Sentences with phrase «dangerous global warming at»

«Campaigners call for an end to fossil fuel finance and subsidies to avoid dangerous global warming at a meeting to mark two years since the signing of the landmark agreement.»

The argument is whether us humans have super-imposed our excessive carbon dioxide emissions upon the existing natural balance of the climate system — thereby altering it's natural chemistry leading to possible dangerous global warming at some point in the near and distant future.

Not exact matches

The latter has already begun producing methane and CO2 in the Arctic, starting a feedback process which may lead to uncontrollable, very dangerous global warming, akin to that which occurred at the PETM.

Much of what they said meshed with the overall theme of the meeting, which organizers said was aimed at proving that the recent consensus on dangerous human - caused global warming was shaped more by politics and passion than data.

If environmental groups and their backers want to see concrete progress on limiting the risk that humans will propel dangerous global warming, they may need more than just additional money and better organization, but also a hard look at core strategies and a philosophy that has long cast climate change as primarily a conventional pollution problem, not a technology problem.

To prime the conversation, here's a lecture Oppenheimer delivered at Pace Law School last November, titled «When Will Global Warming Become Dangerous?»

But the episode — revealed at a recent meeting of the Seismological Society of America in Salt Lake City, Utah — is a reminder that the energies released by the dangerous mix of swirling winds and warm oceans are dramatic and, with global warming, could become even more frequent and more devastating.

The president - elect of the Maldives, a nation of 1,200 low islands in the Indian Ocean, is planning to establish an investment fund with some of its earnings from tourism so it can buy a haven for its citizens should global warming raise sea levels at a dangerous pace, according to several news reports.

People look at the same graph and some see dangerous global warming, while others see climate change as always has taken place.

Karlsson also refers to «natural variability during the Cambrian», but fails to inform his readers that at that time atmospheric carbon dioxide levels exceeded the pre-industrial level of 280 ppm by 15 - times (yes, fifteen times) without any known parallel dangerous global warming.

The latter has already begun producing methane and CO2 in the Arctic, starting a feedback process which may lead to uncontrollable, very dangerous global warming, akin to that which occurred at the PETM.

Dr. S. Fred Singer, one of the world's earliest and most credible critics of the theory that global warming is man - made and dangerous, will be recognized with an award for Lifetime Achievement in Climate Science at an international conference on global warming taking place July 7 — 9 in Las Vegas, Nevada.

Luntz figured out years ago what the Newt Gingrich of the 1990s didn't understand at all — it could be politically dangerous to be seen as opposing all action on global warming.

That's a dangerous combination, since urban populations are more at risk of disruption from the effects of global warming.

It has to be such that anyone predicting dangerous man - made global warming is automatically laughed at with rolling eyes.

It is astounding that dangerous man - made global warming fanatics like Obama and Prince Charles, in addition to all those climate change charlatans at various academies of science such as The Royal Society, prefer to ignore real word observational data on climate and solar activity, in favour of psuedo - science and climate models that consistently have failed in their scenarios and projections.

Such higher levels of warming would make it much more difficult for countries to keep the global temperature rise to below 2C, as they agreed to do at the landmark Paris climate summit last year, to avoid dangerous extreme weather and negative effects on food security.

And since the predicted range of warming for the Arctic by the century's end is 5.6 °C at a conservative estimate and 12.4 °C at the most, the permafrost may be seen as yet another dangerous factor in the global warming equation.

Further, the probabilistic approach reveals a picture startling to even most global - warming pessimists: If we're to avoid precipitating what that U.N. Framework Convention genteelly calls «dangerous anthropogenic interference,» we're going to have to aim at an atmospheric greenhouse - gas concentration target that, by current trends, we'll reach in less than two decades.

At the G - 7 summit over the weekend, President Trump refused on Saturday to recommit to the Paris agreement, while the six other leading industrialized nations reiterated their support for the accord, which sets out a global action plan to avoid dangerous climate change by limiting global warming to well below 2 degrees Celsius.

Where the believers in dangerous global warming are so ignorant of the very basics of life and of science at any level they can not even give the atmospheric component they want banned its correct name but use the name of the element which is the basis of ALL life on this planet that of «Carbon» as the item that is to be eliminated from the planet..

Is his research is so dangerous to the cash cow that is «global warming» that it had to be stopped at any cost?

Per the IPCC's global warming hypothesis, at the very top of the troposphere, above the equator region, is the location (12 km, 200hPa @ 20 ° N - 20 ° S) that triggers a positive climate feedback, which produces the mythical runaway, tipping point of accelerated, dangerous global warming, which of course is unequivocal and irrefutable, except when it isn't.

