«Expect global cooling for the next 2 - 3 decades that will be far more
damaging than global warming would have been» By Marc Morano A prominent U.S. geologist is urging the world to forget about global warming because global cooling has already begun.
Not exact matches
It will be cheaper, they tell us, to adjust to increased storm
damage, build more dikes and seawalls, relocate people and pay the costs of increased air - conditioning
than it would be to take steps to slow
global warming.
Although
global warming is likely to change the distribution of species, deforestation will result in the loss of more dry forests
than predicted by climate change
damage.
The townships must be relocated (at an estimated cost of more
than $ 100 million), so they should stand a good chance of a court upholding a claim that they suffered
damages because of
global warming.
The visuals are great, but I fear that it's just more hype for business purposes (PR) rather
than doing any serious
damage in the fight against
global warming.
The opportunities for preparation are one reason why economists expect the
damage from
global warming to be different, and perhaps less,
than from natural disasters that hit by surprise.
However, they are not willing to support a similar tax to keep them safe from a
global warming disaster, despite the fact that the
global damages would be far greater
than the
damage from the September 11th terrorist attacks.
We know what the costs were: the lives of more
than 30 000 people, most of them Iraqi civilians; cultural
damages; a great increase in mistrust of, and hatred for, the West; and many millions of tax dollars that would have been much better spent on education, health and combating
global warming.
Other aspects of
global warming's broad footprint on the world's ecosystems include changes in the abundance of more
than 80 percent of the thousands of species included in population studies; major poleward shifts in living ranges as
warm regions become hot, and cold regions become
warmer; major increases (in the south) and decreases (in the north) of the abundance of plankton, which forms the critical base of the ocean's food chain; the transformation of previously innocuous insect species like the Aspen leaf miner into pests that have
damaged millions of acres of forest; and an increase in the range and abundance of human pathogens like the cholera - causing bacteria Vibrio, the mosquito - borne dengue virus, and the ticks that carry Lyme disease - causing bacteria.
As Arctic and sub-Arctic regions
warm more
than the
global average, the increase in temperature could lead to more regular fire
damage to vegetation and soils and carbon release.
While forecasting the state of the environment more
than 80 years into the future is a notoriously inexact exercise, academics gathered by the the United Nations at the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change are concerned the world is headed for «extensive» species extinctions, serious crop
damage and irreversible increases in sea levels even before Trump started to unpick the fight against
global warming.
With an estimated social cost of carbon — a
damage estimate of
global warming pollution — of $ 65 (far less
than other estimates), the GED for coal - fired generators is 4.7 cents / kWh.
The monster storm — which killed more
than 100 people, destroyed entire communities, and inflicted more
than $ 70 billion in
damages — should have completely changed the way we approach climate impacts, resilience, and
global warming policy.
More
than 31,000 scientists across the US, «including more
than 9,000 PhD.s in fields such as atmospheric science, climatology, Earth science, environment and dozens of other specialties, have signed a petition rejecting «
global warming,» the assumption that the human production of greenhouse gases is
damaging Earth's climate.
Unfortunately, HFCs have huge
global warming potentials (GWPs) and are several thousands of times more
damaging to the climate
than CO2.
See: Laughable: UN Report: «
Damage being caused by climate change... is no longer a matter of debate» — «The science has become more irrevocable
than ever» — Sept. 24, 2009 — Also, AP's Seth Borenstein delivered his usual pabulum on
global warming, complete with extensive quotes from Corell.
Because the risks and
damages from
global warming go up significantly the higher that temperatures rise, even 2.5 °C
warming is still preferable to 3 °C, which is better
than 4 °C, which is way better
than 5 °C.
Not only have
global carbon emissions continued to rise 3 percent a year, but the science has made more clear that human populations and natural systems face serious risk of substantial climate
damage at
warming less
than 2 °C, they said.
