Early estimates for
dangerous global warming based on the «burning embers» approach [1], [19]--[20] have been recognized as probably being too conservative [77].
Early estimates for
dangerous global warming based on the «burning embers» approach [1], [19]--[20] have been recognized as probably being too conservative [77].
Not exact matches
When the degree and
basis of «
global warming» is so unclear, it is of course impossible to define a «
dangerous» level of
warming.
«
Based on climate model studies and the history of the Earth the authors conclude that additional
global warming of about 1 °C (1.8 °F) or more, above
global temperature in 2000, is likely to be
dangerous.»
10: Given that the authors of the largest ever survey of peer - reviewed opinion in learned papers marked only 64 of 11,944 papers, or 0.5 %, as stating they agreed with the official «consensus» proposition that recent
warming was mostly manmade, on what rational, evidence -
based, scientific ground is it daily asserted that «97 % of scientists» believe recent
global warming is not only manmade but
dangerous?
Where the believers in
dangerous global warming are so ignorant of the very basics of life and of science at any level they can not even give the atmospheric component they want banned its correct name but use the name of the element which is the
basis of ALL life on this planet that of «Carbon» as the item that is to be eliminated from the planet..
Wasdell said that the draft submitted by scientists contained a metric projecting cumulative total anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions, on the
basis of which a «carbon budget» was estimated — the quantity of carbon that could be safely emitted without breaching the 2 degrees Celsius limit to avoid
dangerous global warming.
Brandon Gates's commentary as in point 1) is
based the premise that
dangerous human - caused
global warming requiring immediate radical mitigating action is occurring and has been since ~ 1800 and any observations that do not accord with or contradict that a priori assumption are airily dismissed by «that is the way CO2 induced
warming occurs».
Brandon Gates's commentary as in point 1) is
based the premise that
dangerous human - caused
global warming requiring immediate radical mitigating action is occurring...
Based on climate model studies and the history of the Earth, the Hansen and Sato conclude that additional
global warming of about 1ºC (1.8 ºF) or more, above
global temperature in 2000, is likely to be
dangerous.
The primary problem is that the entire
global warming movement is being sold
based on telling people that the
global average temperature of the Earth is increasing at a
dangerous rate.
It is poor public policy that condones restrictions on grazing operations, or taxes on grazing animals,
based on disputed theories that claim that bodily emissions from farm animals will cause
dangerous global warming.
The EASAC study challenges findings by Swiss -
based researchers, who said last year that time had already run out to prevent
dangerous global warming, and argued for geo - engineering solutions to halt climate change.
PARIS (December 8, 2015)-- The Science
Based Targets initiative announced today that 114 companies have now committed to set emissions reduction targets in line with what scientists say is necessary to keep
global warming below the
dangerous threshold of 2 degrees Celsius.