Sentences with phrase «data is correct»

They must verify that the data is correct and up to date.

Accountants prepare and analyze financial records, making sure all data is correct and that taxes are paid on time and in the right amount.

Essential Duties and Responsibilities - Data Integrity: - Ensuring data is correct across Accounts...

CLANTON MEDICAL CENTER, Clanton, AL (1/2010 to 5/2013) Front Desk Officer • Greeted patients, families and visitors and provided them with information regarding the facility • Assisted in filling out admission and insurance forms and ensured that all acquired data is correct • Provided visitors with directions to patients» rooms, wards and treatment rooms • Handled telephone exchange by providing information and transferring calls • Coordinated patient services such as assignment of doctors, payment handling and provision of medical services

Due to the rise in storage options like cloud computing, it has become easier for companies to store colossal amounts of data which is collected and received from many sources like the internet, corporate systems, online unstructured sources etc..., however storing data does not assure you that the data is correct.

«Rather than a single central authority demanding trust and declaring: «I say this data is correct,» you have the distributed consensus of everyone in the chain, saying in unison: «we agree that this data is correct.

One is where the majority of the data is correct, and we see the beaming visage of Kindly Uncle H, who cures all ills of man, beast, and missing metadata.

But based on withholding tests, it is far more statistically likely that our results are closer to the truth — assuming the underlying station data is correct and that the covariance structure of the satellite data is a good proxy for the covariance structure of near - surface air temperature measurements.

If the problematic data is correct, the earth's magnetic field is not generated in the core.)

I don't know this Dave Manuel guy and can't comment on the data quality, but let's assume the data is correct for a moment.

But others disagree about the role of humans, about whether the data is correct, or even real.

If their empirical data is correct, then it follows that the moon does not behave in accordance with BB calculations.

If your data is correct and NASA's is not then why haven't you tried to contact them to get them to fix their data?

This leaves them in something of a quandary: simple logic dictates that if their hypothesis is correct, then they have no way of knowing whether an equation they use for calibrating the paleo data is correct.

Any significant remainder of sea level rise, if their data is correct, would then show that there's warming in the deep oceans.

Also, running your calculations with other, unrelated sets of tree - ring data might help to decide if my layman's impression (merely from looking at the «age effects» curve) that something is fishy with the 300 + year part of the present data is correct, or if very old trees generally show this kind of erratic growth pattern and my suspicions are thus unfounded and your «year effects» curve correct as - is.

So one also has to check that the temperature data is correct.

I can find no fault in this reasoning, assuming of course that the IPCC estimate of pre-Mauna Loa CO2 levels based on ice core data is correct.

The data is correct and accurate.

No one was asking access to lab ans equipment just the data and the code a minimum to: a) check the data is correct.

I only try to make sure that the solar data is correct [hard enough with people wanting to cherry pick old, obsolete, invalid «data»].

Then you say to me, «No, because if you assume Antarctic data is correct, then...».

If this new data is correct then it seems as though we have two processes working against one another.

I don't know if Christy and Spencer's interpretation of the data is correct, but their procedures seem much more reasonable to me than the other intepretations I've read.

How can i confirm if the data is correct?

Checking your credit score allows you to not just monitor your financial performance, but also ensure that all data is correct and that you're not a victim of identity theft.

It will save the credit bureaus money and will allow the creditor to just click one button to verify that their data is correct.

Let say that data is correct and that «readers have problems finding good books = more people read, readers read more» applies.

We strive to ensure that all data is correct and up - to - date, but errors may occasionally occur that affect the accuracy or reliability of such data.

Another individual verifies that the data is correct.

They have one error, calling one of the Alliance Schools a traditional public school, but otherwise their data is correct.

This may seem like common sense but HMRC are really stressing the importance of putting good procedures in place to ensure that employee data is correct.

If the problematic data is correct, the earth's magnetic field is not generated in the core.)

«With any given scientific paper, you hope the data is correct, and ours was excellent.

An error has occurred, make sure all the data is correct and you do not have a registration on this site.

But this assumes that the data is correct.

Mistakes can certainly be made by your supplier, so spend a few minutes checking the terms of your contract and that your usage data is correct to ensure accurate invoicing.

Thus, while are results are correct based on the data provided in the CCD, we have no way of verifying whether the CCD data are themselves correct.

Or the self - reported data are correct and the contractual workday is routinely exceeded by teachers.

The best that they could say is that, given their choice of data sets, ignoring data beyond 2014 and assuming their calculations on that data are correct, it's plausible that temperature rises could be restricted to 1.5 C.

So, if your model looks ok with Mann's data, if Moberg's data are correct your model is badly wrong (and viceversa)!!!!

However, in my paper I have argued that if the long term of the solar variability falls down and the Moberg temperature data are correct, the actual models are very wrong because they will never be able to reproduce the millenaria cycle presented in the Moberg data without a strong climate sensitivity to solar cicle.

Perhaps, this is only an illusion, but if not and if Rasmus data are correct these pattern might suggest that there might be a serious possibility that there is a solar signal hidden in the GHG and Ozone record.

As it turned out, those efforts eventually had some success and the MSU data were corrected to show some warming, albeit less than surface records.

Compared to many models (and assuming the data are correct and the radiative basics of AGW theory are correct), it suggests:

Do you think it's possible the tree ring data was correct up until about 1960 -» 80, and then the data somehow became wrong after that?

It is simply wrong to assume that all the trends in raw data are correct, or that differences between raw and adjusted data are solely due to urban heat influences.

If you had to move office and you thought that you would never go back to your 4 metres ^ 3 of raw data because your computer data was correct.

Once biases in the data were corrected, mainly concerning ocean temperature readings taken by ships, the slowdown disappeared, the paper said

But in June last year, a study in Science claimed that the hiatus was just an artefact which vanishes when biases in temperature data are corrected.