Sentences with phrase «deals with carbon capture»
«You can't get to stabilization without having to deal with carbon capture and storage from both the coal fleet [of power plants] and the natural gas fleet,» says Scott Klara, NETL's director of the office of coal and power systems research and development.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/ Not exact matches
Methane or natural gas is 72 times more potent at capturing heat in the atmosphere than carbon dioxide over the first 20 years after release - and to deal with climate change, we need to focus on the next few decades.
Dealing with the emissions of CO2, the most ubiquitous greenhouse gas, will require carbon capture and storage (CCS) for the ammonia, cement and iron industries — and that will cost.
«Since the transition away from fossil fuels is likely to take a very long time, we foresee a long - term need to deal with coal - based emissions and, therefore, the sooner we begin to develop [carbon capture and storage] technology, the better,» Austin - based energy policy specialist Scott Anderson of Environmental Defense told a Senate panel earlier this year during a hearing on CCS technology.
Moreover, Wyoming is working on dealing with the carbon dioxide issue, researching carbon capture technology.
Carbon counting deals with the science: how you measure the amount of carbon captured in forests, farms, and prairies, as well as the changes in that amount (the carbon flux).
Further to this, the Letter also deals with the application of carbon capture and storage (CCS) for mitigation and finds that;
He was really there saying, why should we divest when carbon capture and sequestration can deal with this problem.
But air - capture machines, installed anywhere on earth, could deal with the 52 percent of carbon - dioxide emissions that are caused by distributed, smaller sources like cars, farms, and homes.
TreeHugger recently did give Rudd a Best of Green award, but I wonder if Rudd hasn't made a deal with the devil here: CCS Can Be Part of the Solution... Rudd rightly gets that, in his words, «Carbon capture and storage is not the only answer to the climate change challenge» and that it can certainly play a part in the transition to a low - carbon future, but I just don't buy into Rudd's «cold, hard reality» that coal will remain (or at least has to remain) the globe's major source of energy for many years to come.