Sentences with phrase «data showing no warming»

For example, the borehole data show warming since about 1500 AD which clearly was not anthropogenic, and in the latest decade, since the very warm 1998, the temperature trend is downward even in the Hadley Center compilations; the most ardent supporters of anthropogenic global warming.

From 1978 to 1996 neither the lower or mid-troposphere data show any warming.

Indeed, Argo data show no warming in the upper ocean over the past four years, but this does not contradict the climate models.

As I wrote, sea surface temperature data show warming.

The data shows warming on the Antarctica Penninsula and slight cooling in the interior.

The ad was illustrated with a doctored version of Lloyd's graph (the inconvenient modern temperature data showing a warming trend had been removed).

It's not that scientists have collected data showing warming, and from it deduced that CO2 is the cause.

Climate change advocates are not attacking the facts of his study, which seem to agree with satellite data showing no warming for over 18 years.

On whether the UAH data shows warming?

Note that he used the past in his sentence «satellite data showed no warming» and then he goes on «The report showed that selective corrections to the atmospheric data could lead to some warming, thus reducing the conflict between observations and models descriptions of what greenhouse warming should look like.»

When data shows no warming for 16 years, that trumps religious belief that CO2 warming must be still accelerating.

As the science continues to mount up against AGW (i.e. latest Aqua satellite data supporting «negative» feedback and GISS, UAH, RSS, Hadley data showing no warming since 1998 and a trend towards cooling), I see «doubters» getting rounder and rounder, and Pachauri, Gore, Hansen, et al getting flatter and flatter.

He says satellite data shows no warming.

http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/ Earth Temperature Data shows no warming for 15 years.

And where Pratt claims there should be no surprise in greenhouse warming in the English Midlands prior to 1880 the actual data show no warming prior to 1880.

For data since 1999, the error margins are so large that it can not be said with any confidence that the data shows warming, cooling or a pause.

Note again that the large error margins means the trends are statistically in agreement, but can not tell whether the data shows a warming or cooling trend.»

Satellite and weather balloon data show warming in the long - term (see the above chart).

Fishery data shows warming in the 1930s coincided with the arrival of fish normally found further south.

Icecap has published the following article: Feb 20, 2009 Satellite Data Show No Warming Before 1997.

It's likely that those proxy data show no warming either.

The UK's Met Office data shows no warming for the past 16 years.

Do not be ready to leap up and shout that there is a cooling phase in action, as the data show the warming continues despite short - term slumps.

I still run into people who argue that satellite data shows no warming, at which point I have to go into my monologue about the corrections to Christy's data.

The basis for selection, obviously, was not whether trees exhibited a hockey stick shape or not; in cases where there are enough instrumental data, the criterion is whether they correlate well to that — too bad the temperature data show warming over the 20th century, I suppose.

in the early part of this decade Bob Carter used to love the Spencer and Cristy's satellite data showing no warming trend but curiously his views did not change when their analysis was shown to be flawed.

And whilst you state you agree the data shows warming, you appear to think there is legitimate cause to doubt the veracity of that data — «as it stands» and «I think there are some chinks in the temperature data» — whilst offering support to those doing the attacking — «a problematic culture of obstruction around any such exploration by sceptics».

Not exact matches

The data also show a land bump, or sill, at the mouth of Skinfaxe glacier, which prevents warmer, deep Atlantic water (yellow on temperature bar) from reaching the ice.

Using these data, researchers fine - tuned estimates from previous foram studies that captured polar conditions to show tropical oceans warmed substantially in the Eocene, but not as much as polar oceans.

RAPID RETREAT New seafloor data reveal that Køge Bugt (shown) and other fast - retreating glaciers in southeastern Greenland sit within deep fjords, allowing warm Atlantic Ocean water to speed up melting.

Unfortunately, this historical data is showing scientists that warming might be worse than we thought.

Preliminary data comparing minimum January temperatures and maximum July temperatures between the 1970s and the past decade also show warmer summers for the western third of the country.

In 2003 the White House instructed the Environmental Protection Agency to delete from its annual Report on the Environment any reference to a study showing that human activity contributes significantly to climate change, and also to delete temperature data showing a worsening warming trend.

The UK Met Office this week published data showing that the first decade of the 2000s has been the warmest on record.

In February, Shindell and colleagues showed that models inflated the warming because they were fed the wrong data.

Data from the AUV also showed slightly warmer water over some of the spires, which implied that they might be active hydrothermal - vent chimneys.

As Stephen C. Riser and M. Susan Lozier note in their February 2013 Scientific American article, «Rethinking the Gulf Stream,» «A comparison of the Argo data with ocean observations from the 1980s, carried out by Dean Roemmich and John Gilson of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography, shows that the upper few hundred meters of the oceans have warmed by about 0.2 degree C in the past 20 years.

But that hasn't stopped British newspaper The Mail on Sunday trying to resurrect a dead duck: this time claiming that scientists at the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) played fast and loose with data on a well - regarded 2015 paper in Science that definitively showed there was no pause in global warming.

The team's data show that during the polar night, indoor heating can bleed into the environment, warming it by as much as 10 degrees Celsius relative to nearby rural sites.

At midsummer, the data shows that the air that has warmed the most is 2 kilometres above land.

Spencer and Braswell had drawn on NASA satellite data to try to show that the atmospheres in climate models retain more heat than the real atmosphere does, causing the models to predict too much warming under a strengthening greenhouse.

Away from those headlines, an equally intense battle is taking place over access to the data showing global warming is real.

(While NOAA's temperatures can vary slightly from NASA's because of the different methods the agencies use for processing data, their numbers are generally very close and both show the same clear warming trend.)

In addition, the data show that the temperature of the innermost ring imaged by the vortex is around 100 Kelvin (or minus 173 Celsius degrees), a bit warmer than our asteroid belt.

Re: # 26, «Would someone please address Steve McIntyre's assertion that none of these studies show late 20th century warming, unless they include a few controversial tree ring data sets?»

U.S. Data Since 1895 Fail To Show Warming Trend LINK WASHINGTON, Jan. 25 — After examining climate data extending back nearly 100 years, a team of Government scientists has concluded that there has been no significant change in average temperatures or rainfall in the United States over that entire perData Since 1895 Fail To Show Warming Trend LINK WASHINGTON, Jan. 25 — After examining climate data extending back nearly 100 years, a team of Government scientists has concluded that there has been no significant change in average temperatures or rainfall in the United States over that entire perdata extending back nearly 100 years, a team of Government scientists has concluded that there has been no significant change in average temperatures or rainfall in the United States over that entire period.

«I don't see the catastrophic effects from warming that others predict,» said John Christy, a professor at the University of Alabama in Huntsville who says satellite data since 1979 shows temperatures rising fastest at the surface.

In the Gulf of Mexico, buoy data from the peak of hurricane season — August through October — shows waters have warmed 1 - 2 °F in the past 40 years alone.

It's almost certain that 2016 will be the second - hottest year on record for the contiguous U.S., with new data showing that November was the second warmest on record for the Lower 48, capping off a record - hot autumn (for the second year in a row).

For global observations since the late 1950s, the most recent versions of all available data sets show that the troposphere has warmed at a slightly greater rate than the surface, while the stratosphere has cooled markedly since 1979.