Sentences with phrase «data points on a graph»

The data points on a graph for some of my struggling readers can look like a patient having a heart attack with the Aimsweb trending line averaging the data.

You basically have four data points on that graph: four decadal rings.

Starting with two closely spaced data points on the graph below, lay a straight - edge between them and notice how for a short period of time you cancreate almost any slope you prefer, simply by being selective about what data points you use.

Not exact matches

Can you record the time taken for the slime to flow between the two points on the viscosity board and plot the data on a graph?

Plotting a graph with suitable combinations of these variables on the two axes, the researchers traced a straight line that coincided almost perfectly with the experimental data points.

To help students grasp that each point represents two values, group members suggested giving students more experience collecting data and plotting it on coordinate graphs using different scales.

The baseline should be recorded on the Progress Monitoring Data Points graphs.

The first graph below, in which each data point relates the average socioeconomic index score for a decile of a particular OECD country's students to that decile's average performance on PISA's math test, depicts this relationship.

Data points that fall in the upper left portion of the graph represent powerful rallies on contracting volume.

That's evident from the graphs I pointed you to, which not only calculate trends, but also present the data on which the trends are based.

In amongst the multimedia examples in the column was one from Teddy TV titled «Trend and variation» — purporting to teach the viewer the difference between trend («an average or general tendency of a series of data points to move in a certain direction over time, represented by a line or curve on a graph») and variation («common cause variation is also known as «noise» or «natural patterns,»» the squiggles on a graph).

For those unsure on that point, here is the graph with the data misplaced on the x-axis as noted by Foster @ 27:

The last data - point will be shown 2.5 - years before the last point on the graph.

Even when the calculation is extended to cover nominally the whole period as is done in your graphs, the latest data point has a weight of 0.67 in the filtered values presented, i.e. less than any of the interior values but more than 0.52, which it would have on the values up to 2010, if 2010 would be a normal interior point.

If I go out and measure something, anything, and plot the points of a piece of graph paper, and the points may lie on a straight line, some sort of curve, or there may be so much noise in the data that no trend is apparent, then this is what fits the data.

They don't start from 1997, the first hadcrut4 data point they plot on the graph is September 1997.

When we add the next 10 year averaged point on the graph, for the year 2012, we will use data from the year 2003 to 2012 inclusive.

I merely wanted to point to the basic data available on the Met office site (an organisation I visit frequently in order to use their archives) and ask those saying Rose was wrong to explain why, in simple terms, when the Met office graphs seemed to show he was basically correct.

No snark here, but which graph would you cite that has a degree of authority, i.e one not manufactured on wood for trees using dubious end points and data.

Derivatives are indicated on the graphs by the elements such as «- diff1» meaning the point differential taken over one data interval (typically one month).

From this starting point, and the data in the graphs above on this page that assume a pre-1800 CO2 level of 280 ppmv, we should be able to determine how many ppmv's of CO2 were emitted by man at any particular year in question, right?

The agt has dropped since 2010 with the average through August, 2011 shown as the most recent data point on the page 5 graph in the pdf made public 9/24/11 (September is looking lower).

I've also shown on the graph the well - established age of the Younger Dryas — note that the Shakun et al. global temperature data points show a dip in temperature (presumably the Younger Dryas) that is considerably younger.

A hint for you Nick, the number of statistically significant points on my graph reflects the temperature data.

dhogaza: Tamino outed himself as Grant Foster at RC when as «guest poster (sic)» on 16 September 2007 he proceeded to plagiarise (if he was not one of the authors) the paper by GF, Annan, Schmidt and Mann which had been submitted to JGR on the 10th; the paper attacked Stephen Schwartz» paper in JGR before that had even appeared; Tamino's graphs required direct access to the data in GF et al, and it would certainly be very odd for Gavin Schmidt to commission the guest posting if not from his co-author, who at one point uses the term «we» confirming that «Tamino» was the lead author.

sod I'm not sure if this is just bored graffiti on your part, but on the off chance that you genuinely are asking if putting a linear trend through the dataset is better than just comparing the start and end points then what this thread is telling you is that this graph / data doesn't have a linear trend in it, so it probably is.

* You might notice that the intervals between points in these data sets are smaller than on other stubs and graphs.