But critics question the safety of nuclear power, citing such concerns as the potential for catastrophic meltdowns, their potential vulnerability to terrorists, the lack of workable evacuation plans in the event of accidents as well as the problem of
dealing with radioactive waste.
There is still no safe, reliable solution for
dealing with the radioactive waste produced by nuclear plants.
Not exact matches
The collapse of a tunnel containing
radioactive waste at the Hanford nuclear weapons complex in Washington State underscored what critics have long been saying: The toxic remnants of the Cold War are being stored in haphazard and unsafe conditions, and time is running out to
deal with the problem.
«I don't believe anyone has taken a look, seriously, at what the unintended consequences are to
dealing with these kinds of materials,» said Theodore Adams, the
radioactive waste disposal consultant.
He contrasted the advantages of renewables over nuclear power plants as their ease of decommissioning: there is no long - lived
radioactive waste to
deal with, and upgrading, for example, offshore wind turbines, is cost - effective because the foundations and infrastructure are already built.
«Nuclear
waste remains
radioactive for thousands of years and the nuclear industry has not come up
with a technological process to
deal with this highly toxic
waste and similarly as toxic chemical industry dump their
waste in the ground, so does the nuclear industry.