So if a colleague of mind does something that I think has
dangerous implications on a global scale, and as a result, I write to them and tell them my opinion, and tell them that I won't continue to collaborate with them in the future, and you think that is tantamount to dragging them before HUAC, blacklisting them, and imprisoning them based on sometimes completely unsubstantiated claims about their political beliefs?
Your arrogance to believe you know what constitutes «
dangerous implications on a global scale.»
Not exact matches
The teacher's approach to such problems might start from three assumptions: (a) the teacher should be concerned with how science fits into the larger framework of life, and the student should raise questions about the meaning of what he studies and its relation to other fields; (b) controversial questions can be treated, not in a spirit of indoctrination, but with an emphasis
on asking questions and helping students think through assumptions and
implications; an effort should be made to present viewpoints other than one's own as fairly as possible, respecting the integrity of the student by avoiding undue imposition of the lecturer's beliefs; (c) presuppositions inevitably enter the classroom presentation of many subjects, so that a viewpoint frankly and explicitly recognized may be less
dangerous than one which is hidden and assumed not to exist.
And though there are obvious
dangerous to the public shame machine, there are also important
implications: We can no longer choose to be ignorant or oblivious to crimes and sins of the artists and cultural figures that we've also put
on a pedestal.
The
implication is that birth is
dangerous and that we are willing to take
on a tremendous risk to do it anywhere but a hospital.
Jyoti Fernandes of Take the Flour Back, the group that threatened to destroy the GM wheat, said
on the program that she considered such research «really
dangerous» and urged the scientists to «look at the wider social and cultural
implications of GM agriculture.
The not - at - all - benign
implication of inaccurate breed identification is those dogs misidentified as any one of a number of breeds that are perceived, based primarily
on media hype, as
dangerous, aggressive, yappy, nippy or whatever.
Although President Obama defended the new rules
on the basis that they were necessary to prevent
dangerous climate change, that time was running out to do so, and that the rules would protect human health of US citizens, the speech failed to develop some of the obvious profound
implications for climate policy of the conclusion that climate change is a moral problem, although President Obama did assert twice in the speech that climate change is a moral problem.
The world is
on track to reach
dangerous levels of global warming much sooner than expected, according to new Australian research that highlights the alarming
implications of rising energy demand.
As detailed in this new Reason piece, headlined «Ross Ulbricht Files Appeal to the Supreme Court
on His Life Sentence Without Parole: Silk Road founder's appeal stresses the
dangerous Fourth and Sixth Amendment
implications of his prosecution and sentencing,» a notable federal criminal defendant is bringing some notable issues to the Supreme Court via a new cert petition.