Despite such insights, physicists remain in
the dark about dark energy's origin.
Not exact matches
Discovering more
about dark energy will «hopefully lead to a revolution in gravity and quantum mechanics,» Butterworth said.
Current questions
about dark energy and
dark matter present the perfect opportunity for God to enlighten Christians
about that stuff while scientists are still scratching their heads.
These two big unknowns —
dark matter and
dark energy — are estimated to make up
about 95 percent of the universe.
I've read the book of Job several times, I have yet to see anything
about dark matter or
dark energy, you are a moron for even posulating this.
Watched a great tv programme last night
about dark matter and then «
dark energy» and «
dark flow».
But atheism which worships science as the only viable path is in such ignorance of the state of science itself, given that 95 % of the Universe is made of
dark matter and
dark energy which science knows absolutely nothing
about, and other possible dimensions of existence which are utterly beyond sceintific understanding except in theory, all that makes atheistic blind conviction in science a form of religion in itself.
An atheist in this discipline would look at a probability of 10 to the power of 97 in the fine tuning of
dark energy influence over expansion of the universe and understand to different degree what that says
about the first cause or singularity.
I mispoke earlier
about dark energy though.
Dark energy and
Dark matter are 99 % of the universe, so Ross is simply wrong
about that.
That old argument came
about before
dark energy was discovered which requires the first cause to be outside of our 4 dimensions in order for the theory of relativity to hold.
«But if we're going to be the people who lead the Democratic Party back from the wilderness and lead our country out of this
dark time, then we can't waste
energy arguing
about whose issue matters more and who in our...
One thing we heard
about that day was
Dark Energy.
Perlmutter adds: «There's been around one paper
about dark energy every day by a theorist for the past 12 years.»
As the cosmos expanded, matter gradually spread out, and its gravitational grip weakened, hitting a balance with
dark energy about 5 billion years ago, causing the expansion to coast at a steady rate for a while, neither accelerating nor slowing down.
Astronomers need to know a few more things
about dark energy, though.
How are we going to find out more
about what
dark energy really is?
These annihilations can produce gamma rays with a very unique
energy spectrum which, if observed, will be the «smoking gun» of
dark - matter particle interactions and will teach us a lot
about the nature and properties of the
dark - matter particle.»
The same can't be said
about dark energy, a truly astonishing discovery made by astronomers a decade ago while observing distant exploding stars.
Although little is known
about dark energy, its density is expected to change slowly or not at all as the universe expands.
At the time the BOSS program was planned,
dark energy had been previously determined to significantly influence the expansion of the Universe starting
about 5 billion years ago.
Still a bundle of
energy, Mackey enthuses
about the future of pain treatment in general, calling current technology «the
dark ages».
The detection of gravitational waves emanating from two colliding neutron stars has implications for the mysterious
dark energy that makes up
about 70 percent of the universe, Emily Conover reported in «This year's neutron star collision unlocks cosmic mysteries» (SN: 12/23/17 & 1/6/18, p. 19).
New measurements of how fast the universe is speeding apart suggest that the one thing we thought we knew
about dark energy is wrong.
Charlie Baker was confused
about the amounts of
dark energy and
dark matter that make up the cosmos.
The main goal of the
Dark Energy Survey (DES), as its name suggests, is to better understand the nature of dark energy, the mysterious stuff that makes up about 70 percent of the matter and energy in the unive
Dark Energy Survey (DES), as its name suggests, is to better understand the nature of dark energy, the mysterious stuff that makes up about 70 percent of the matter and energy in the uni
Energy Survey (DES), as its name suggests, is to better understand the nature of
dark energy, the mysterious stuff that makes up about 70 percent of the matter and energy in the unive
dark energy, the mysterious stuff that makes up about 70 percent of the matter and energy in the uni
energy, the mysterious stuff that makes up
about 70 percent of the matter and
energy in the uni
energy in the universe.
«This is another clue,» Riess says, «and we know so little
about dark energy that anything we can find out is important.»
About half of them were discovered in 2005 and 2006 by the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, the precursor to the
Dark Energy Survey.
One of them accounts for so - called
dark energy, which comprises
about 70 per cent of the total
energy of the universe and is responsible for its accelerated expansion.
To find out more
about the elusive particles and their potential links to cosmic evolution, invisible
dark matter and matter's dominance over antimatter in the universe, the Department of
Energy's SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory is taking on key roles in four neutrino experiments: EXO, DUNE, MicroBooNE and ICARUS.
Most everything in the universe is made up of
dark matter and
dark energy — two invisible, mysterious materials that scientists know very little
about.
The mass scale is roughly
about the same thing, so there are theories in which
dark energy is connected to neutrinos.
Doesn't the fact that there is so much talk
about dark energy and...
[He's] absolutely right, of course, and we may be lucky, and I hope we are lucky; what Alan said is, I want to emphasize something
about the negative features of what Alan said, [which] is that if the vacuum
energy is
dark energy, we won't be able to prove it is
dark energy.
The other potentially exciting thing
about dark energy is that it might be connected to very small particles called neutrinos.
Some of the fine - tuning appears extreme enough to be quite embarrassing — for example, we need to tune the
dark energy to
about 123 decimal places to make habitable galaxies.
Calculations showed that most galaxies (and therefore most observers) are in regions where the
dark energy is
about the same as the density of matter at the epoch of galaxy formation.
By changing our assumptions
about dark energy we can radically modify our constraints on the shape of the universe.
These are key to making cosmological predictions
about properties in our own universe such as the strength of
dark energy.
Thus the Sloan results bolster current ideas
about dark matter, much as they confirmed the reality of
dark energy.
As we learn more
about dark energy and its effect on the expansion of space and time, we find that
dark energy and the shape, or geometry, of the universe are worryingly intertwined.
Scientists know too little
about dark energy to determine with any certainty whether the universe's fate is a Big Chill, a Big Rip, or neither.
In
about 100 billion years, as future humans are enjoying an extended stay near Proxima Centauri, some physicists like Starkman believe that
dark energy will drastically stretch out the vast amounts of empty space between the Milky Way and other galaxies, creating an impassable gulf between them.
Current theory predicts that
dark energy would slightly heat the CMB radiation passing through dense regions of galaxies called superclusters, each
about a half - billion light - years across.
In addition, scientists working on the JDEM designs have not presented a unified front, owing to disagreements over the best observational method to use (see «Hunting for
dark energy»)-- at a time when an influential astrophysics panel is
about to prioritize the next decade's best and most organized missions.
Combined with other cosmological experiments, we can learn
about dark energy and put tight constraints on the curvature of the universe — it's very flat!»
Dark energy is
about 120 orders of magnitude weaker than theorists calculate it should be (SN Online: 11/18/13), a mismatch that makes scientists uncomfortable.
«The fact that we're learning something
about dark energy because of this measurement is incredibly exciting,» he says.
I should maybe add, I don't think Lawrence really said it, the most peculiar thing
about this
dark energy, is really the fact that there is so little of it.
Well it goes down in the sense [that] it gets a little more focused as well; now know what's happening is this brain
dark energy, which scientists call the brain default mode network — and they use the word default because when you're not doing anything else — this is background brain activity that is constantly occurring is all
about the brain anticipating and predicting what'll happen next in the environment.