In fact, there is broad agreement among climate scientists not only that climate change is real (a survey and a review of the scientific literature published say about 97 percent agree), but that we must respond to
the dangers of a warming planet.
In fact, there is broad agreement among climate scientists not only that climate change is real (a survey and a review of the scientific literature published say about 97 percent agree), but that we must respond to
the dangers of a warming planet.
The claim, which Mann himself uses in the NYT, for example, that 97 % of scientists agree that «climate change is real» and that «we must respond to
the dangers of a warming planet» isn't borne out by a reading of the survey, which was itself imprecise about its own definitions, and captures the perspectives Mann has himself dismissed as «anti-science»: sceptics are part of the putative ’97 per cent».
We deserve a Congress that takes seriously
the dangers of a warming planet to our health, economy, and national security.
Not exact matches
The inquiry aims to find out whether the oil company was aware
of the
dangers of human - made climate change but chose to keep quiet and to promote denial groups challenging the scientific consensus that greenhouse gas emissions are
warming the
planet.
Some, such as the sceptics S. Fred Singer and Dennis Avery, see no
danger at all, maintaining that a
warmer planet will be beneficial for mankind and other species on the
planet and that «corals, trees, birds, mammals, and butterflies are adapting well to the routine reality
of changing climate».
Other serious researchers in the field, while convinced
of the building long - term
danger, warn that nature will almost surely jostle chaotically through cool and
warm spells along the way to what Dr. Hansen calls «a different
planet.»
«There's No Way Around It: Donald Trump Looks Like a Disaster for the
Planet --»... all the fragile but important progress the world has made on global
warming over the past eight years is now in
danger of being blown up.»»
The
danger posed by war to all
of humanity - and to our
planet - is at least matched by the climate crisis and global
warming.
Supporters
of the accord, including some leading U.S. business figures, called Trump's move a blow to international efforts to tackle
dangers for the
planet posed by global
warming.
Analysts say the
planet is still on course to heat beyond the 2C
danger zone by 2100, although around 0.9 C
of warming will have been avoided thanks to the new plans.
In fact, he said he thought climate change was in
danger of becoming a «fetish» and that rallying cries to «save the
planet by limiting global
warming to 2 degrees» could distract us from the «political logjam» in front
of us.
With barely a day going by without another gloomy global
warming story making the headlines, it is difficult to know what it will take for the current US administration to wake up to the
dangers of climate change - or to predict what effects our abuse
of the
planet will have on us, or our children.