Teacher personnel data include teacher - level
data about tenure status, years of experience in the district, demographic information, level of education attained, and certification status.
Not exact matches
It turns out that this may be one of those rare cases where Canadian
data are richer than American
data: the Labour Force Survey has been asking
about job
tenure since 1976, and we can focus on more tightly - defined age groups.
They could make a much better decision
about which teachers to retain for
tenure if they had an extra few years of
data.
School districts also are under increasing pressure to gather
data about teacher performance as part of a related effort to address teacher
tenure and in some cases are tied to decisions
about pay increments.
During my
tenure with the school district, I was struck by the frequency with which educators applied this selective skepticism to
data about students» performance.
And it began requiring principals to justify their decisions
about whether to grant or deny
tenure — particularly if it didn't match up with the
data.
There's a national conversation underway
about teacher
tenure, and nearly half the states and the District of Columbia are already overhauling their teacher evaluation processes so that they are tied more directly to student testing
data.
This district is to use these
data, along with student growth ratings, to inform decisions
about teachers»
tenure, retention, and pay - for - performance system, in compliance with the state's still current teacher evaluation system.
2009 - 2010 New York City starts including value - added
data in decisions
about whether to grant
tenure to teachers.
Although I disagree I do appreciate you taking the time to add to the discussion — what
about the E4E pledge that members are supposed to sign — Teachers who join E4E are expected to support value - added test - score
data in evaluations, higher hurdles to achieving
tenure, the elimination of seniority - driven layoffs, school choice, and merit pay.
I also explained I don't have any real beefs with ice core
data but if you want to state something specific I'm sure I can find something to cast doubt upon it as very little in this debate is writ in granite, confirmation bias is rampant, overconfidence abounds, the race to publish by inexperienced youngsters on the
tenure track is heated, and pal review let's just
about anything that supports the consensus view get published while simultaneously quashing anything contrary.
Maybe if the AGW proponents stopped calling those skeptical of their hypotheses «deniers», and did something
about the continued
tenure of those who engaged in unscientific practises such as
data bending, opaque statistical massaging and weighting, email deletion, undermining the peer review process and subverting journal editor's independence, then the big bad nasty «deniers» might stop using the «Alarmist» tag and highlighting climategate.
Human resources information systems that give companies reams of
data about employees»
tenure, trajectories and retention patterns, plus years» worth of executive assessments, are giving rise to new insights in talent development and CEO hiring.