Sentences with phrase «damages in all member states»

Not exact matches

«It is quite simply disgusting that Nestlé and its colleagues are using economic blackmail against the Philippines in an attempt to force members of congress to accept a bill that the Department of Health, WHO and UNICEF have clearly stated will be damaging to Filipino society.

Gov. David A. Paterson called on every member of the state's public integrity commission to resign on Wednesday in the wake of a damaging report about the commission's handling of an investigation into his predecessor, Eliot Spitzer.

Now, U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz and other members of the Texas delegation are requesting federal assistance in the aftermath of Hurricane Harvey, which has caused widespread damage and flooding in Houston and other parts of the state.

Whereas a victory for the teachers and school service employees in West Virginia would greatly encourage teachers everywhere, including members of the Port Jefferson Station Teachers Association and the New York State United Teachers, to continue in our increasingly stronger efforts to combat damaging and abusive cuts in New York; and

The report released today by the Albany County District Attorney's Office confirms what I have been saying all along, that former Governor Eliot Spitzer lied to the people of this State about his direct knowledge and involvement in the Troopergate scandal; that he was obsessed with conducting a political «hit job» to damage me personally and politically; and that the administration enlisted favored members of the news media, principally The Albany Times - Union to carry out their plot.

Whereas a victory for Seattle teachers would greatly encourage teachers everywhere, including members of the Port Jefferson Station Teachers Association and the New York State United Teachers, to continue in our increasingly stronger efforts to combat damaging and abusive public education reforms in our own communities; and

Whereas a victory for the teachers and school service employees in West Virginia would greatly encourage teachers everywhere, including members of the Port Jefferson Station Teachers Association and the New York State United Teachers, to continue in our increasingly stronger efforts to combat damaging and abusive cuts in New York; and

An EC press statement said the «situation is creating serious distortions of competition that are damaging to economic operators in the other 25 member states».

Our best hope is the that the Fed and its member banks get so greedy that they cause major damage to the largest corporations, who then in turn lobby Congress to establish a Central Bank of the United States with a mandate to maintain price stability.

Miyamoto is a structural engineer from California (and a member of that state's Seismic Safety Commission), who has been in Katmandu since Tuesday and is helping «red tag» dangerous structures around the city — including a high - rise housing complex that was badly damaged but did not collapse, avoiding mass mortality.

For example, representatives of countries that are particularly vulnerable to the threat of loss and damage associated with the adverse effects of climate change, such as the members of the Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS), want to see greater representation of these countries in the decision - making body.

In Bolagsupplysningen OÜ, Ingrid Ilsjan v Svensk Handel AB (BOÜ / Ilsjan) the Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ) ruled that a legal person can bring an action for damages and request the correction and removal of allegedly defamatory information before the courts of the Member State where that person has its centre of interests.

Private parties that saw themselves burdened with unforeseen obligations as a consequence should start an action for damages against the Member State having incorrectly implemented the directive in question according to the Advocate General.

The party suffering a damage because of the incompatibility of national law with EU law could still start an action for damages against the Member State, as already indicated in the Dominguez case (para 50).

While the action for damages had been initially conceived to protect those having a subjective right to be enforced before national courts, a reasonable solution in the present situation could be that the party who had drawn a benefit from the implementing act contrary to EU law now would be required to carry the burden of undertaking the necessary steps of an action for damages against the Member State; this would appear more justified than to impose said burden on the party who possesses a right created through the concretisation of the content of a principle (para 79).

In other words, can anyone who suffers pecuniary damages start a successful Francovich procedure against a Member State for violation of the EIA Directive?

The former court has jurisdiction for the entirety of the damage suffered by the injured party, whereas the latter courts only have jurisdiction to rule on the injury suffered within the territory of the Member State in which the respective national court is located.

In this case, the Court granted jurisdiction to the national courts in which the website that contained injurious content was accessible, but only for the respective damage suffered in that Member State (so - called «mosaic» approachIn this case, the Court granted jurisdiction to the national courts in which the website that contained injurious content was accessible, but only for the respective damage suffered in that Member State (so - called «mosaic» approachin which the website that contained injurious content was accessible, but only for the respective damage suffered in that Member State (so - called «mosaic» approachin that Member State (so - called «mosaic» approach).