«Climate science» as it is used by warmists implies adherence to a set of beliefs: (1) Increasing greenhouse gas concentrations will
warm the Earth's surface and atmosphere; (2) Human production of CO2 is producing significant increases in CO2 concentration; (3) The rate of rise of temperature in the 20th and 21st centuries is unprecedented compared to the rates of change of temperature in the previous two millennia and this can only be due to rising greenhouse gas concentrations; (4) The climate of the 19th century was ideal and may be taken as a standard to compare against any current climate; (5)
global climate models, while still not perfect, are good enough to indicate that continued use of fossil fuels at projected rates in the 21st century will cause the CO2 concentration to rise to a high level by 2100 (possibly 700 to 900 ppm); (6) The
global average temperature under this condition will rise more
than 3 °C from the late 19th century ideal; (7) The negative impact on humanity of such a rise will be enormous; (8) The only alternative to such a disaster is to immediately and sharply reduce CO2 emissions (reducing emissions in 2050 by 80 % compared to today's rate) and continue further reductions after 2050; (9) Even with such draconian CO2 reductions, the CO2 concentration is likely to reach at least 450 to 500 ppm by 2100 resulting in significant
damage to humanity; (10) Such reductions in CO2 emissions are technically feasible and economically affordable while providing adequate energy to a growing world population that is increasingly industrializing.
With
global warming making crop -
damaging weather ever more likely, building a larger buffer of grain stocks — closer to 110 days of consumption — is more urgent
than ever before.
As a matter of fact, adaptation to climate change, building resilience and dealing with loss and
damages will challenge the world just as much as the necessity of mitigating
global warming to no more
than two degrees Celsius or less.
(11/15/07) «Ban the Bulb: Worldwide Shift from Incandescents to Compact Fluorescents Could Close 270 Coal - Fired Power Plants» (5/9/07) «Massive Diversion of U.S. Grain to Fuel Cars is Raising World Food Prices» (3/21/07) «Distillery Demand for Grain to Fuel Cars Vastly Understated: World May Be Facing Highest Grain Prices in History» (1/4/07) «Santa Claus is Chinese OR Why China is Rising and the United States is Declining» (12/14/06) «Exploding U.S. Grain Demand for Automotive Fuel Threatens World Food Security and Political Stability» (11/3/06) «The Earth is Shrinking: Advancing Deserts and Rising Seas Squeezing Civilization» (11/15/06) «U.S. Population Reaches 300 Million, Heading for 400 Million: No Cause for Celebration» (10/4/06) «Supermarkets and Service Stations Now Competing for Grain» (7/13/06) «Let's Raise Gas Taxes and Lower Income Taxes» (5/12/06) «Wind Energy Demand Booming: Cost Dropping Below Conventional Sources Marks Key Milestone in U.S. Shift to Renewable Energy» (3/22/06) «Learning From China: Why the Western Economic Model Will not Work for the World» (3/9/05) «China Replacing the United States and World's Leading Consumer» (2/16/05)» Foreign Policy
Damaging U.S. Economy» (10/27/04) «A Short Path to Oil Independence» (10/13/04) «World Food Security Deteriorating: Food Crunch In 2005 Now Likely» (05/05/04) «World Food Prices Rising: Decades of Environmental Neglect Shrinking Harvests in Key Countries» (04/28/04) «Saudis Have U.S. Over a Barrel: Shifting Terms of Trade Between Grain and Oil» (4/14/04) «Europe Leading World Into Age of Wind Energy» (4/8/04) «China's Shrinking Grain Harvest: How Its Growing Grain Imports Will Affect World Food Prices» (3/10/04) «U.S. Leading World Away From Cigarettes» (2/18/04) «Troubling New Flows of Environmental Refugees» (1/28/04) «Wakeup Call on the Food Front» (12/16/03) «Coal: U.S. Promotes While Canada and Europe Move Beyond» (12/3/03) «World Facing Fourth Consecutive Grain Harvest Shortfall» (9/17/03) «Record Temperatures Shrinking World Grain Harvest» (8/27/03) «China Losing War with Advancing Deserts» (8/4/03) «Wind Power Set to Become World's Leading Energy Source» (6/25/03) «World Creating Food Bubble Economy Based on Unsustainable Use of Water» (3/13/03) «
