Jesus Christ's
death and resurrection make us «alive» because we are no longer followers of the prince of this world; we are no longer children of wrath.
He is trying to force us to recognize that in spite of what appears to be orthodox christological affirmations, we are embedded in social practices that deny that Jesus's life,
death and resurrection make any difference.
Not exact matches
Paul is
making the case that Jesus did in fact rise therefore our faith is firm
and the act of baptism associates you with the
death, burial
and resurrection and shows others (those living) your choice
and association with Christ.
I joked last year that 33 was «My Jesus Year» (because in most church traditions, Jesus did the whole «
Death and Resurrection Thing» in his thirty - third year
and so people try to
make their 33rd year very meaningful).
I don't disagree (if I am understanding you correctly), but we must
make sure we understand the difference between how to receive eternal life (believe in Jesus Christ alone for it),
and the logical
and theological foundations for that truth (deity of Jesus,
death and resurrection of Jesus, sinfulness of humanity, etc., etc., etc.).
The heart of the life,
death and resurrection of Jesus is
made present
and effective for us here
and now.
The
death and resurrection of Christ
made Him Lord of All.
Only God can
make it through us, through Jesus Christ's
death and resurrection.
Paul implies that it is just such experiences which have been
made possible by the cataclysmic
death and resurrection of Christ
and which will be climaxed by that final renewal, the second coming.
We can only be saved through God's Grace, which is a free gift from God which we obtain through Jesus Christ's
death and resurrection, which
makes us righteous before God.
For each year Lent
and Easter are, once again, the rediscovery
and the recovery by us of what we were
made through our own baptismal
death and resurrection.
The conception of a cosmos redeemed by the
death and resurrection of the Saviour,
and sanctified by the footsteps of God, of Jesus, the Virgin,
and the saints,
made possible...» The terror of history was the time in bondage for Romanians who were in the hands of the oppressive forces, which invaded Romania time
and again.
So we come to the
resurrection, Christ's conquest of
death and his life received into God
and therefore
made available to humankind for evermore.
«After Jesus» failure
and death, his disciples stole his body
and declared his
resurrection in order to maintain their financial security
and ensure themselves some standing» So let me get this strait, the disciples slip past the awake guards
and the chief priest that gather, remove a large stone without
making enough noise to wake those who were already awake.
Of course the true sign that is given all Christians is Christ's
death and resurrection,
and so we must say that Matthew has in a sense rightly interpreted the full meaning of Jesus» words, but in such a way as to
make it harder to get at the original sense of the passage.
In so doing, some sacrifice of completeness has been
made, but by this means the reader will be able to understand that both these writers have a single purpose: to declare the meaning
and content of the ministry,
death,
and resurrection of Jesus Christ.
I believe that the centre of our faith is this vision which was
made a concrete reality in the life,
death and resurrection of Jesus Christ.
It is to ask oneself, «What difference does the
death and resurrection of Christ
make for how I understand this part of the Old Testament?»
For Paul we escape the power of sin, not by
making laws against it but by participating in the faithfulness, the
death,
and, eventually, the
resurrection of Jesus.
It seems that the earliest preaching of the
resurrection made no attempt to describe the appearances, but rather proclaimed the fact of the
resurrection as God's reversal of the disgrace of crucifixion: «the
death of Jesus is interpreted as Israel's No to the proclamation of Jesus
and the
resurrection as God's Yes, his validation of Jesus» message.
Furthermore, the doctrinal structure of faith is much more than the «grammar of the Church's narrative»: it is the reality of communion with the Trinity through the life,
death and Resurrection of Jesus Christ, the Son of God
made Man
and the centre of all human history.
The Book of Common Prayer had this meaning in view when it employs, in the course of the Prayer of Consecration in the service of Holy Communion, the words: «Wherefore, O Lord
and heavenly Father, according to the institution of thy dearly beloved Son our Savior Jesus Christ, we, thy humble servants, do celebrate
and make here, before thy Divine Majesty, with these thy holy gifts, which we now offer unto thee, the memorial thy Son hath commanded us to
make; having in remembrance his blessed passion
and precious
death, his mighty
resurrection and glorious ascension; rendering unto thee most hearty thanks for the innumerable benefits procured unto us by the same.»
Both masses would have
made us present at the Last Supper, the
death and the
resurrection of our divine saviour.
But I do see the divine priority, God's prevenient guidance, in the event as a whole — the history of Old Testament Israel, the birth, ministry,
death and resurrection of Jesus,
and the coming into being of his church —
and in its effect, which we variously describe as the supreme revelation of God's love, the redemption of the world, the coming into being of the church.15 Indeed it is precisely God's prevenient guidance that
makes of this entire historical sequence, including its climax in Jesus, one single event, producing one single effect.
What does it mean, practically, to preserve
and celebrate (as much as we can) the original intent of the authors of the Old Testament while still asking ourselves, «what difference does the
death and resurrection of Christ
make for how I understand this part of the Old Testament»?
Once we recognize this
and believe that Jesus
made the way thru His
death and resurrection, then our relationship with God is restored.
But religion is a man -
made system that tends to go against the flow of what the Lord Jesus brought to life through His
death and resurrection.
