Chaube, seeks damages for injuries suffered in a motor vehicle collision that the defendants say never happened.

Until recently, ICBC has been very reluctant to pay anything for loss caused by depreciation on a vehicle damaged in a motor vehicle accident.

The proof of that future loss is sometimes a difficult task and usually involves medical assessment and / or actuarial assessment); d. past care cost (if you have spend money for your medical care that was made medically necessary owing to ICBC motor vehicle accident injury then you can expect to collect a sum of money equivalent to those reasonable treatment and medication costs please ensure that you keep the receipts and seek prior medical approval to eventually prove this loss); e. future care costs (if you will suffer repeated medical expenses in the future owing to your motor vehicle accident ICBC injury claim then you can collect a sum of money equivalent to that future loss); f. out of pocket expenses or «special damages» (if you suffer out of pocket expenses like for travel to / from medical appointments, cab fare, parking, etc, then this is also recoverable by you but again — keep track of these expenses in a log and keep a receipt book for later proof of this loss); g. legal costs (sum of the legal costs associated with advancing your injury claim are recoverable as the court system recognizes that often legal experts, lawyers and their agents are a necessary part of the process); h. other categories of damages: not discussed here are other categories of damages like «in trust claims» made largely for those who relatives who take care of you while you are recovering from your injuries or things like «loss of ability to enter an economically interdependent relationship» which might be awarded to a seriously disfigured potential spouse for his / her unlikely ability to become married in the future.

The victims of a New Mexico motor vehicle crash may be entitled to receive damages for their medical expenses, lost wages and benefits, pain and suffering, and any disability that resulted from the accident.

Most people involved in a motor vehicle accident understand that a deductible may apply to a claim for property damage.

And while automobile accident lawyers can assist injury victims in accessing compensation for the damages they have incurred, public safety would greatly benefit from a significant reduction in motor vehicle accidents.

In a case with a slightly unusual fact pattern where reasons for judgement were released today, a Plaintiff was awarded nearly $ 90,000 in damages as a result of a July, 2005 motor vehicle collision in Nanaimo, BC.

The client was a back seat passenger in a vehicle that was hit from the rear by another vehicle and hired the lawyer to pursue a claim for damages arising from the motor vehicle accident.

Reasons for judgement were released today by the BC Supreme Court, New Westminster Registry, assessing damages for facial scars following a tragic motor vehicle collision.

If your injuries were caused by a motor vehicle accident, you should understand that ICBC has settlement guidelines for soft tissue injuries that are capped at $ 15,000 for damages for pain and suffering, also known as «non-pecuniary damages».

The physical damage to a motor vehicle or any physically - damaged truck should be preserved to test for mechanical issues or known mechanical failures.

If you are hit by a motor vehicle while riding your bicycle, you may have an ICBC claim for «no fault» benefits, as well as a personal injury claim for damages.

The other driver either being convicted of or pleading guilty to a criminal offence, such as impaired driving, or a traffic offence, such as failure to stop at a stop sign, will go a long way to proving the liability (fault) of the other driver in causing the motor vehicle accident, and thus go a long way to proving their liability for your damages suffered.

Prior to joining Lipe Lyons, Ms. Abraham spent several years as a trial attorney for a Chicago based firm defending insurance carriers and their insureds in personal injury and property damage claims arising from motor vehicle collisions, as well as breach of contract and insurance coverage disputes.

In Moloney v Alberta (Administrator, Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Act), the Alberta government refused to issue a driver's licence to John Moloney because he has unpaid judgment for personal injury damages against him.

The three analogies: (1) whereas a pre-electronic paper record can be symbolized by a piece of paper in a file drawer, an electronic record is like a drop of water in a pool of water, i.e., it is completely dependent upon its ERMS for its existence, accessibility, and «integrity» (as that word is used in the electronic records provisions of the Evidence Acts; e.g. s. 31.2 (1)(a) CEA); (2) if expert opinion evidence were rendered admissible in the way that electronic records are, there would be no evidence presented, nor cross-examination allowed, as to the qualifications of the expert witnesses, i.e., the «qualifications» of an electronic record being the state of records management of the ERMS in which it is stored; (3) going from a horse - powered transportation system to a motor vehicle - based transportation system has required a vast amount of new laws, regulations, and enforcement personnel, including police officers, judges, and lawyers, i.e., stepping up to a new technology requires that it be controlled by new laws and regulations, otherwise it will cause injury, damage, and injustice.

As previously discussed, given the right circumstances a lawsuit for damages following a motor vehicle incident can succeed even if there is no impact between vehicles.

Reasons for judgement were released today awarding damages as a result of injuries and loss from a 2002 BC motor vehicle collision.

If you have been injured or one of your family members has been killed in a truck accident caused by driver negligence or a defect in the truck or one of the other motor vehicles involved, you may be able to recover financial compensation for the damages you or your family members have suffered as a result of your injuries or loved one's death.

If you are seriously injured in a motor vehicle collision, the at - fault party has two hundred thousand dollars in third part liability limits, and you do not have family protection coverage, there is a cap of two hundred thousand dollars for your damage, paid by the at - fault driver's insurance.

When filing a claim for damages, our experienced legal team will draw upon extensive knowledge of motor vehicle financial responsibility laws.

In motor vehicle accidents, the liable party's insurance company is responsible for damages.

Reasons for judgement were released this week by the BC Supreme Court, Vancouver Registry, assessing damages for a disabling conversion disorder following a motor vehicle collision.

At Mokaram Law Firm, our attorneys are dedicated to helping innocent families who suffer from severe motor vehicle accidents recover compensation for the damages they incur.

Section 267.5 (5) of the Insurance Act requires that in order to establish a claim for damages for pain and suffering relating to a motor vehicle accident, one must sustain a permanent, serious impairment of an important physical, mental or psychological function.

In Gormick v. Amenta, the Plaintiff had been injured in a motor vehicle accident, and was awarded damages for pain and suffering, out of pocket expenses, and loss of income, including loss of banked sick time.

Negligent motor vehicle drivers can be liable for all damages sustained as a result of the bike accident, including medical bills, lost wages, pain and suffering, and future disability.

In Combs v. Bergen, the Plaintiff was injured in a motor vehicle collision, and brought an ICBC claim against the Defendant for damages for pain and suffering, wage loss, diminished earning capacity, and cost of future.

In 2004, the insurance industry successfully lobbied the Alberta provincial government to «cap» damages payable to motor vehicle accident victims for minor injuries.

«Governmental agencies shall be liable for bodily injury and property damage resulting from the negligent operation by any officer, agent, or employee of the governmental agency, of a motor vehicle of which the governmental agency is owner

In order for there to be a viable tort action for damages or losses that were incurred as a result of a motor vehicle collision, the injured person must have sustained a permanent serious impairment of an important physical, mental or psychological function.