Sentences with phrase «dangerous dog laws in»

The plus one this week is really a plus 4 — as I think it represents a huge turning point for where we're headed with dangerous dog laws in this country.

The local police chief stated to the news media that the ordinance was «unnecessary» because the town already had a breed neutral dangerous dog law in place.

(See Losing in Aurora, pit bull advocates set their dogs on us, Blue Buffalo, & Home 4 the Holidays, Christmas baby killed by pit bulls because Miami - Dade law is not enforced, and Quebec introduces toughest dangerous dog law in North America.)

By contrast, following Winnipeg's enactment of a breed - neutral dangerous dog law in 2000, pit bull bites remained low and both Rottweiler and total dog bites decreased significantly (Winnipeg reported bite statistics, 1984 - 2003).

Not exact matches

The Dangerous Dogs Act Study Group (DDASG) and Lord Redesdale criticised the Government for what they saw as its part in the ongoing problem of «status dogs» by making them appeal to those wishing to intimidate others and rebel against the existing Dogs Act Study Group (DDASG) and Lord Redesdale criticised the Government for what they saw as its part in the ongoing problem of «status dogs» by making them appeal to those wishing to intimidate others and rebel against the existing dogs» by making them appeal to those wishing to intimidate others and rebel against the existing law.

Richin said the law should require owners of dangerous dogs to be trained to properly care for them, and dogs should be kept in yards with security fencing.

Katy Clark (Lab, rabbit in the headlights) wants a tightening in the law on dangerous dogs.

Following news that the Environment Food and Rural Affairs (EFRA) Committee has recommended that Defra extends the law on dangerous dogs to cover dog attacks that injure a protected animal, which would include cats, Cats Protection has issued the following statement: «We very much welcome this recommendation and are pleased that the issue was raised in yesterday's House of Commons debate,» explained Jacqui Cuff, Cats...

His succinct insight into dangerous dog laws and breed specific legislation in America is worth quoting.

The Montréal SPCA argued that the law was discriminatory towards dogs that are not dangerous, which could result in innocent, well - behaved shelter dogs being euthanized.

Muzzles must be used by law in the case of dog breeds that are considered «potentially dangerous».

DELTONA - Two dangerous pit bulls that were stolen twice from a Daytona Beach animal shelter while they awaited euthanasia were recovered and destroyed Monday night.Armed with a search warrant, Deltona Animal Control workers and officers from several local law enforcement agencies seized the dogs at 7 p.m. Monday, Deltona Fire Chief Robert Rogers said Tuesday.The dogs - a dark brindle male named Chewie and a white - chested female named Sadie - were found at a Deltona residence and taken to the Halifax Humane Society shelter in Daytona Beach.

Mayor Rudolph Giuliani is calling for tougher laws regulating dangerous dogs after three separate attacks by pit bulls and Rottweilers in two days.

Local ordinances in most Florida counties allow animal control officers to seize dangerous dogs, but the laws carry only minimal punishments, said Don Westfall, manager of the Orange County Animal Control Department.

In addition to educational programs within the community, Love - A-Bull also believes that dangerous dog laws should be focused on the actions or inaction of the owner, rather than on the breed of the dog.

 That is an outdated myth, and when it is repeated as in a case like this, it contributes to tragedy not only for these dogs, but also sends a message to animal control, law enforcement, prosecutors, courts and the public that pit bulls are dangerous because of breeding and should be killed. Â

Allowing a «sworn statement» by a citizen to initiate a «dangerous dog» investigation, as provided by «Emily's Law,» is a good idea... last year our legislators amended our «dangerous Dog» laws in Virgindog» investigation, as provided by «Emily's Law,» is a good idea... last year our legislators amended our «dangerous Dog» laws in VirginDog» laws in Virginia.

The Livingston County Kentucky Fiscal Court is in the process of trying to enact a dangerous dog law that would target several different dog breeds.

This bill in its original form would allow a sheriff, local law enforcement officer or animal control officer to determine whether a dog is dangerous and requires the court to take that determination into account when making its decision.

It's great to see that logic and rational thinking are winning out over hysteria in creating dangerous dog laws.

The Ohio Revised Code has laws regarding dogs running loose, dog licenses and nuisance, dangerous and vicious dogs outlined in Chapter 955.

We also support reasonable laws to protect the public from dangerous dogs and oppose breed - specific legislation in any form.

