Sentences with phrase «death claim as»

Suppose if, unfortunate death of policy holder happens in year 2027 (at age 40), then by that time total premium paid will be Rs. 6,52,620 and nominee will get death claim as Rs. 19,20,000 in case of normal death or Rs. 31,20,000 as accidental death claim in case of death due to accident and policy will stop.

There are few term plans which offer the flexibility to the nominees to take the death claim as lump sum at a discounted rate even if in the plan benefit is opted as staggered payout.

But, if you need life insurance guaranteed to last for your entire lifetime, no matter how old you live to, permanent life insurance can help, but costs a lot more, because it's guaranteed to pay out a death claim as long as you pay your premiums on time.

This is why you won't be notified because once you switch to permanent coverage, they will be responsible for a future death claim as long as you continue to pay your life insurance premiums.

Please Note: Kindly read the «Exclusions» as mentioned in the policy wordings / document before filing a death claim as it will help you to file a death claim under a term plan without any difficulty.

It's important to file a death claim as soon as the insured is pronounced dead in order to avoid complications in the review process.

However, unlike other contracts wherein fulfilling certain obligations from both sides will generally be simultaneous, in life insurance contracts, the customer fulfils his obligations of payment of premium either immediately (single premium) or periodically (annually) with a hope and belief that the other party (insurer) will be fulfilling his part of the obligation in due course through multiple events like partial withdrawals, loans, survival or maturity benefits, surrenders or any live or death claim as per contractual obligations.

Whereas with whole life, the insurer will one day pay a death claim as long as you keep the policy in force.

Although you are going through terrific emotional turmoil and sadness due to the wrongful death of someone you loved, filling a wrongful death claim as quickly as possible is crucial.

His very insecurity drives him to the necessity of overestimating his capacity for attaining perfection, since this must be accomplished before death claims him as its victim.

The death benefit coverage in force at December 31, 2011 (representing the amount payable if all of approximately 480,000 contractholders had submitted death claims as of that date) was approximately $ 5.4 billion.

The personal injury attorneys who work for Ketchmark and McCreight, P.C. have years of experience in filing wrongful death claims as well as personal injury claims in Kansas and Missouri.

The Kansas injury accident attorneys at Ketchmark and McCreight, P.C., located in Kansas City, are fully qualified and able to handle not only personal injury claims but wrongful death claims as well.

You might also want to ask if they are able to handle wrongful death claims as well and what their Kansas City motor accident attorneys» experience is like in that area too.

If you've been injured, or if a loved one has been injured or killed, in a truck accident that was caused by someone else, it's imperative you contact an attorney experienced in truck accident law, personal injury law, and wrongful death claims as soon as possible after the crash.

Not exact matches

The data results of a Social Security number verification can contain the state of and approximate year of the number; status as an invalid, nonissued, or misused number; status on whether the number has been used to file a death claim; address (es) of the user; employer (s) of the user; the year of birth or age of the user.

Fortune pointed to the quarterly report Tesla had filed just three days after the crash, warning that»... we face inherent risk of exposure to claims in the event our vehicles do not perform as expected resulting in personal injury or death,» and specifically calling out Autopilot as a technology that could result in such claims and materially affect financial performance.

The $ 299 device measures brain electrical activity via 16 scalp sensors, which the company claims allow recognition of basic emotions and up to 30 specific thoughts, such as «lift this object,» «fire death ray,» or «fly forward.»

In the case that you pass, the policy beneficiaries should file a claim with the insurer, after which point the circumstances of your death will be reviewed and receive the payout (also called a death benefit or the face value of the policy) so long as everything is in order.

Upon your death, the beneficiaries file claims and are paid directly by the insurer, as the money isn't considered a part of your estate.

Religions incorporated and codified these basic social values and skills, and quickly learned to take credit for them — as if, without the religion, we would be doomed to not have them — although we see them in every human society, including hunter - gather tribes with no sense of gods as we understand them After many centuries of religious domination, enforced through pain of death, ostracization or other social sanctions, allowing religion to take credit, as well as failing to question other religious claims — has become a cultural habit.

As Christ claimed the victory over death by death, so a Christian defeats death and the fear of death with all of its tragic consequences through a mindfulness of death during his life.

It is so incomprehensible to understand how a company (Fortune Hi - Tech Marketing) that claims its mere existence is to help as many as possible, with help of the church, can also be so obnoxiously arrogant to believe they can manipulate the justice system to a point where they can push someone to death.

