Most of my published (the printed on
dead tree publications that is) works are at the public library.
Not exact matches
Not six years have passed since the
publication of the
dead -
tree version of the book whose constituent electronic states you hold in your hand (or claw, or manipulator, delete as applicable).
While I try to view the value of my published pieces in other ways, like the
publication's circulation, the positive feedback and reviews, or even how much money I made, there is something very real and delightful about receiving one's work in a tangible,
dead -
tree format.
Given this failure on the part of the Nature Geoscience editorial staff, isn't it the duty of outsiders — almost assuredly including Langenberg himself, if he is alerted to this utterance scheduled for
dead -
tree - format
publication in June — to offer the editors of this journal some commentary on the methodologies, results, and conclusions of Tierney et al?