Sentences with phrase «dangerous premises cases»

Moreover, in dangerous premises cases the defendants may also include a manager, contractor, or even a tenant.

Not exact matches

Schools need a coherent strategy for lockdown procedures in case of a dangerous event taking place on their premises, a teaching union said.

Some restrictions that various versions of BSL impose are: - muzzling and leashing in public - muzzling and leashing in cars - extra-short leash lengths - automatic dangerous or vicious dog designation, without any bite history - banning from city parks and beaches where other breeds are allowed - banning from leash - free parks where other breeds are allowed - banning completely from jurisdiction (although sometimes existing dogs are allowed to stay)- special (i.e., more expensive) licensing and jurisdiction - wide registry - special tags identifying the dog as a restricted dog - mandatory microchipping and photograph - mandatory insurance (often one million dollars) for each individual dog on the premises - mandatory signage indicating the presence of the dog on the owner's property - mandatory secure enclosures (in some cases, mandatory chaining)- mandatory spay / neuter (to eventually eliminate the breed entirely)- higher fines and / or jail time if a restricted breed bites or menaces - fines and / or jail time for any infraction of any provision regarding restricted breeds - age limit for walking the dog in public - persons with criminal records not allowed to own a restricted breed - ability of law enforcement to stop owners on the street just to check the dog's status - ability of law enforcement to seize dogs without proof of wrongdoing - ability of law enforcement to enter an owner's home, with or without a warrant, to investigate and / or seize a dog

Premises liability cases include slip and falls in commercial or retail establishments where dangerous conditions exist.

There have also been several recent cases in California where courts have upheld personal injury claims against landlords who have allowed a tenant to have a dangerous dog on premises.

Car accidents and injuries on damaged or dangerous premises are examples of common personal injury cases we handle.

Florida judges recognize that places which invite people onto the property for profit (from a dorm room to a bar) have a duty to protect that invited guest from dangerous conditions on that property — and if the guest is a victim of violent crime, then the Florida courts have been willing to award damages in this unique kind of premises liability case in a variety of circumstances.

The experienced Kansas City, Missouri premises liability accident attorneys of Monsees & Mayer P.C have effectively represented clients injured in many types of dangerous product and premises cases, with no two being the same.

In cases where the dangerous condition on a premises is open and obvious, people should reasonably be able to become aware of the danger and avoid it.

Proving that a property owner acted carelessly in a premises liability case often requires gathering detailed evidence about the condition of the property and whether or not the property owner knew or had reason to know that the dangerous condition existed.

In the case of premises liability law, you will also need to establish that either the dangerous condition:

Each type of case is unique as liability may involve building, electrical or other safety codes or simply turn on whether the landowner knew or should have known of the dangerous condition on his premises.

With the right dangerous premises lawyer, you will know the best legal remedies for your specific case.

In denying summary judgment to GE and granting summary judgment to Boston Edison, the Court found that: (1) while the construction work performed by GE met the definition of an improvement to real property for purposes of the statute of repose, public policy considerations necessitated an exception to the application of the statute in cases involving alleged asbestos - related disease; (2) the installation of asbestos insulation was not an abnormally dangerous activity; (3) Boston Edison did not exercise sufficient control over the work at issue to be held negligent; and (4) a premises owner, such as Boston Edison, has no duty to warn where the subcontractor has knowledge of the hazard which is equal to or greater than that of the premises owner.

Anytime you are at the pool with kids, make sure the pool premises is never without the supervision of an adult in case any dangerous situations arise.

Premises liability cases are not limited to a property owner's duty to warn of hazardous or dangerous conditions.

On appeal, the Third District affirmed by relying on the general rule that «a no - accident history of the location of a premises liability case may be admitted into evidence for a variety of purposes including the central one of showing that the area was not in fact dangerous or defective.»

In order to establish a premises liability case, you will need to prove that the property owner owed you a duty of care, that the property owner breached that duty by leaving his property unreasonably dangerous, and that you suffered an injury as a result.

The second type of case we litigate involves injury to our clients, due to a dangerous condition that is present on the premises.

In order to be liable under the theory of Premises Liability, the owner of land (or occupier, as the case may be) must have notice of the dangerous condition.