Sentences with phrase «deal out of the profits»

The program will give you access to lenders and tell you how to do it all, but they will only give you $ 10k per deal out of the profits, so I'd rather get the whole profit.

Not exact matches

When the deal was finalized, KKR cashed out a profit of $ 5.4 billion while still retaining a substantial stake.

For one Bantu to cheat another out of a fair profit in a business deal is unethical.

If there was a massive bid from Munch and Alexis was aware of it, it is of course possible that he may refuse talks on a contract extension to force a deal through, but another possibility is that Wenger may find it hard to refuse a massive profit, which he could then splash out on bringing in some more effective strikers (like Aubemeyang!)

@Fatboy Gooner The Ozil deal was far less that 40 plus million as has been exposed on football leaks it was more in the region of 32 million with verious clauses that enable REM to take a percentage of any profit we make on selling Ozil and I would assume there are similar attachments with the Sanchez deal, even our record signings are clouded in smoke and mirrors so let not run away with the idea that its all SWengers fault, if your employer is on your back and pushing for results then you perform at a higher rate and push harder where as Wenger has no push from above so does nt go out of his way Kroenke does nt have the culture around him to win trophies cos thats not his aim and that filters down to the grass roots at Arsenal and shows in Wengers transfer policy and in the players performance.

just reading around and all if not most rags are saying our net spend is # 46 million how can they tell that when they do nt even know what our real budget is if it was # 100 million then we are in profit by quite a bit i do nt really know what they base there assumptions on this is where you could do with swiss ramble to dissect what really was spent from what i could see most of our 5 transfers were covered by out goings and c / l monies earned debuchy - vela deal, chambers - vermalen deal, ospina - cesc and miquel deals sanchez c / l monies and other monies recovered from wages and old installment based deals this is the same with welbeck i would imagine if not then poldolski will be sold in jan to cover this as i think he was going to be sold and this would have covered welbecks transfer more or less also and people do nt always realize that arsenal have money coming in from more than one source to cover transfers not just puma and emirates deals we have property arm of the club which makes money for transfers also outstanding debts we are owed of old transfers we receive each year on song cesc maybe van persie and all other structured deals in installment payments sales we just flogged miquel as an example and all the monies from released wages and youths sold its a bit to complex to just say we have a net spend of xyz when arsenal do nt even make the budget public so they have no starting point from which to go from i bet you we have broke even or even made a slight profit as we are self sustaining it would make sense that we can break even or at least make the net spend under # 10 million each year at least screw then all we are the arsenal we do thing our way

the profit after the last bet is just $ 27,000, and the client needs to p; ay Stevens $ 3000 out of his own pocket on a pay only after you win deal.

It turns out that trillions of dollars were lent to faltering banks at rates far below market value, allowing those institutions to turn a combined $ 13 billion profit on the deal.

Platinum got a hold of $ 20 million in COBA money after Seabrook, allegedly worked out a deal to get a cut of the profits, including $ 60,000 cash handed to him in a black Ferragamo bag.

«There's still a lot of money to be made, but only when the movie works,» the insider clarified, pointing out how Stone's peer Sandra Bullock was said to have made nearly $ 70 million off of Gravity alone, thanks to a back - end deal which had the actress profiting handily when the film topped $ 600 million worldwide.

Sen. Vincent Fort called the legislation a «blatant corruption of power» that «trotted out» school children as «pawns to pad the pockets of for - profit management companies and real estate deals» supported by a «Herculean» lobbying effort that, Fort told the Senate, was «drenched in money mongering.»

In 2010, Policy Matters Ohio published a report on the practices of Imagine Inc., a for profit charter school network with schools in Ohio that was acting as a profit mill for the charter school corporate network by using insider deals, including on real estate its subsidiary owned to drain as much public money out -LSB-...] Read More»

I know I'm not along, on social media there are groups of thousands who feel the same way, but it just seems like such a poorly - conceived, lazy, quick profit - driven move to wipe out so much of what made Star Wars great and if the fans don't like it, they must either suck it up and deal or not be a Star Wars fan any longer.