Reading the account of how this professor expressed himself about the author's experience with the dying begs the question in my mind, - How many religious scholars and clergymen are as truly enlightened about life, death and the nature of things as they self - satisfyingly claim to be doctored in religion?

Muchembled explains both the development of dueling among the nobility and rural revolts against the centralization of authority as reactions against state repression of traditional codes of violence: «In each case, the participants claimed an eminent right to a straight fight, even if it resulted in the death of the adversary.»

@KatMat: your analogy would begin approaching realism if: — during the pledge of allegiance kids were forced to say «one nation under The Orioles» — our nation's currency said «In Dallas Cowboys We Trust» — if millions were slaughtered, tortured and burned to death because they weren't fans of The Pittsburgh Penguins — if NASCAR fans endlessly attempted to have Intelligent Car Driving taught beside Evolution in science class as a possible explanation for how mankind developed — if «the 5 D's» of Dodgeball (Dodge, Duck, Dip, Dive, Dodge) were constantly attempted to be made into law so everyone would live by the same ridiculous notions, even if those notions knowingly discriminate — if nutters constantly claimed America was founded on the principles of Darts, even though our country SPECIFICALLY calls for a separation between Darts and State because the founders knew the inherent dangers of Darts becoming government instead of staying in the realm of sport where it belongs

Among them are the rights to: bullet joint parenting; bullet joint adoption; bullet joint foster care, custody, and visitation (including non-biological parents); bullet status as next - of - kin for hospital visits and medical decisions where one partner is too ill to be competent; bullet joint insurance policies for home, auto and health; bullet dissolution and divorce protections such as community property and child support; bullet immigration and residency for partners from other countries; bullet inheritance automatically in the absence of a will; bullet joint leases with automatic renewal rights in the event one partner dies or leaves the house or apartment; bullet inheritance of jointly - owned real and personal property through the right of survivorship (which avoids the time and expense and taxes in probate); bullet benefits such as annuities, pension plans, Social Security, and Medicare; bullet spousal exemptions to property tax increases upon the death of one partner who is a co-owner of the home; bullet veterans» discounts on medical care, education, and home loans; joint filing of tax returns; bullet joint filing of customs claims when traveling; bullet wrongful death benefits for a surviving partner and children; bullet bereavement or sick leave to care for a partner or child; bullet decision - making power with respect to whether a deceased partner will be cremated or not and where to bury him or her; bullet crime victims» recovery benefits; bullet loss of consortium tort benefits; bullet domestic violence protection orders; bullet judicial protections and evidentiary immunity; bullet and more...

In this way, Altizer seeks to claim as an epiphany of Christ even the hell and death to which the modern spirit is drawn in fascinated horror.

The central element of the resurrection — Jesus of Nazareth's triumph over death — does not qualify as Christian Myth for the simple reason that we claim it is true.

Sean Rigg who died in custody in 2008, as Andrew Birks, one of five officers that have been investigated over the death of Rigg has claimed that his prolonged suspension is unlawful.

Ok snide hat off: I agree that if anyone thinks they have all the answers they need to crack open many many many many more books, nor have I seen christians claim they know all the answers just as much as atheist do, however it is crazy that christians, and other relgious folks, seem to know what happens after death, how is it you got those answers?

They live, he claims, as nice or unobsessed emotional solitaries, unmoved by love and death, but only by music that imitates the mechanical rutting of animals.

Belief in it has caused nearly as much destruction, death and persecution as christianity has, with NO validity to its claims.

It may seem somewhat trite to invoke the freedom of creation as part of the works and ends of divine love, or to argue that the highest good of the creature — divinizing union with God in love — requires a realm of «secondary causality» in which the rational wills of God's creatures are at liberty; nonetheless, whether the traditional explanations of how sin and death have been set loose in the world satisfy one or not, they certainly render the claim that an omnipotent and good God would never allow unjust suffering simply vacuous.

Death himself, death so immense, is to be dreaded — and reversing the words makes them more portentous — but death is not so immense; to his claims of power, we can reply that it is not so; and we can make a comparison and say that death is not so powerful as a little innocDeath himself, death so immense, is to be dreaded — and reversing the words makes them more portentous — but death is not so immense; to his claims of power, we can reply that it is not so; and we can make a comparison and say that death is not so powerful as a little innocdeath so immense, is to be dreaded — and reversing the words makes them more portentous — but death is not so immense; to his claims of power, we can reply that it is not so; and we can make a comparison and say that death is not so powerful as a little innocdeath is not so immense; to his claims of power, we can reply that it is not so; and we can make a comparison and say that death is not so powerful as a little innocdeath is not so powerful as a little innocence.