Essentially, this ruling now makes breed specific legislation in Ohio for anything beyond «purebred» American Pit Bull Terriers and American Staffordshire Terriers very problematic — meaning that they would have to go through all due processes and puts more pressure on cities with laws pertaining to mixed breeds and other breeds, like cane corsos, that declaring these types of dogs dangerous without due process is «unreasonable and arbitrary.»

The city passed it's dangerous dog law — which includes a ban on «pit bulls» — in March of 2008, and it has been a huge black - eye and distraction for the city.

Since she was the only vet in the community, this strategy worked like a charm and the city council passed a comprehensive breed - neutral dangerous - dog law instead.

With proven experience and expertise in delivering effective public awareness campaigns, and in working in collaboration with local and central governments to pass and implement laws and regulations to end cruel practices and strengthen animal protection legal provisions, we are well positioned to tackle Indonesia's cruel and dangerous dog meat trade.

In March 2009, Italy repealed its long - standing breed specific law in which 17 dogs were identified as «dangerous breeds.&raquIn March 2009, Italy repealed its long - standing breed specific law in which 17 dogs were identified as «dangerous breeds.&raquin which 17 dogs were identified as «dangerous breeds.»

Behavior - based laws are more fair and more efficient at addressing the issue of dangerous dogs in communities.

The answer to dangerous dogs can be found in generic Dangerous Dog Laws which address the underlying cause of most dog - related deaths and injuries — irresponsible dog odangerous dogs can be found in generic Dangerous Dog Laws which address the underlying cause of most dog - related deaths and injuries — irresponsible dog oDangerous Dog Laws which address the underlying cause of most dog - related deaths and injuries — irresponsible dog ownershDog Laws which address the underlying cause of most dog - related deaths and injuries — irresponsible dog ownershdog - related deaths and injuries — irresponsible dog ownershdog ownership.

Unleashed dogs are against the law in Chicago except in designated dog parks, which can themselves be dirty and dangerous and filled with huge, poorly trained dogs.

Owners of small dogs who live in neighborhoods that do not routinely enforce leash laws often end up with pets who don't get enough exercise or socialization, because it is too dangerous for them to walk in their own neighborhoods!

If you don't sell the dog to rehome it at a large fee it will end up in dangerous situation like labs experiment on them, lie there are laws against that now and frankly its a scare tactic.

Under Virginia's new law, dogs must wear a special «dangerous dog» tag, and when he goes out in public, he must also wear an orange «danger» collar.

NAIA supports reasonable laws to protect the public from dangerous dogs and opposes breed - specific legislation in any form.

The day before the holiday, Cincinnati City Council unanimously overturned the Queen City's 13 - year - old ban on American Staffordshire Terriers and Staffordshire Bull Terriers and replaced the breed - specific law with a generic dangerous dog ordinance written in part by Ohio Valley Dog Owners Inc., an NAIA affiliadog ordinance written in part by Ohio Valley Dog Owners Inc., an NAIA affiliaDog Owners Inc., an NAIA affiliate.

More significantly, after pit bull advocates won legislation in 19 states prohibiting the passage of breed - specific local dangerous dog ordinances, victim advocates have mobilized on campaign budgets of nothing to stop the passage of similar laws in at least six other states, as well as defeating aggressive efforts to repeal pit bull bans by ballot initiative in Miami in 2012 and Aurora, Colorado in 2014, winning the 2016 passage of a pit bull ban in Montreal, Quebec, Canada, and obtaining the introduction of a proposed pit bull ban throughout Quebec province.

The bill also updates Massachusetts» antiquated animal control laws, creates oversight of and requires training for animal control officers in the state, and strengthens dangerous dog laws without targeting specific breeds.

In summary, the ASPCA advocates the implementation of a community dog bite prevention program encompassing media and educational outreach in conjunction with the enactment, and vigorous enforcement, of breed - neutral laws that focus on the irresponsible and dangerous behavior of individual guardians and their dogIn summary, the ASPCA advocates the implementation of a community dog bite prevention program encompassing media and educational outreach in conjunction with the enactment, and vigorous enforcement, of breed - neutral laws that focus on the irresponsible and dangerous behavior of individual guardians and their dogin conjunction with the enactment, and vigorous enforcement, of breed - neutral laws that focus on the irresponsible and dangerous behavior of individual guardians and their dogs.

