Sentences with phrase «death cross did»

Of course, a golden cross or a death cross do not suggest that you should mechanically buy or sell.

Not exact matches

It doesn't matter if you're crossing a hazardous body of water or putting your brand on display for public judgment; either one can feel like life or death.

MCD did experience a death cross at the beginning of April, but with today's earnings report, has now surpassed all three of its core moving averages (50, 100, and 200), as well as its three - month - long trading range between $ 160 and $ 140.

We all fall short and deserve death, but because of what Jesus did on the cross 2,000 years ago, we are able to have life.

That said, there are eye witnesses that went to their deaths saying that they saw Jesus die on a cross, and saw him again days later alive, then later still saw him raise up into heaven, all the while proclaiming he is the Son of God sent to do that for others sins so they could be saved.

And it is a model that, rather than reinforcing hierarchal relationships, should point us in the opposite direction — to the radical humility and servanthood of Jesus, who did not see power as something to grasp, but humbled himself and became submissive to the point of death on a cross.

In doing this he redeems us from the disaster of sin and death by offering his life on the cross.

Jesus went to the cross out of love, to rescue us from sin, death, and devil, but since the Gospels (or the rest of the New Testament for that matter) don't place much emphasis on the blood of Jesus or the pain He went through on the cross, maybe we shouldn't either.

This hermeneutic of love is not mere sentimentality, but one that looks to Christ for its definition — Christ, who did not consider power a thing to be grasped, but humbled himself and became a servant to the point of death on a cross.

He doesn't seem to remember that at the cross Jesus made it clear that he, too, deserves death for the things he has done.

If a person must believe in the death and resurrection of Jesus, do they have to believe that it was by the shedding of blood of Jesus on the cross that sins are forgiven, or can they just believe that it was simply His death that was sufficient?

If they believe that Jesus Christ died on the cross for the sins of all mankind, and if they believe that three days after his death, Jesus Christ rose from the dead and if they believe all of these things, but don't believe in Jesus for eternal life, that person is not saved.

In all that Jesus said and did, in his death on the cross and in the living presence of Christ, a promise of victory over sin through the forgiving love of God is brought to us.

Following him with our cross is an attitude of life, not a manner of death, because he says it is something we do «daily» (Luke 9:23).

We are standing under the cross, being ourselves delivered to death, imprisoned in guilt, disappointed, deficient in love, selfish and cowardly, suffering through ourselves, through others, through life it - self, which we do not understand.

SEAN do you know death came into the world because of one mans sin (ADAM) SEAN thats why JESUS had to come to earth in human form and die on the cross for our sin so that we could be reconciled back to GOD.

But what do we mean when we speak of the cross, the passion, of death in relation to Jesus?

Second, while God is just and holy, and while the death of Jesus did satisfy the holiness of God in regard to our sin, this was not the only — or even the primary — reason for the death of Jesus on the cross.

I may agree with you there to some degree, but I do think 1 Cor 15 makes a definite distinction), as the means of Justification salvation (I would quantify belief here, as the agreement of the fact of Jesus death for ones own personal sins (Understanding one is a sinner and needs a savior) on the cross, That he was buried, and was raised to life on the third day).

Neville i agree with you Jesus has the power to forgive sin past present and future through the cross when he died his death covered past present and future.If those in the old testament were justified by faith and made righteous then they are covered by the blood of Jesus even though he hadn't died for them yet because there hope was in God.Isn't that what the definition of faith is it is the substance of things hoped for the evidence of things unseen.The proof is Enoch how could he go to be with God if he was not righteous and only the blood of Jesus is able to do that.

Here, in contrast to the Iliad, the will of the father will be accomplished («Nevertheless, not my will, but yours, be done»)-- but that will is for the son's death on the cross.

To explain how, he turned to the second chapter of Paul's Letter to the Philippians where the apostle speaks of the self - emptying or kenosis of God: «Christ Jesus, who, though he was in the form of God, did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped, but emptied himself, taking the form of a servant... [and] humbled himself and became obedient unto death, even death on a cross.»

Only Jesus» death on the cross did.

Only because of what Jesus Christ did for me by paying the penalty for my sins, by his death on the cross.

How do you think its fair to put a cross at the death site of thousands of people, some of whom are non-believers, some of whom were Muslim, Jewish, etc.?