I was amazed at the Government and Green responses to the serious flooding in the English Midlands a couple of years ago, when increassed rainfall due to alleged Man - made Global Warming was trumpeted as a cause for the flooding; anyone who pointed out that generations of covering flood plains with buildings, concrete and ashphalt was quite a dangerous thing to do was derided as a simpleton or an ignoramus.

A (2) Modern warming, glacier and sea ice recession, sea level rise, drought and hurricane intensities... are all occurring at unprecedentedly high and rapid rates, and the effects are globally synchronous (not just regional)... and thus dangerous consequences to the global biosphere and human civilizations loom in the near future as a consequence of anthropogenic influences.

Every country would voluntarily pledge to restrain its greenhouse gas emissions and meet regularly at the United Nations to ratchet up ambitions over time — all in the hopes of keeping global warming below the «dangerous» level of 2 °C.

But most importantly of all, and over the time scale that counts for testing the hypothesis of dangerous global warming, since 1998 the Earth has failed to warm at all despite an increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide of more than 5 per cent.

One of the rallying points was a scientific calculation that the rise of global temperature could not be held below 2 °C (the internationally accepted point at which the warming would become «dangerous») unless at least half the known reserves of fossil fuels were left in the ground.

It you want to see the essence of the genuinely dangerous union of church and state that our Founding Fathers sought to protect us against, just look at the Global Warming movement.

The 2007 IPCC report found that the cost of actions to stabilize concentrations of heat - trapping emissions at a level that gives us a good chance of avoiding dangerous warming would amount to less than a 0.12 percent reduction in average annual global gross domestic product (GDP) growth rate in 2050.

By Robby Soave — Fifth grade students at Fremont Elementary School in Colorado were assigned a reading passage that describes global warming as a dangerous, man - made phenomenon that will destroy civilization in a few hundred years.

In fact, if we continue on our current path of high heat - trapping emissions, the region is projected to see forest fires during June and July at two to three times its current rate.2, 6 Some 1 billion metric tons of organic matter and older - growth trees could burn7, 15 — accelerating the release of stored carbon and creating a dangerous global warming amplification or feedback loop.5, 14

They clutch at any life preserver to ward off the rising tide of evidence for dangerous man - made global warming, as demonstrated by the zeal that led to 9 anti-science blogs appearing in the finalists of various categories.

The primary problem is that the entire global warming movement is being sold based on telling people that the global average temperature of the Earth is increasing at a dangerous rate.

Article: The feared dangerous modern global warming that our «elites» constantly obsess about can be so amazingly evasive, and at the same time, so rhetorically threatening.

At a recent protest rally, a scientist explained why he thinks the dangerous global warming hypothesis has been proved wrong.

Among other things, the authors state that [1] «scientists do not know how large the greenhouse effect is, whether it will lead to a harmful amount of global warming, or (if it will) what should be done about it» (p. 560); [2] that «profound disagreements» about global warming exist within the scientific community (p. 560); [3] that so - called «activist scientists» say that the earth's climate is warming (p. 560); [4] that «science doesn't know whether we are experiencing a dangerous level of global warming or how bad the greenhouse effect Is, if it exists at all» (p. 569); [5] and that global warming is «enmeshed in scientific uncertainty» (p. 573).

Real world observations tell us that the IPCC's speculative computer models do not work, ice is not melting at an enhanced rate, sea - level rise is not accelerating, the frequency and intensity of extreme weather events is not increasing, and dangerous global warming is not occurring.»

So to say that human - caused global warming is proven to be a dangerous problem is untrue, and to introduce policies aimed at stopping presumed warming when cooling is actually under way is vainglorious.

Perhaps it is time to take a hard look at another industrial chemical with dangerous global warming impacts — ammonia.

2009 Many experts warn that global warming is arriving at a faster and more dangerous pace than anticipated just a few years earlier.

[11] Recent estimates also suggest that at current emission rates the Earth could pass a threshold of 2 °C global warming, which the United Nations» IPCC designated as the upper limit to avoid «dangerous» global warming, by 2036.

Why does Professor Reif continue to champion the notion of dangerous manmade global warming when it is so greatly at odds with observation?

After becoming fed up with the childish and dangerous tactics of alarmists, particularly the use of the term «climate denier,» Spencer said that the «global - warming Nazis» were in fact threatening millions of lives — especially among the poor — with their «pseudo-scientific ramblings» and support for fascist - style «radical policies» supposedly aimed at combating «global warming.»

Perhaps humanity would take that tack if we were trying to limit global warming — say, we had already passed the Paris Agreement's aspirational 1.5 degree warming threshold and were trying not to broach the more dangerous 2 degree mark — while at the same time working toward rapid decarbonization.

The idea that carbon dioxide emissions will trigger dangerous global warming is at the very heart of the climate crisis.

Nearly all experts now agreed that there was at least a serious possibility of dangerous global warming.