Sentences with phrase «dangerous warming levels»

To fully understand the nature of the harm caused by this delay it is necessary to understand the policy implications of a «carbon budget» that must limit global emissions to avoid dangerous warming levels..

Not exact matches

One problem is that dangerous levels of climate change are exacerbated by positive feedback loops — changes that release more greenhouse gases from nature due to warming driven by humans.

The big question is will they be enough to help keep global warming below 2 °C, a politically agreed threshold generally deemed to represent the level of dangerous climate change.

Many governments believe that holding the average global temperature rise caused by man - made warming to 2 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels gives the world the best chance to avoid dangerous climate change.

Further climate negotiations in the years ahead will aim to keep warming below that dangerous level.

And «finally, no one can say with any certainty what constitutes a dangerous level of warming, and therefore what level must be avoided.»

CCS has the potential to stave off dangerous levels of global warming, but its deployment is not yet widespread.

But fast foods can be kept warm for long periods after cooking, long enough for bacteria to multiply to dangerous levels.

The world is warming, humans are behind most of the warming, and continued spewing of greenhouse gases would warm the world to dangerous levels by as early as midcentury, the report finds.

WHEN it comes to avoiding dangerous rises in sea level, every little bit of global warming we can avert will make a difference.

Water temperatures off Australia rose to levels dangerous to corals starting in 2014 as a result of global warming and El Niño.

Climate modeling and observational data suggest the world is already on track to reach dangerous levels of warming by the end of the century, according to the two papers.

As a consequence, mitigation efforts to minimize future greenhouse - gas emissions can successfully restrict future warming to a level that may avoid dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system.

«Science tells us that we can not say with any certainty what constitutes a dangerous level of warming, and therefore what level must be avoided,» Paula Dobriansky, under secretary of state for global affairs and the leader of the American delegation, said in her remarks to the conference.»

They tend to believe that as the planet warms, low - level cloud cover will increase, thus increasing planetary albedo (overall reflectiveness of the Earth), offsetting the increased greenhouse effect and preventing a dangerous level of global warming from occurring.

Scientists consider that level of global warming dangerous, and the goal of the Paris Climate Agreement is to stop global warming before that limit is reached.

«Projecting to the future, to stabilise the climate system at a warming level that is not dangerous does require large cuts in carbon dioxide emissions and soon.

UN biodiversity chief tells Climate Home protecting and restoring ecosystems is the best way to protect the world from dangerous levels of global warming

These time scales are within the lifetime of anthropogenic CO2, and thus these feedbacks must be considered in estimating the dangerous level of global warming.

Given the unprecedented rapidity of the human - made climate forcing, it is difficult to establish how soon slow feedbacks will become important, but clearly slow feedbacks should be considered in assessing the «dangerous» level of global warming, as discussed in the next section.

It's a long paper with a long title: «Ice melt, sea level rise and superstorms: evidence from paleoclimate data, climate modeling, and modern observations that 2 oC global warming could be dangerous».

«Ice melt, sea level rise and superstorms: evidence from paleoclimate data, climate modeling, and modern observations that 2o C global warming could be dangerous»

The full title is: «Ice melt, sea level rise and superstorms: evidence from paleoclimate data, climate modeling, and modern observations that 2 o C global warming could be dangerous ``.

The Framework Convention [6] does not define a dangerous level for global warming or an emissions limit for fossil fuels.

On a warm, sunny day windows collect light, trapping heat inside the vehicle, and pushing the temperature inside to dangerous levels.

On a warm day, temperatures inside a vehicle can rise rapidly to dangerous levels.

The smallest warming / sea level rise in TAR figure 5 will place a wide range of human and natural systems under very considerable pressure (and based on estimates of the melt - down point for greenland place us teetering on the edge of dangerous climate change).

As the Padilla abstract suggests, it would only raise the ppmv level at which we would expect dangerous warming....

However, I'd still continue to mitigate AGW, since there would still be some level (somewhat higher) at which dangerous warming could occur.

To stand the best chance of keeping the planetary warming below an internationally agreed target of 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit above preindustrial levels and thus avoiding the most dangerous effects of climate change, the panel found, only about 1 trillion tons of carbon can be burned and the resulting gas spewed into the atmosphere.

However, this in itself is not enough to define what level of warming is «dangerous,» especially since the projections of actual impacts for any level of warming are highly uncertain, and depend on further factors such as how quickly these levels are reached (so how long ecosystems and society have had to respond), and what other changes are associated with them (eg: carbon dioxide concentration, since this affects plant photosynthesis and water use efficiency, and ocean acidification).

It then becomes hard to see how the world would avoid dangerous warming and a dangerous rise in sea level, he said.

I feel bad that Mr. Revkin couldn't get the administration to bite on what even some global warming scientists admit is an irrelevant, and most feel unquantifiable, «dangerous» level of global warming.

On July 23, I wrote about the rocky rollout, prior to peer review, of «Ice Melt, Sea Level Rise and Superstorms: Evidence from Paleoclimate Data, Climate Modeling, and Modern Observations that 2 °C Global Warming is Highly Dangerous.»

When the degree and basis of «global warming» is so unclear, it is of course impossible to define a «dangerous» level of warming.

Of course, this all depends on climate sensitivity and what is regarded as a dangerous level of warming, as discussed on other posts on this site.

How does the Bush administration intend to live up to the president's stated commitment, while refusing to define a dangerous level of warming?

Further, it if could be proven that all those French people died because of global warming, wouldn't most people agree that the dangerous level of warming has been reached?

Also, I doubt that what constitutes a dangerous level of warming requiring action can be defined in the near future by assessing the risk of a THC shutdown given some level of GHGs in the atmosphere.

«Science tells us that we can not say with any certainty what constitutes a dangerous level of warming, and therefore what level must be avoided,» Paula Dobriansky, under secretary of state for global affairs and the leader of the American delegation, said in her remarks to the conference.»

The existing anthropogenic excess of atmospheric CO2 is self - evidently already causing dangerous warming so we do need to draw it down to preindustrial levels as quickly as possible.

First is what Victor calls the scientist's myth, the idea that a clearer, stronger, louder scientific consensus about what level of warming is dangerous will change politics.

After years of resisting efforts to define a dangerous level of warming in international climate discussions, the United States joined with the rest of the world's major industrial powers on Wednesday in a (non-binding) pledge to avoid warming the planet beyond a threshold long favored by European governments and many climate campaigners as a no - go zone.

The ’10 year» horizon is the point by which serious efforts will need to have started to move the trajectory of concentrations away from business - as - usual towards the alternative scenario if the ultimate warming is to stay below «dangerous levels».

Reefs: Natural temperature - limiting processes may prevent ocean surface waters from warming past levels dangerous to corals, at least in some important regions, according to a study being published in Geophysical Research Letters on Saturday.

And it's not because humanity is any less likely to overshoot the 2 - degree Celsius target that spells dangerous levels of global warming.

Unlike Trump, Tillerson says he accepts the science of climate change, although he doesn't hold out much hope of limiting dangerous levels of global warming.

[17] Three, the 2 °C line, which was once taken to be reasonably safe, is now widely seen (at least among the scientists) to mark the approximate point of transition from «dangerous» to «extremely dangerous,» and possibly to altogether unmanageable levels of warming.

We conclude that 2 ◦ C global warming above the preindustrial level, which would spur more ice shelf melt, is highly dangerous.

The president - elect of the Maldives, a nation of 1,200 low islands in the Indian Ocean, is planning to establish an investment fund with some of its earnings from tourism so it can buy a haven for its citizens should global warming raise sea levels at a dangerous pace, according to several news reports.