Global Temperature Near Record for 2002: Takes Toll in Deadly Heat Waves, Withered Harvests, & Melting Ice» (12/11/02) «Rising Temperatures & Falling Water Tables Raising Food Prices» (8/21/02) «Water Deficits Growing in Many Countries» (8/6/02) «World Turning to Bicycle for Mobility and Exercise» (7/17/02) «New York: Garbage Capital of the World» (4/17/02) «Earth's Ice Melting Faster
Than Projected» (3/12/02) «World's Rangelands Deteriorating Under Mounting Pressure» (2/5/02) «World Wind Generating Capacity Jumps 31 Percent in 2001» (1/8/02) «This Year May be Second
Warmest on Record» (12/18/01) «World Grain Harvest Falling Short by 54 Million Tons: Water Shortages Contributing to Shortfall» (11/21/01) «Rising Sea Level Forcing Evacuation of Island Country» (11/15/01) «Worsening Water Shortages Threaten China's Food Security» (10/4/01) «Wind Power: The Missing Link in the Bush Energy Plan» (5/31/01) «Dust Bowl Threatening China's Future» (5/23/01) «Paving the Planet: Cars and Crops Competing for Land» (2/14/01) «Obesity Epidemic Threatens Health in Exercise - Deprived Societies» (12/19/00) «HIV Epidemic Restructuring Africa's Population» (10/31/00) «Fish Farming May Overtake Cattle Ranching As a Food Source» (10/3/00) «OPEC Has World Over a Barrel Again» (9/8/00) «Climate Change Has World Skating on Thin Ice» (8/29/00) «The Rise and Fall of the
Global Climate Coalition» (7/25/00) «HIV Epidemic Undermining sub-Saharan Africa» (7/18/00) «Population Growth and Hydrological Poverty» (6/21/00) «U.S. Farmers Double Cropping Corn And Wind Energy» (6/7/00) «World Kicking the Cigarette Habit» (5/10/00) «Falling Water Tables in China» (5/2/00) Top of page
A new study alleges that human - induced
global warming is a fundamental cause behind the 7.1 trillion gallons of torrential rainfall that a storm dumped on Louisiana in August, leading to a flooding disaster that killed at least 13 people and caused more
than $ 1 billion in
damage.
Some proposed «solutions» to
global warming could be more
damaging in the long run
than the stated dangers.
My compatriots Steve McIntyre and Ross McKitrick have inflicted more
damage on the reputation of Michael E Mann's
global -
warming hockey stick
than anybody else on the planet.
As recently as last December she said: «If we don't succeed in limiting
global warming to 2 degrees, then the costs of the resulting
damages will be many times higher
than what we now, with a change in our lifestyle, can achieve.»
For hurricanes, for example, it's useful to know that for the foreseeable future the incremental change in
damages caused by
global warming is relatively small compared to the impact of hurricanes in the first place, so that for most practical purposes it's better to be afraid of hurricanes
than to be afraid of
global warming's effect on hurricanes.
Though his model is, by his own admission, somewhat simplistic, Nordhaus says his conclusions reflect an estimated impact from
global warming that is «larger
than most existing estimates of market
damages.»
If we consider Sandy as a late season storm that anomalously strengthened in mid-latitude waters rather
than weakening or dissipating, an effect that seems to trap
damage from most late season tropical storms down in the Gulf, then the destruction north of Cape Hatteras from Sandy might be entirely owing to
global warming, not just 20 % as the Trenberth quote suggests.
The first line sounds more like a letter to Penthouse
than a scientific paper (you know, the classic «I never thought something like this would happen to me, but last Saturday night...) What caused me to delete the email (fortunately it was still in the trash so I could go back and find these quotes) was the line «findings in this paper could nt be more
damaging to manmade
global warming theory or the the thousands of climate scientists...» No academic in his right mind would state his / her conclusions in this manner, and even if they did, not editor or advisor would let it slip by.