The ASPCA believes that this approach — promoting education in the appropriate care, training and supervision of dogs as well as state and local laws that address licensing, reproductive status, chaining / improper confinement, cruel treatment and at - large dogs; imposing civil and criminal liability on guardians for their negligent and reckless behavior; and targeting problematic dogs and guardians early with progressively escalating penalties — constitutes the most compassionate, fair, efficient and ultimately effective means of resolving concerns related to dangerous dogs in the community.

In Oregon we helped pass a landmark dangerous dog law and in Monroe County, Florida, we worked with residents and local government to replace an unenforceable $ 500 intact animal fee with a $ 35 fee, removed arbitrary restrictions on animal limits, and made other changes that vastly increase chances for compliance and cultivate goodwill and cooperation between citizens, lawmakers and animal control officialIn Oregon we helped pass a landmark dangerous dog law and in Monroe County, Florida, we worked with residents and local government to replace an unenforceable $ 500 intact animal fee with a $ 35 fee, removed arbitrary restrictions on animal limits, and made other changes that vastly increase chances for compliance and cultivate goodwill and cooperation between citizens, lawmakers and animal control officialin Monroe County, Florida, we worked with residents and local government to replace an unenforceable $ 500 intact animal fee with a $ 35 fee, removed arbitrary restrictions on animal limits, and made other changes that vastly increase chances for compliance and cultivate goodwill and cooperation between citizens, lawmakers and animal control officials.

Establish better communication between area law enforcement and animal care and control agencies, including sharing of information about addresses with histories of calls for violent offenses or dangerous animals and establishing procedures for enlisting assistance from these agencies in planning responses to situations where dogs are known or likely to be present

Belarus adapted the Treatment of Animals Law in 2012 that states a list of requirements for potentially dangerous breeds of dogs.

Her continuing efforts to draft and help pass legislation protecting children and animals resulted in local and state laws She has trained over 3,000 professionals and continues training law enforcement, prosecutors, judges, veterinarians, animal shelter staff and more throughout Georgia on animal law, animal cruelty, dog fighting, dangerous dog laws and dog bite cases.

Some restrictions that various versions of BSL impose are: - muzzling and leashing in public - muzzling and leashing in cars - extra-short leash lengths - automatic dangerous or vicious dog designation, without any bite history - banning from city parks and beaches where other breeds are allowed - banning from leash - free parks where other breeds are allowed - banning completely from jurisdiction (although sometimes existing dogs are allowed to stay)- special (i.e., more expensive) licensing and jurisdiction - wide registry - special tags identifying the dog as a restricted dog - mandatory microchipping and photograph - mandatory insurance (often one million dollars) for each individual dog on the premises - mandatory signage indicating the presence of the dog on the owner's property - mandatory secure enclosures (in some cases, mandatory chaining)- mandatory spay / neuter (to eventually eliminate the breed entirely)- higher fines and / or jail time if a restricted breed bites or menaces - fines and / or jail time for any infraction of any provision regarding restricted breeds - age limit for walking the dog in public - persons with criminal records not allowed to own a restricted breed - ability of law enforcement to stop owners on the street just to check the dog's status - ability of law enforcement to seize dogs without proof of wrongdoing - ability of law enforcement to enter an owner's home, with or without a warrant, to investigate and / or seize a dog

By deeming a dog «dangerous», law - abiding and responsible dog owners will shy away from owning these breeds, therefore ensuring that the only hands that these dogs are in are the wrong ones.

The law requires dog owners to be over the age of 18 to walk the dog, have certification of training the dog, obtain breeding records, always use a leash and muzzle in walks and must be in a fenced yard with clear warning of dangerous dog, or on a leash at all times.

Enforced the Responsible Treatment of animals Federal Law in 2011, recognizing several «dangerous» dog breeds.

In both of those cases, the cities of Reynoldsburg and Lima were found to have dangerous dog laws that conflicted with Ohio state law, and were therefore unenforceable.

But some pets can prove dangerous and Lake County leaders aim to put teeth in a law that regulates domestic animals.Pets and pet - related issues - from barking dogs to pooper - scoopers to vicious animals - soon will come under the scrutiny of a group that will advise Lake County on proposed revisions to its animal control law.County commissioners recently approved forming an advisory committee to study changes to Lake's animal control ordinance.

In a recent interview with the Salt Lake City Weekly, Best Friends Animal Society senior legislative attorney Ledy VanKavage explained, «The trend is to go away from breed - discriminatory laws and pass comprehensive reckless - owner and dangerous - dog laws that are breed - neutral.»