January 2012 Confidential Memo: 2012 Heartland Climate Strategy Given the increasingly important role the Heartland Institute is playing in leading the fight to prevent the implementation of
dangerous policy actions to address the supposed risks of global warming, it is useful to set priorities for our efforts in 2012.
Not exact matches
Over the years, the more I learned, the more sceptical I became, I don't believe at this stage that the massive economic costs incurred by proposed anti-AGW
policies can be justified, and that if it is proven to be a serious issue, then dealing with it is better deferred until economic growth and potential technological breakthroughs would make the cost more feasible, if and only if it had been demonstrated that (a) AGW were real; (b) the costs of inaction were enormous; and (c) the costs of
action would bring commensurate benefits, e.g. would stop or long defer
dangerous warming.
Among other things, for instance, the parties to the UNFCCC agreed that: (a) They would adopt
policies and measures to prevent
dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system, (b) Developed countries should take the first steps to do this, and (c) Nations have common but differentiated responsibilities to prevent climate change, (d) Nations may not use scientific uncertainty as an excuse for not taking
action, and (e) Nations should reduce their GHG emissions based upon «equity.»
One of the reasons the world is now running out of time to prevent
dangerous climate change is because fossil fuel companies and their allies in the US Congress has prevented the United States from taking serious
action on climate change since 1992 when the George H. W Bush administration agreed in the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change that the United States should adopt
policies and measures to prevent
dangerous anthropocentric interference on climate change on the basis of equity and common but differentiated responsibilities.
(a) They would adopt
policies and measures to prevent
dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system; (b) Developed countries should take the first steps to prevent
dangerous climate change; (c) Nations have common but differentiated responsibilities to prevent climate change; (d) Nations may not use scientific uncertainty as an excuse for not taking
action; and, (e) Nations should reduce their ghg emissions based upon «equity.»
Nine leading non-profit conservation organizations — 5 Gyres Institute, Algalita, Californians Against Waste, Clean Production
Action, Plastic Pollution Coalition, Responsible Purchasing Network, The Story of Stuff Project, Surfrider Foundation, and UPSTREAM
Policy — joined together to produce the Plastics BAN (Better Alternatives Now) List, a series of reports that identify the world's most
dangerous plastics in order to better protect our oceans and environment.
The
policies desired by the EPA but which have no chance of being passed by the legislatures will be sued into place using the same «sue and settle» procedure that resulted in CO2 being declared a
dangerous pollutant subject to MANDATORY regulation by the EPA, «forcing» the EPA to implement the
policy that it wanted but couldn't get through legislative
action.