Sentences with phrase «dangerous global warming hypothesis»

They appoint the members, control the data and fund most of the research, mostly to prove the human - caused dangerous global warming hypothesis.

At a recent protest rally, a scientist explained why he thinks the dangerous global warming hypothesis has been proved wrong.

Recognition of the essential flaw in the dangerous global warming hypothesis predates the IPCC and has been there for the world to see in the title of a paper published in 1966 by CSIRO division of meteorological physics former chief Bill Priestley: «The limitation of temperature in hot climates by evaporation.»

Roy Spencer is a bona fide climate scientist who disagrees with the dangerous global warming hypothesis.

Not exact matches

CAGW or Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming is the acronym used (mostly by those that don't support taking immediate action on climate change) for the theory (or collection of hypotheses) that attribute most of the observed modern warming to human activities and warn that continuing similar activities (mostly emitting CO2) could result in warming that is dangerous to both civilization and a number of ecosWarming is the acronym used (mostly by those that don't support taking immediate action on climate change) for the theory (or collection of hypotheses) that attribute most of the observed modern warming to human activities and warn that continuing similar activities (mostly emitting CO2) could result in warming that is dangerous to both civilization and a number of ecoswarming to human activities and warn that continuing similar activities (mostly emitting CO2) could result in warming that is dangerous to both civilization and a number of ecoswarming that is dangerous to both civilization and a number of ecosystems.

The hypothesis implicit though rarely explicitly stated in the IPCC's work is that dangerous global warming is resulting, or will result, from human - related greenhouse gas emissions.

significant new peer - reviewed research has cast even more doubt on the hypothesis of dangerous human - caused global warming. . .

Or do you mean people who disagree with the hypothesis that man made CO2 emissions will cause dangerous global warming?

Per the IPCC's global warming hypothesis, at the very top of the troposphere, above the equator region, is the location (12 km, 200hPa @ 20 ° N - 20 ° S) that triggers a positive climate feedback, which produces the mythical runaway, tipping point of accelerated, dangerous global warming, which of course is unequivocal and irrefutable, except when it isn't.

In an article on «the perils of confirmation bias,» published for the Global Warming Policy Foundation (a group firmly opposed to policies that counteract climate change), Ridley suggested that «governments should fund groups that intend to explore alternative hypotheses about the likely future of climate as well as those that explore the dangerous man - made climate change prediction.»

The letter casts doubt on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) «hypothesis of dangerous human - caused global warming», and argues that current climate change is within natural variations.

«Unlike a decade ago, when few scientists dared express doubt that humanity's CO2 emissions are causing dangerous global warming, it seems now that not a week goes by without some leading expert condemning the hypothesis.

It is my contention (and that of many others) that in fact this is the default null hypothesis and until proponents of the anthropogenic global warming hyothesis come up with some better evidence to back up their claims of imminent dangerous warming driven by co2 and a water vapour feedback to its increasing levels, the null hypothesis is the best one we have.

But most importantly of all, and over the time scale that counts for testing the hypothesis of dangerous global warming, since 1998 the Earth has failed to warm at all despite an increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide of more than 5 per cent.

In stark contrast to the often repeated assertion that the science of climate change is «settled,» significant new peer - reviewed research has cast even more doubt on the hypothesis of dangerous human - caused global warming.

But Evans» essential point is that while the dangerous - global - warming - hypothesis has been proved wrong, powerful vested interests seem incapable of admitting it.

The letter cast doubt on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) «hypothesis of dangerous human - caused global warming», and argued that current climate change is within natural variations.

For the hypothesis that human carbon dioxide emissions are causing dangerous global warming has failed the tests to which it has been subjected.

«We, the undersigned, having assessed the relevant scientific evidence, do not find convincing support for the hypothesis that human emissions of carbon dioxide are causing, or will in the foreseeable future cause, dangerous global warming.»