It is not something we do, but what Jesus does in us through His death on the cross and His resurrection from the tomb, triumphant over death.

Indeed, this is the very example of Christ, reflected in another poem, who humbled himself to the point of death, even death on a cross — and Christ clearly did not relinquish his identity in order to display humility.

This is the hour of the cross, when Jesus» generosity in freely accepting all that sin and death could do to humanity turns a gruesome execution into the triumphal procession of the Lamb.

In what way does the death of Jesus on the cross answer man's cry to be delivered from meaninglessness and despair?

Forget for a moment that you live 2000 years after the death of Jesus Christ on the cross, and forget that you have the New Testament which tells you about who Jesus was and what He did.

did not regard equality with God as something to be exploited, but emptied himself, taking the form of a slave (doulos), being born in human likeness And being found in human form, he humbled himself and became obedient to the point of death even death on a cross.

Baring your cross is supposed to bring good not death so I don't see it applying.

I don't fear death... so apparently you did at one time and need the cross to not fear it.

He «did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped,» but took on the biting chains of slavery, «and became obedient unto death, even death on a cross.

On the contrary, the cross before our Lord's death symbolized FEAR, now it is the symbol that we do not fear carrying the cross and that we do not fear death.

We agree that the work Jesus did on the cross is the only work in all of heaven and earth that will save us from the death we deserve.

This is what Jesus did on the cross, and what He revealed to us through His death and resurrection, and is how He now calls us to live our lives as His followers.

«In your relationships with one another,» he explains, «have the same attitude of mind Christ Jesus had: Who being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped, but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant he humbled himself and became obedient to death — even death on a cross!»

As a side note, I didn't explain the three story types very well, but based on my understanding, I don't put the death on the cross under redemptive violence, unless it is God using violence against Jesus, which isn't quite what happened on the cross...

-- Isn't the Son of God, — He wasn't born of a virgin — He wasn't / Isn't perfect — He wasn't God and man in one person — He didn't die a sin atoning death on the cross — He didn't rise from the dead and ascend

They also concluded that Jesus» death on the cross was an act of atonement, not for any wrongs that he had done, but for the sins of other men — all men of all ages.

The «politics of Jesus,» to use Yoder's phrase, demands that through the collective witness of the Church Christians bring the gospel to the attention of the world with a compelling and revolutionary challenge to the powers of the age, as Jesus did by rejecting temporal power and accepting death on the cross.

Wasp you are right in away It did all come from the point of a spear, stuck into a man on a cross to ensure his death, this scenario set up a scene where within 3 days many folks were talking about this same dude raising from the dead healed of all wounds.

however, to be clear: the cross tells me my sins are as bad as anyone else's (they deserve death)-- and yet he was willing to do that for me (demonstrating what LOVE really is: Jn.15: 13).

where the struggle is in regards to Jesus» will and Gods will being done is I believe, In Jesus flesh struggling to keep up with the Spirit if you know what I mean... Jesus never asked to be saved John 12:27 but He prayed for strength as His soul was sorrowful even unto death... Obviously due to the separation He would «feel» on the cross (I've read your article on The Father never forsaking Jesus on the cross-Psalms 22:24 and 2 Cor 5:19 but just felt the separation as a man) So that's what I'm leaning towards in this whole interpretation...

(but even if it didn't that should be obvious) Therefore Gods groundwork for the spectacular future that God has in store for us is built upon love and the way to create that love is for God to forgive us and grant us eternal life which is made available to us by the grace of Jesus Christ and the death he took for us all on the cross.

The cross of sacrificial love usually does not and can not mean the cross of physical death.

Francis challenged the church of his day — not by conforming to the standards of the world but by returning to the pattern of Jesus, the one who did not seek status but humbled himself and became obedient unto death, even death on the cross (Phil.

Jeremy — «Jesus went to the cross out of love, to rescue us from sin, death, and devil, but since the Gospels (OR THE REST OF THE NEW TESATMENT FOR THAT MATTER) don't place much emphasis on the blood of Jesus or the pain He went through on the cross, maybe we shouldn't either» (emphasis mine)

i do believe that the death of Jesus was a big deal though and through his death God the Father was satisfied with the sacrifice and our salvation is complete thank you Jesus for going to the cross and shedding your blood for my sins