So given the above, and a heaven sent opportunity (via Hugh Howey) to get a better deal for the people he supposedly works for, from the people he fights with for them... Does he blog... 1) Now there is evidence that self - published authors can achieve the same or better status and sales and a far, far higher income, I will point this out to them and to the publishers (that I fight with all the time) and tell them they've had a bumper year of profits, and unless they want to lose their authors, we'd better re-negotiate a much better deal on e-books.

As GoodEReader reported last week, several groups have lashed out at the lack of an advance and the complete reversal on the typical royalty model; rather, authors were being given what the publisher called a «profit sharing» model that the organizations and many agents and authors felt was shoving too much financial risk on the authors who signed these deals.

He did say he would sign something stating if he did sell in the near future and made alot more then we thought when we make our deal, he would pay me some of the profit, but I would rather just work it out now.

But please remember that, on average, having someone else insure you will by definition cost more than «self - insuring», since they will want to take a profit out of the deal.

I can promise you that you will blow out many trading accounts if you don't learn to take profits by setting logical reward scenarios of 2, 3, or 4 times your risk, if you trail your stop you can sometimes pick up 5 times your risk or higher, it all depends on market conditions and whether or not you can deal with letting a 1 to 2 or larger winner turn around and move against you because you were hoping for a bigger reward.

This can help a trader make an optimum profit out of a trading deal and make it a stress - free activity.

The commonly used name is «stoozing», used to describe any technique to profit out of playing credit card companies» deals.

Of course, that takes time, and profits for the rating agencies comes from cramming as many deals out the door as they can.

Sure, they're not going to make a profit, but at least they're pushing the hell out of it instead of the ghost town of deals and news we've heard from Sony since the Move's release.

«The deals we discuss in «Out of Africa» have resulted in huge profits for BVI companies at the expense of the Congolese people.

«The new fixed and graduated fee schemes (for civil, family and immigration legal aid) are predicated on providers carrying out a range of cases that address the full spectrum of clients» needs... Providers may choose to use particular practitioners as specialists to deal with more complex cases, however, the organisation as a whole will need to provide a full range of services in order to profit effectively from the new fees.»

They figure they're doing a lot of it so they're getting the $ out of their work and sacrificing the profit that should be there just so they can get in cheap... might as well get a second job... Anyway, I still see the market as abundant with absolutely no problem getting my clients heavy cash flowing deals in where I believe the be the most strategic locations of Rochester.

To do a true calculation of how much your time was worth you have to back out how much of the $ 8k profit was due to the capital you were able to put into deal because that's really your return as an investor as opposed to doing the work.

You need to figure out the length of time per rehab to get back your investment plus the profit plus the amount of profit average per deal.

If the company fails to make a profit and therefore goes out of business, we will be forced to find a new firm, causing a great deal of disruption to our lives, and ultimately costing us business.

I'd say my first 20 deals (back in the early 2000s) were all less than $ 1K out - of - pocket, for profits anywhere from $ 3K to $ 50K.

As investors, we are in business to make a modest profit on any deal, however we can help homeowners out of just about any situation, no matter what!

If I'm marketing another wholesaler's deal, I usually work it out with them (the wholesaler) so that I am marketing it at the same price as they are, and they just cut me in on some of the profit.

As for payback, you could either pay them back as quickly as possible with the extra cash flow, offer them a percentage of the profit from the deal and / or a larger percentage of the monthly cash flow, or target a rapid cash out refi if the deal allows.

For example, when do you pay out the profits, are there penalties to the investors if they pull out of the fund before a certain number of years, do they roll over the profits they've made and if so, are there incentives for that other than compounding, are you paying out - or allocating - ALL of the profits to investors or yourself each year (meaning if the fund closed tomorrow would you keep the chunk of money left over after paying out the investor profits and initial investments or would you divide that chunk up between all the investors), are you paying yourself a salary for managing the fund and if so, are you also profit sharing??? I ask that last one because once I switch over to a fund like this, the money I am currently pulling out of each deal to live on, would need to stay in the fund and I'm left with no income until the end of the year if that's when the fund distributes profits.