A great
deal of scientific knowledge and a robust strategy are required in defending these claims.
Not exact matches
The good news is that there are other kinds
of knowledge beyond
scientific knowledge... and there are long philosophical tracts
dealing with the existence
of God (both pro and con).
The first part
of the same column
deals with a topic that has recently become more prominent in the Christian interpretation
of our
scientific knowledge of the world, namely our experience
of beauty.
This is unfortunate since there is a great
deal of knowledge about sleep in children based on
scientific studies.
There is a tremendous disconnect between what most people (especially here in the US) think that the state
of the
scientific knowledge is, and what it really is — partly, I think, because it's hard to grasp just how big the field
of climate science is, partly because
of organized disinformation campaigns orchestrated by the likes
of Senator Inhofe, Exxon and Massey Energy, and informed by the tactics (and sometimes funding sources)
of the tobacco denial movement, and partly because who really * wants * to believe in a big, tough - to -
deal - with danger to the well - being
of our kids and our society?
Using the
scientific approach whilst excluding practical
knowledge in law schools, as Nadia Chiesa points out, does not prepare students for practice: «In his 1935 indictment
of legal education, Karl Llewellyn denounces the law schools
of his time as factories pulling in immature, unprepared young men and, three years later, churning out young lawyers who are not significantly better prepared to
deal with the realities
of the legal profession.»