AG Bobek further points out, and thereby strengthening his arguments to limit the possible places of jurisdiction to two, that if 28 courts in as many Member States could be competent to hear the case for the respective damage caused in these Member States, all these courts could also order injunctions, which would most likely differ in nature and scope, and might, even worse, be contradictory (para. 130).

If the survival action is successful, the personal representative distributes the damage award to surviving family members as instructed by either the victim's will or, in the absence of one, by the state's laws of «interstate succession,» which are statutes that dictate how assets pass (and how much) when the person who dies has no will.

The European Commission issued a non-binding recommendation to EU Member States in June 2013 in respect of funding collective anti-trust damages cases.

The «Ruta» [2000] 1 Lloyd's Rep 359: Chris acted for the wages Claimants (not Defendants as stated in the report) in this action in which David Steel J. declined to follow a supposed rule set out in a number of text books and instead applied the Admiralty Court's wide equitable discretion so as to accord priority to the claims of unpaid crew members above the claims of the holders of damage maritime liens.

Kris has spoken at numerous legal seminars, including speaking engagements concerning «Motions in Limine: Protecting the Story» (Panel Member, NELA - GA / ICLE Trying Your Best: Employment Law Goes to Court Seminar, 2017), «Reductions in Force» (Professional Association Of Georgia Educators, 2012), «Settlement Agreements and Keeping the Deal» (State Bar of Georgia, General Practice and Trial Section, 2011), «Update on Employment Law» (General Practice And Trial Law Section Institute, 2011), «Employment Law in the Trenches» (General Practice and Trial Law Institute 2009), EEOC Atlanta 2008 Technical Assistance Program Seminar, «Firing Public Employees: Lessons Learned from the Perspective of Plaintiff and Defense Counsel» (Liability of Local Governments Seminar 2007), «Busting the Cap on Damages in Employment Litigation» (Managing Damages in Employment Litigation Seminar 2007), «State Law and Other Non-Traditional Claims: Crash Course, Questions to Ask, and New Developments» (Employment Law for the General Practitioner and for the Pros).

The Damages Directive, which was implemented in the United Kingdom in March 2017, provides that final decisions of national competition authorities (or review courts) in other member states may be presented before national courts as at least prima facie evidence that an infringement of competition law has occurred.

Acted successfully for the appellant Nuclear Decommissioning Authority in a landmark Supreme Court judgment establishing that damages in procurement claims are only available if any breach of duty is «sufficiently serious» within the meaning of the EU law conditions for Member State liability.

The court did not certify an entitlement to punitive and compensatory damages, but stated that liability in waiver of tort may be justified even without individual proof of loss by members in the class [para. 173].

Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (Appellant) v EnergySolutions EU Ltd (now called ATK Energy EU Ltd)[2017] UKSC 34 Acting successfully for the Appellant, the NDA, in a landmark Supreme Court judgment establishing that damages in procurement claims are not awarded as of right, but should only be available if any breach of duty that is established is «sufficiently serious» within the meaning of the EU law conditions for Member State liability (i.e. the well known Francovich / Factortame conditions).

It is to be expected that the potentially increased number of private damages litigations will allow the courts to fill in some gaps in the Bulgarian framework, following the extensive experience in such claims by other EU member states.

Choice of court being unlikely, next up is the application of Article 7 (1) to determine which court has jurisdiction to hear an application for damages relating to the termination of a commercial concession agreement concluded between two companies, each established and operating in a different Member State, for the marketing of goods on the domestic market of a third Member State in which neither of those companies has a branch or establishment.

The Damages Directive was adopted with the aim to facilitate obtaining compensation for infringements of EU or national competition law, by harmonizing relevant provisions in the EU Member States.

Uninsured motorist bodily injury insurance (UM or UMBI) covers you, the insured members of your household (resident relatives) and your passengers for bodily / personal injuries, damages, or death caused by an at - fault driver who doesn't have insurance (uninsured) or, in some states, by a hit - and - run or miss - and - run driver.