Not exact matches
I followed up this contradiction and the failure to publish the
data with a
Point of Order to the Speaker on 24th June,
in a Westminster Hall
debate on 30th June 2015,
in a letter to the Prime Minister on 14th July,
in a second
Point of Order on 15th July,
in an urgent Written Question to the Prime Minister on 16th July and
in an Urgent Question
in Parliament on 21st July.
The
debate centres on the finer
points of flower architecture, but
points to a broader concern about using statistical models and large
data sets to tackle biological questions, says Pamela Soltis, a plant biologist at the University of Florida
in Gainesville.
The
data on test scores and indicators like graduation rates are generally more complicated than the political
debate allows and there has been progress and it's too often not acknowledged (and cherry picking of NAEP
data is a pandemic
in the ed world to make various
points)...
It moves the conversation from a nebulous
debate on «climate change» to a concrete set of
data points that signal danger
in the rising tides.
The carefully - concealed errors
in the paper, especially when taken together with the University's refusal even to reply to my own questions about the methodology even before it was published, as well as its refusal to order the immediate release of the authors»
data to Professor Tol, would be likely to persuade any jury that a fraud has taken place, for the
points at issue are not complex matters that could be
debated either way.
The use of different
data temperature sets, whether it is global surface temperatures or satellite measurements, is one of the major
points of contention
in the climate
debate.
Which brings me to the
point that surely you can agree with Jennifer on:
In general the public
debate should involve a lot more looking at the actual
data (cf. business & economics reporting) than the «meta -
debate» we so often see currently, and specifically that «ultimately, good policy is going to require that a much larger percentage of Australians have a higher level of scientific literacy.»
[4] The
debating points included the use and misuse of scientific
data in relation to radon, asbestos, global warming, ozone depletion, passive smoking, pesticides, etc..
Speaking to BBC Radio 4's Political Thinking with Nick Robinson podcast - which is available from Friday - Mr Hancock described the outcry over the use of
data as a «turning
point»
in the
debate about online privacy.
A
point of
debate in the Bitcoin community is whether loading
data through OP RETURN can negatively affect the performance of the Bitcoin network with respect to its primary goal.