What
makes me as well as God angry about, is so - called Christian people, that act like Jesus
death burial
and resurrection meant NOTHING!
Thus the authentic line of development, as the expectation of an immediate advent faded, led to a concentration of attention upon the historical facts of the ministry,
death,
and resurrection of Jesus, exhibited in an eschatological setting which
made clear their absolute
and final quality as saving facts.
These sorts of adjustments to water baptism would
make the
death, burial,
and resurrection symbolism much more clear for the average viewer.
In Pastor Benke's actual prayer (as opposed to the written text from which he departed), he
made no mention of Jesus (except in the closing phrase), nor of the significance of Christ's life,
death,
and resurrection as the unique expression of God's love, nor of the need for repentance
and faith in Christ as means of grace.
Moreover, whereas Judaism spoke of its covenant with God as established through Abraham
and Moses, the Church spoke of its covenant
made in the life -
death resurrection of Jesus.
Especially the theme of God's word
and promise, but also those of exodus, redemption, covenant, justice, wisdom, of the Logos
made flesh, of the Spirit poured out on the face of creation, of the compassion, paternity
and maternity of God,
and especially the Trinitarian character of God — all of the indispensable elements in a Christian theology — communicate their depth only when they are united with the theme of divine self - abnegation which, at least to Christian faith, comes to its most explicit expression in the life,
death,
and resurrection of Jesus?
And this Environment is mediated to us through the Person of Jesus Christ, God made man, the Word become flesh — in His living and knowing as revealed to us in His birth, life, death and resurrecti
And this Environment is mediated to us through the Person of Jesus Christ, God
made man, the Word become flesh — in His living
and knowing as revealed to us in His birth, life, death and resurrecti
and knowing as revealed to us in His birth, life,
death and resurrecti
and resurrection.
As we have noted, the exact meaning of these words has been a matter of dispute, but worshippers believe that in
making a memorial of what Jesus said
and did, they share in his
death and resurrection.
Before
making progress on that front, let us consider more closely how we understand the central Christian claim that God revealed himself in the life,
death and resurrection of Jesus Christ.
Here there is entrance into the «benefits» — the results
made available for the lives of men — which Christ's life,
death,
and resurrection effected
and which gave rise to the specifically Christian claim that he is God's Son, that One in whom True God dwells supremely in a true man, for the wholeness of all men.
Wherefore, O Lord
and heavenly Father, according to the institution of thy dearly beloved Son, our Savior Jesus Christ, we thy humble servants do celebrate
and make here before thy divine majesty, with these thy holy gifts which we now offer unto thee, the memorial thy Son hath commanded us to
make, having in remembrance his blessed Passion
and precious
Death, his mighty
Resurrection and glorious Ascension, rendering unto thee most hearty thanks for the innumerable benefits procured unto us by the same.
Now what I mean is this: in the three verses listed above, the apostle Paul
makes it clear that the Corinthian Christians he is addressing HAD «received»
and «believed» his gospel message of Christ's
death and resurrection (cf. 1 Cor.
To put it still another way, overstating the case but perhaps
making it somewhat clearer: Jesus» gospel was the gospel of the Kingdom; the apostolic gospel was the gospel of the
death and resurrection of Jesus the Messiah;
and yet the latter was believed to be the continuation
and proclamation of the former.
In the end,
Resurrection and the Restoration of Israel reveals a vision that
makes death a parenthesis between moments of life,
and makes the body a site not only of
death but also of redemption.
In the first case, this reminds us that baptism
makes us part of Christ, members of his body the Church,
and sharers in his
death and resurrection.
«The rekindling of the paschal candle reminds us that baptism
makes us part of Christ, members of his body the Church, sharers in his
death and resurrection»
but I am aware of OT Scriptures prophesying how Christ's
death and resurrection would
make the payment for our sins so we could be reconciled to God (e.g. Isaiah 53).
But the study of initiation symbolism seeks another end: to decipher the implicit symbolism in such
and such a rite or initiation myth (regressus ad uterum, ritual
death and resurrection, etc.), to study each one of these symbols morphologically
and historically,
and to elucidate the existential situation which has
made the formation of these symbols possible.
They must find
and destroy all that remain of these seven items before the Dark Lord gets his hands on the three Deathly Hallows (the Elder Wand, the Invisibility Cloak
and the
Resurrection Stone), which will
make him the master of
death,
and therefore impossible to destroy.
Other new shows premiering include: procedural Killer Women (Thursday, Jan. 7), about one of the first women to become a Texas Ranger; Christian Slater vehicle, Mind Games (Tuesday, March 11), about a team that uses unorthodox methods to help people
make their dreams come true; half - hour comedy Mixology (Wednesday, February 26) about ten people at various points in their lives congregating in the same bar over the same evening;
and Resurrection (Sunday, March 9), a one - hour drama series about life in Arcadia, Missouri when the townspeople deceased loved ones begin to return to them — unchanged from the moments of their
deaths.
A sphere
made of colored strips of fabric torn from a plethora of unraveled paintings, The Painting Ball performs the undoing of painting in its traditional form to mark a tabula rasa moment that inscribes Saban's project firmly into the canonical narrative of painting's many
deaths and resurrections.