Sentences with phrase «dangerous dog laws because»

 § 67 - 4.1  Many of these dogs would likely be declared dangerous regardless under most dangerous dog laws because of their history.

Not exact matches

 That is an outdated myth, and when it is repeated as in a case like this, it contributes to tragedy not only for these dogs, but also sends a message to animal control, law enforcement, prosecutors, courts and the public that pit bulls are dangerous because of breeding and should be killed. Â

The local police chief stated to the news media that the ordinance was «unnecessary» because the town already had a breed neutral dangerous dog law in place.

«HB 97 is great for Utah because it finally means that dangerous dog laws can focus on behavior — both of the owner and the dog — rather than breed or appearance.

I learned recently that Virginia (where I am currently living) laws state «No canine or canine crossbreed shall be found to be a dangerous dog or vicious dog solely because it is a particular breed, nor shall the local governing body prohibit the ownership of a particular breed of canine or canine crossbreed.»

Owners of small dogs who live in neighborhoods that do not routinely enforce leash laws often end up with pets who don't get enough exercise or socialization, because it is too dangerous for them to walk in their own neighborhoods!

Publicly funded animal control agencies also operate under a range of policies, but because they are charged by law with protecting the community from dogs that are nuisances or dangerous and because they do no fund - raising around humane issues, they are often denigrated as animal killers.

(See Losing in Aurora, pit bull advocates set their dogs on us, Blue Buffalo, & Home 4 the Holidays, Christmas baby killed by pit bulls because Miami - Dade law is not enforced, and Quebec introduces toughest dangerous dog law in North America.)

Through its national pit bull initiatives, Best Friends Animal Society encourages state and municipal governments to adopt breed - neutral «dangerous dog» laws that focus on the key causes of dog aggression — owners» failure to spay or neuter, train and socialize dogs regardless of breed, or because they abuse or neglect dogs or force them to live on chains.

Simply because a law designates that these dogs need to be registered does not mean that they will be and it is the most aggressive dogs that are often unregistered and so the «Dangerous Dogs Act» appears to have faidogs need to be registered does not mean that they will be and it is the most aggressive dogs that are often unregistered and so the «Dangerous Dogs Act» appears to have faidogs that are often unregistered and so the «Dangerous Dogs Act» appears to have faiDogs Act» appears to have failed.

In this decision, Justice D.A. Hogarth strikes down sections of a Langley BC by - law regarding dangerous dogs because the City invoked them under their emergency powers when there was no evidence of an emergency.