As for the reason Jesus was put to death, Cox locates the proximate cause not in humanity's sinfulness; nor in Jewish outrage over Jesus» claims to be the Son of God and the Way, the Truth, and the Life; nor in the jealousy of religious leaders threatened by Jesus» miracles (which Cox suggests were the fruit of positive thinking on the part of those who «feel» healed after touching Jesus); nor in his teachings (which Cox insists were uncontroversial among the Jews).

You don't want to claim that you are atheist, and at the same time admit that you claim it because of the grace of God, that allows you to claim it, as is noted by the dates of your birth and death.

as for proving Jesus is alive, no worries, He will be back in the flesh as soon as all the prophecies of these days of distress are fulfilled, so stay alive until He arrives... however, should Death claim you before hand, you will know the truth anyway... and every aethist comes to know if God exists by the time of their funeral... unfortunately, they can't tell their friends the truth they have found then.So God is patient, for He knows the days of a man are short.

Death's brutality over the greater part of the last two millennia cast a long shadow over everyday life as disease, famine, and infant mortality claimed victim after victim.

There he is free to make explicit the Christian claim that Isaiah 53 was a text, «as authoritative scripture, that exercised pressure on the early church in its struggle to understand the suffering and death of Jesus Christ.»

By interpreting his death as both the revelation and empowerment of new life in God's Spirit, Christians claim that God's promises are fulfilled and our destiny made possible.

Wilson describes the claim that his father's death does not come into the story as a «preposterous assertion,» and he may be right.

To his criterion for discerning satanic «Christianity» we might add these: hostility toward those who are different; projecting evil on other who are then demonized; claiming doctrinal certitude; breeding psychic dependency, unconsciousness, stagnation, fear, guilt, or hatred; depicting God as a monster (as in ascribing the death of loved ones to God).

My humble advise to you is to go and study the history that how, when and who wrote these chapters and what type of time it went through and then say that if there is any statement in this book is the real time statements of Jesus PBUH... please be honest with yourself... and don't do anything to please others but only you... and make sure you are convince with this study... whats the difference btwn what is in this book and what was written in a book last year when a Hindu claim himself as God and millions believed in him and still they believe even after his death by being ill... no one asks if I take a human as my God then how could he be ill or eventually be dead?

... i am discussing the god you claim to worship... even if you believe jesus was god on earth it doesn't matter for if you take what he had to say as law then you should take with equal fervor words and commands given from god itself... it stands as logical to do this and i am confused since most only do what jesus said... the dude was only here for 30 years and god has been here for the whole time — he has added, taken away, and revised everything he has set previous to jesus and after his death... thru the prophets — i base my argument on the book itself.

I love where he says «To his criterion for discerning satanic «Christianity» we might add these: hostility toward those who are different; projecting evil on other who are then demonized; claiming doctrinal certitude;... depicting God as a monster (as in ascribing the death of loved ones to God).»

Or again, one might adopt an analogy from the law courts, and explain the death of Christ as a transaction between God and man through which God's claims on man were satisfied.

«If;» as Paul says, «one died on behalf of all and consequently all died,» that death must be claimed as the end of my involvement in the old moral order.

but thats not what i'm talking about... i am discussing the god you claim to worship... even if you believe jesus was god on earth it doesn't matter for if you take what he had to say as law then you should take with equal fervor words and commands given from god itself... it stands as logical to do this and i am confused since most only do what jesus said... the dude was only here for 30 years and god has been here for the whole time — he has added, taken away, and revised everything he has set previous to jesus and after his death... thru the prophets — i base my argument on the book itself, so if you have a counter argument i believe you haven't a full understanding of the book — and that would be my overall point... belief without full understanding of or consideration to real life or consequences for the hereafter is equal to a childs belief in santa which is why we atheists feel it is an equal comparision... and santa is clearly a bs story... based on real events from a real historical person but not a magical being by any means!

For example, to condemn lethal organ harvesting, or pre-viability removal of an unborn child from its mother, it is not necessary to claim that the surgeon «must» have intended the foreseen death for the unborn child or the organ donor — as a result of what he did intend for the object of his assault.