Not exact matches
IPCC faces more criticism from politicians than ever: In the wake of the revelations
about the Himalayan
glaciers data, the U.K. director of Greenpeace called for Pachauri to step down; so has Senator John Barrasso (R - WY) and others.
The endeavor becomes more scientifically challenging in light of the large variety of information sources
about past climate, including tree rings, coral,
glacier ice, and marine and lake sediments, not to mention the complicated array of
data that are used to establish the timelines that underlie the paleoclimate records.
Less is known
about southwest Greenland
glaciers due to a lack of ice thickness
data but the
glaciers have accelerated there as well and are likely to be strongly out of balance despite thickening of the interior.
Oerlemans's reconstruction of global temperatures (largely from mid latitude
glaciers) is entirely independent of the much talked
about temperature records from other paleoclimate proxy
data (e.g. Moberg and others, Mann and others, Crowley and others).
The people who study tree rings, those who study borehole temperatures, those who set up and monitor temperature stations, those who study
glaciers, sometimes risking their lives, are gathering that basic factual
data about the world.
Given all the oversimplified assertions over the years
about Himalayan
glaciers in a warming global climate, it's great to see a committee assembled by the National Academy of Sciences weigh in on the question with some data - based findings in a new report, «Himalayan Glaciers: Climate Change, Water Resources, and Water Security
glaciers in a warming global climate, it's great to see a committee assembled by the National Academy of Sciences weigh in on the question with some
data - based findings in a new report, «Himalayan
Glaciers: Climate Change, Water Resources, and Water Security
Glaciers: Climate Change, Water Resources, and Water Security.»
The source document, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 2007 Fourth Assessment Report (AR4), has been under harsh scrutiny over the past weeks for a number of blunders, including the Climategate scandal, bogus claims
about Himalayan
glacier melt, false assertions The Netherlands are drowning, deceptive hysteria over conditions in the Amazon, exaggerations of vanishing polar ice caps, and fraudulent cover - up of Chinese temperature
data.
The report contained misleading
data about the melting rate of
glaciers in the Himalayas and is riddled with citations to
data furnished by activist groups, non-scientific journals and material that was never peer - reviewed.
For most of the 2000s, satellite
data shows the
glaciers lost
about as much ice as they gained, meaning they stayed roughly stable.
The melt - off from the world's ice sheets, ice caps and
glaciers over eight years of the past decade would have been enough to cover the United States in
about 18 inches (46 centimeters) of water, according to new research based on the most - comprehensive analysis of satellite
data yet.
The tree - ring
data match other information
about long - term climate change, like the
data from ice cores drilled out of ancient
glaciers.
Usually there's nothing extraordinary
about a
glacier calving, said glaciologist Ted Scambos of the National Snow and Ice
Data Center (NSIDC) in Boulder, Colorado.
Climate scientists had refused to reveal their
data or show their workings, and several alarming claims
about climate change, such as the rapid melting of Himalayan
glaciers, were found to be groundless.
Hasnain told Pearce he had
data about a portion of the Himalayan
glaciers he feared were at risk.
According to
data gleaned via NASA's Ice Bridge aerial survey, the
glacier is giving up 46 gigatons of water every year, or
about a single Chesapeake Bay every two years.
Tune in to gain a clearer understanding of the geological, climatological, and historical
data, and get the facts straight
about the Arctic, ice, ice sheets, and
glaciers once and for all.
[Various aspersions
about gravy trains, religion, «not sharing
data»,
glaciers not melting, etc..
Figure 4: While
data are lacking for a good understanding of the patterns of change in the
glaciers of the Himalayas, there are some generalizations that can be made
about the different regions of this vast area.
In 2002, the Larsen B ice shelf collapsed; in 2003, the World Glacial Monitoring Service reported that «The recent increase in the rates of ice loss over reduced
glacier surface areas as compared with earlier losses related to larger surface areas (cf. the thorough revision of available
data by Dyurgerov, 2002) becomes even more pronounced and leaves no doubt
about the accelerating change in climatic conditions.»
Global mass balance
data are transformed to sea - level equivalent by first multiplying the ice thickness (meters) lost to melting by the density of ice (
about 900 kilograms per cubic meter), to obtain a water equivalent thickness, and then multiplying by the surface area of these «small»
glaciers (
about 760,000 square kilometers).