In Waldman, these materials had been taken from court records and included in a pay - per - use
database by a legal publisher.
Not exact matches
Ruthlessly redefining and refocussing the basic services,
by dropping unused
databases while significantly enhancing others with value - added content, is the option that
legal publishers should pursue.
At this point, outsourcing
by the major commercial
publishers includes everything from housing
databases on «global platforms» to the actual building and updating of
legal databases.
A major commercial advantage should ensue to the
legal publisher that can claim that it has audited its
databases and can clearly state the scope of its
databases in terms that can be easily understood
by the user.
By a «self - help legal software publisher», I mean web - based legal software used directly by consumers to resolve a legal problem or a legal issue through automated legal document assembly applications, expert system applications, decision - tools, intelligent databases, smart calculators, and other software applications that manipulate legal sources and legal information to generate a legal solution for a user from facts provided by the use
By a «self - help
legal software
publisher», I mean web - based
legal software used directly
by consumers to resolve a legal problem or a legal issue through automated legal document assembly applications, expert system applications, decision - tools, intelligent databases, smart calculators, and other software applications that manipulate legal sources and legal information to generate a legal solution for a user from facts provided by the use
by consumers to resolve a
legal problem or a
legal issue through automated
legal document assembly applications, expert system applications, decision - tools, intelligent
databases, smart calculators, and other software applications that manipulate
legal sources and
legal information to generate a
legal solution for a user from facts provided
by the use
by the user.
The word «comprehensive» came into use to describe incomplete
databases in the strongest possible terms, creating the impression of completeness, while leaving an «out» for the
legal publisher when omissions were identified
by users.
Despite best efforts of individual
legal publishers, there are many understandable reasons for incomplete
databases: — problems with obtaining access to cases available on one service that are no longer available from the source, — copyright claims and the threat of litigation
by traditional print
publishers respecting print law report series, — the control exercised
by SOQUIJ over access to Quebec cases, and / or — the lack of the will
by the
publisher to identify and and acquire missing cases identified
by means of a
database audit.
If you were to buy an ebook which was updated
by RSS but you didn't subscribe to the
database where the
legal publisher updated the case / piece of legislation — would you miss out?