They are talking about
the dangers of anthropogenic global warming, but include the sea level rise from all warming effects, most of which occured long before we were burning fossil fuels at anywhere near current rates.
A recent survey of climate change literature for 2017 revealed that the alleged «consensus» behind
the dangers of anthropogenic global warming is not nearly as settled among climate scientists as people imagine.
In January of this year, author Kenneth Richard conducted a broad survey of climate change literature for 2017 and found that the alleged «consensus» behind
the dangers of anthropogenic global warming is not nearly as settled among climate scientists as people imagine.
However, with a peer review system, it is not possible to take the second option and as a result,
the dangers of anthropogenic global warming have gone by default.
To minimise
the danger of anthropogenic global warming (AGW) by carbon dioxide emissions, international institutions require an investment of about 10 times the material cost of the entire World War II within the next few decades.
Not exact matches
There is no evidence whatsoever that «politics» in any way, shape or form has influenced actual climate science, or its overwhelming conclusions regarding both the reality
of anthropogenic global warming and the
danger that it poses to humanity and to life on earth in general.
A graph we posted back in April shows the
danger of looking at ENO to substantiate claims made about
anthropogenic global warming.
The devotees
of both sides
of the mainstream climate debate i.e. on the one hand those who warn against the
dangers of global warming, which they attribute mainly to atmospheric emissions
of carbon dioxide, and on the other those who assert that the theory
of anthropogenic global warming is a fraud, resort to hysteria when they sense that their ideas are under threat.
There is no evidence whatsoever that «politics» in any way, shape or form has influenced actual climate science, or its overwhelming conclusions regarding both the reality
of anthropogenic global warming and the
danger that it poses to humanity and to life on earth in general.
I do not mean to use the term «denier» pejoratively — it has been accepted by some
of the group as a self - description — but simply to designate those who deny any likelihood
of future
danger from
anthropogenic global warming.