Instead,
dangerous dog laws from now on must focus on what's said to be the more effective approach: regulating behavior, of the dogs themselves and of their owners.
Not exact matches
The ex-Whitehall chiefs cite examples of bad
laws that have resulted
from the way government now operates, including the poll tax of 1990, the
Dangerous Dogs Act of 1991, the failure of the Child Support Agency, the Hunting Act 2004 and the story of the Millennium Dome.
DELTONA - Two
dangerous pit bulls that were stolen twice
from a Daytona Beach animal shelter while they awaited euthanasia were recovered and destroyed Monday night.Armed with a search warrant, Deltona Animal Control workers and officers
from several local
law enforcement agencies seized the
dogs at 7 p.m. Monday, Deltona Fire Chief Robert Rogers said Tuesday.The
dogs - a dark brindle male named Chewie and a white - chested female named Sadie - were found at a Deltona residence and taken to the Halifax Humane Society shelter in Daytona Beach.
A
law that took effect Thursday requires
dangerous dogs to be sterilized - a move aimed at eliminating pit bulls
from France within 10 years.
We also support reasonable
laws to protect the public
from dangerous dogs and oppose breed - specific legislation in any form.
The
law should protect your community
from all
dangerous dogs.
Breed neutral «
dangerous dog»
laws, «leash
laws» that prohibit
dogs from running loose off their owners» property, and «anti chaining»
laws can control the behavior of individual
dogs and individual owners and thereby help reduce the risk of harm to people and other animals.
NAIA supports reasonable
laws to protect the public
from dangerous dogs and opposes breed - specific legislation in any form.
Publicly funded animal control agencies also operate under a range of policies, but because they are charged by
law with protecting the community
from dogs that are nuisances or
dangerous and because they do no fund - raising around humane issues, they are often denigrated as animal killers.
Establish better communication between area
law enforcement and animal care and control agencies, including sharing of information about addresses with histories of calls for violent offenses or
dangerous animals and establishing procedures for enlisting assistance
from these agencies in planning responses to situations where
dogs are known or likely to be present
Washington County Animal Services, located at the Bonnie L. Hays Small Animal Shelter, cares for lost animals, finds homes for abandoned pets, licenses
dogs, enforces animal cruelty
laws and protects our citizens
from dangerous animals.
The Government wants to hear what people think about the
law as it stands and what more we might do to protect people
from dangerous dogs, while supporting the vast majority of responsible
dog owners,» said Hilary Benn at the a launch of the consultation.
Some restrictions that various versions of BSL impose are: - muzzling and leashing in public - muzzling and leashing in cars - extra-short leash lengths - automatic
dangerous or vicious
dog designation, without any bite history - banning
from city parks and beaches where other breeds are allowed - banning
from leash - free parks where other breeds are allowed - banning completely
from jurisdiction (although sometimes existing
dogs are allowed to stay)- special (i.e., more expensive) licensing and jurisdiction - wide registry - special tags identifying the
dog as a restricted
dog - mandatory microchipping and photograph - mandatory insurance (often one million dollars) for each individual
dog on the premises - mandatory signage indicating the presence of the
dog on the owner's property - mandatory secure enclosures (in some cases, mandatory chaining)- mandatory spay / neuter (to eventually eliminate the breed entirely)- higher fines and / or jail time if a restricted breed bites or menaces - fines and / or jail time for any infraction of any provision regarding restricted breeds - age limit for walking the
dog in public - persons with criminal records not allowed to own a restricted breed - ability of
law enforcement to stop owners on the street just to check the
dog's status - ability of
law enforcement to seize
dogs without proof of wrongdoing - ability of
law enforcement to enter an owner's home, with or without a warrant, to investigate and / or seize a
dog
By deeming a
dog «
dangerous»,
law - abiding and responsible
dog owners will shy away
from owning these breeds, therefore ensuring that the only hands that these
dogs are in are the wrong ones.
Angel's
Law was established to protect the public, especially young children and others unable to protect themselves
from vicious attacks,
from the threat to health and safety that
dangerous dogs present.
The solution is to create preventative
laws that greatly reduce the risk of
dangerous dog breeds, primarily pit bulls,
from ever inflicting a first attack.
Another type of breed - specific
law is to automatically declare a breed prima facia «potentially
dangerous» or «
dangerous,» which triggers various regulations for the
dog's owner to prevent a first attack
from occurring.
But some pets can prove
dangerous and Lake County leaders aim to put teeth in a
law that regulates domestic animals.Pets and pet - related issues -
from barking
dogs to pooper - scoopers to vicious animals - soon will come under the scrutiny of a group that will advise Lake County on proposed revisions to its animal control
law.County commissioners recently approved forming an advisory committee to study changes to Lake's animal control ordinance.
In a recent interview with the Salt Lake City Weekly, Best Friends Animal Society senior legislative attorney Ledy VanKavage explained, «The trend is to go away
from breed - discriminatory
laws and pass comprehensive reckless - owner and
dangerous -
dog laws that are breed - neutral.»
Such a
law would give the owner incentive and help by removing the
dog from a potentially
dangerous dog designation if after training and responsible management, the behavior improved. Â
A pit bull who was seized
from a notorious dogfighting operation in Virginia, rehabilitated in Utah, and adopted by a couple in Texas helped make the case for a new
law in Nevada that prohibits local governments
from enacting and enforcing regulations that deem a
dog dangerous based solely on its breed.
Delegate Cheryl Glenn will introduce an amendment to the state's proposed
dangerous dog law this week that would prohibit municipalities
from banning or regulating
dogs based on their breed.
It also would have strengthened the rest of the
dangerous dog laws, to better protect the community
from negligent owners who fail to exercise proper care and control over their
dogs.
Animal Control resources are not infinite, and thus, as animal control resources are used on an unenforceable
law that target
dogs that look a certain way, they take resources away
from dealing with stray
dogs, irresponsible pet owners or
dogs that really are
dangerous based on their actual behavior.
The
dangerous dogs act was a
law passed in the United Kingdom in 1991 aimed to try to reduce the number of
dog attacks by specific breeds.Parliament stepped in to create this Act after a slew of incidences where serious injury or death resulted
from dog attacks of a particularly aggressive breed that were uncontrolled.
«We draft and lobby for
laws that protect communities
from reckless owners and
dangerous dogs.
As non-profit organizations, shelters are exempt
from many of the
laws that regulate pet businesses, a
dangerous loophole that allows them to import and sell large numbers of stray
dogs and cats
from places as distant as Puerto Rico, Mexico, and Taiwan without appropriate oversight.
Generally, these
laws are supported by people who are afraid of
dogs, victims of
dog attacks, and people who have been led to believe that their families are at risk
from dangerous dogs in their neighborhoods.