Sentences with phrase «danger of unfair prejudice»

Indiana Trial Rule 403 goes on to state in part that even relevant evidence can be excluded if its probative value is outweighed by certain dangers of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues or misleading the jury.

In US v. Mitchell, No. 09 - 3041, the court of appeals affirmed defendant's conviction for money laundering conspiracy, holding that 1) the indictment was not so defective that defendant could not have reasonably understood the offense for which he was charged; and 2) defendant did not show that the danger of unfair prejudice substantially outweighed the probative value of certain tax information.

However, allowing a jury to hear evidence about a party's immigration status will most definitely carry with it the danger of unfair prejudice.

Is the probative value of the ESI substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice or one of the other factors identified by Rule 403, such that it should be excluded despite its relevance.

Does it make any sense to argue that the judge should exclude certain evidence from a bench trial because its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice?

1) The probative value of the sound spectrograms / voiceprints is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice; or

1) The probative value of the tape recording is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice; or

1) The probative value of the chart is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice; or

1) The probative value of the scientific evidence is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice; or

1) The probative value of the blackboard illustration is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice; or

1) The probative value of the television tape is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice.

[3] If the trial judge determines that the proffered testimony is relevant and reliable, he or she must then determine whether to exclude the evidence because its probative value is outweighed by the «danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury, or by considerations of undue delay, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence.»

Relevant evidence is inadmissible if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of issues, misleading the jury, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence.

1) The probative value of the chart or doll is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice; or

Under this rule, the danger of unfair prejudice has to substantially outweigh the evidence's probative value in order to exclude it, thereby tipping the scales in favor of admissibility.

1) The probative value of the model is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice; or

1) The probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice; or 2) The probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of confusion of the issues or misleading the jury; or 3) The probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger that it will cause undue delay, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence.

1) The probative value of the photograph is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice; or

1) The probative value of the motion picture is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice; or

1) The probative value of the videotape is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice; or

1) The probative value of the demonstration or experiment is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice; 2) The probative value of the demonstration or experiment is substantially outweighed by danger of confusion of the issues or misleading the jury or undue surprise; or 3) The probative value of the demonstration or experiment is substantially outweighed by danger that it will cause undue delay, waste of time, or needles presentation of cumulative evidence.

1) The probative value of the thermogram is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice; or

1) The probative value of the demonstration of the medical illustrations is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice; or

1) The medical model's probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice.

1) The probative value of the demonstration of the videotape deposition is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice; or

And that explains why Kim made what amounted to a 403 objection, arguing that the tape's probative value was substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice — the tape's relevance to show that the thing destroyed had evidentiary value is outweighed by the risk that the committee would use it to conclude that Jimmy committed the uncharged, but arguably more serious, act of altering legal documents.

1) The probative value of the article or object is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice; or

1) The probative value of the demonstration of the overhead presentation is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice; or

[Finding that the lower court abused its discretion by permitting the unabridged family court order to be introduced into evidence in its entirety where the probative value of the entire text of the order was substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice.