Only Jesus»
death on the cross did.
Not exact matches
It doesn't matter if you're
crossing a hazardous body of water or putting your brand
on display for public judgment; either one can feel like life or
death.
We all fall short and deserve
death, but because of what Jesus
did on the
cross 2,000 years ago, we are able to have life.
That said, there are eye witnesses that went to their
deaths saying that they saw Jesus die
on a
cross, and saw him again days later alive, then later still saw him raise up into heaven, all the while proclaiming he is the Son of God sent to
do that for others sins so they could be saved.
And it is a model that, rather than reinforcing hierarchal relationships, should point us in the opposite direction — to the radical humility and servanthood of Jesus, who
did not see power as something to grasp, but humbled himself and became submissive to the point of
death on a
cross.
In
doing this he redeems us from the disaster of sin and
death by offering his life
on the
cross.
Jesus went to the
cross out of love, to rescue us from sin,
death, and devil, but since the Gospels (or the rest of the New Testament for that matter) don't place much emphasis
on the blood of Jesus or the pain He went through
on the
cross, maybe we shouldn't either.
This hermeneutic of love is not mere sentimentality, but one that looks to Christ for its definition — Christ, who
did not consider power a thing to be grasped, but humbled himself and became a servant to the point of
death on a
cross.
If a person must believe in the
death and resurrection of Jesus,
do they have to believe that it was by the shedding of blood of Jesus
on the
cross that sins are forgiven, or can they just believe that it was simply His
death that was sufficient?
If they believe that Jesus Christ died
on the
cross for the sins of all mankind, and if they believe that three days after his
death, Jesus Christ rose from the dead and if they believe all of these things, but don't believe in Jesus for eternal life, that person is not saved.
In all that Jesus said and
did, in his
death on the
cross and in the living presence of Christ, a promise of victory over sin through the forgiving love of God is brought to us.
SEAN
do you know
death came into the world because of one mans sin (ADAM) SEAN thats why JESUS had to come to earth in human form and die
on the
cross for our sin so that we could be reconciled back to GOD.
Second, while God is just and holy, and while the
death of Jesus
did satisfy the holiness of God in regard to our sin, this was not the only — or even the primary — reason for the
death of Jesus
on the
cross.
I may agree with you there to some degree, but I
do think 1 Cor 15 makes a definite distinction), as the means of Justification salvation (I would quantify belief here, as the agreement of the fact of Jesus
death for ones own personal sins (Understanding one is a sinner and needs a savior)
on the
cross, That he was buried, and was raised to life
on the third day).
Here, in contrast to the Iliad, the will of the father will be accomplished («Nevertheless, not my will, but yours, be
done»)-- but that will is for the son's
death on the
cross.
To explain how, he turned to the second chapter of Paul's Letter to the Philippians where the apostle speaks of the self - emptying or kenosis of God: «Christ Jesus, who, though he was in the form of God,
did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped, but emptied himself, taking the form of a servant... [and] humbled himself and became obedient unto
death, even
death on a
cross.»
Only because of what Jesus Christ
did for me by paying the penalty for my sins, by his
death on the
cross.
It is not something we
do, but what Jesus
does in us through His
death on the
cross and His resurrection from the tomb, triumphant over
death.
Indeed, this is the very example of Christ, reflected in another poem, who humbled himself to the point of
death, even
death on a
cross — and Christ clearly
did not relinquish his identity in order to display humility.
In what way
does the
death of Jesus
on the
cross answer man's cry to be delivered from meaninglessness and despair?
Forget for a moment that you live 2000 years after the
death of Jesus Christ
on the
cross, and forget that you have the New Testament which tells you about who Jesus was and what He
did.
did not regard equality with God as something to be exploited, but emptied himself, taking the form of a slave (doulos), being born in human likeness And being found in human form, he humbled himself and became obedient to the point of
death even
death on a
cross.
He «
did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped,» but took
on the biting chains of slavery, «and became obedient unto
death, even
death on a
cross.
On the contrary, the
cross before our Lord's
death symbolized FEAR, now it is the symbol that we
do not fear carrying the
cross and that we
do not fear
death.
We agree that the work Jesus
did on the
cross is the only work in all of heaven and earth that will save us from the
death we deserve.
This is what Jesus
did on the
cross, and what He revealed to us through His
death and resurrection, and is how He now calls us to live our lives as His followers.
«In your relationships with one another,» he explains, «have the same attitude of mind Christ Jesus had: Who being in very nature God,
did not consider equality with God something to be grasped, but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant he humbled himself and became obedient to
death — even
death on a
cross!»
As a side note, I didn't explain the three story types very well, but based
on my understanding, I don't put the
death on the
cross under redemptive violence, unless it is God using violence against Jesus, which isn't quite what happened
on the
cross...
-- Isn't the Son of God, — He wasn't born of a virgin — He wasn't / Isn't perfect — He wasn't God and man in one person — He didn't die a sin atoning
death on the
cross — He didn't rise from the dead and ascend
They also concluded that Jesus»
death on the
cross was an act of atonement, not for any wrongs that he had
done, but for the sins of other men — all men of all ages.
The «politics of Jesus,» to use Yoder's phrase, demands that through the collective witness of the Church Christians bring the gospel to the attention of the world with a compelling and revolutionary challenge to the powers of the age, as Jesus
did by rejecting temporal power and accepting
death on the
cross.
Wasp you are right in away It
did all come from the point of a spear, stuck into a man
on a
cross to ensure his
death, this scenario set up a scene where within 3 days many folks were talking about this same dude raising from the dead healed of all wounds.
where the struggle is in regards to Jesus» will and Gods will being
done is I believe, In Jesus flesh struggling to keep up with the Spirit if you know what I mean... Jesus never asked to be saved John 12:27 but He prayed for strength as His soul was sorrowful even unto
death... Obviously due to the separation He would «feel»
on the
cross (I've read your article
on The Father never forsaking Jesus
on the
cross-Psalms 22:24 and 2 Cor 5:19 but just felt the separation as a man) So that's what I'm leaning towards in this whole interpretation...
(but even if it didn't that should be obvious) Therefore Gods groundwork for the spectacular future that God has in store for us is built upon love and the way to create that love is for God to forgive us and grant us eternal life which is made available to us by the grace of Jesus Christ and the
death he took for us all
on the
cross.
Francis challenged the church of his day — not by conforming to the standards of the world but by returning to the pattern of Jesus, the one who
did not seek status but humbled himself and became obedient unto
death, even
death on the
cross (Phil.
Jeremy — «Jesus went to the
cross out of love, to rescue us from sin,
death, and devil, but since the Gospels (OR THE REST OF THE NEW TESATMENT FOR THAT MATTER) don't place much emphasis
on the blood of Jesus or the pain He went through
on the
cross, maybe we shouldn't either» (emphasis mine)
But if this true,
does not the
cross become less than the
cross, less than what it was to Jesus who died a painful
death on it?
The Gospel is the good news that God has sent his son Jesus Christ into the world in order to reconcile Creator to creation, which will renew all things and he has
done all this through Jesus» perfect sinless life, bloody atoning
death on the
cross and subsequent resurrection from the dead.
The assent to the deity of Christ, the
death on the
cross, and the resurrection
does not necessarily lead faith in Christ alone through His promise, whereby He is the Guarantor of eternal life to the believer in Him for it.
Evidently this
does not mean that He was preserved from the agony of the passion and the
death on the
cross.
The early Christians were learning what Christians today believe, that God was in the process of revealing his message to them; and, the message is: the end will come soon enough; we will be judged for everything we have
done while in the body; that only God through Christ's
death on the
cross can atone for our sins; and, we should remain vigilant and be prepared for the end — whether that comes in the form of natural
death, through cancer, car accidents, coronary heart disease or some other form.
What makes Christ's action
on Calvary a sacrifice for St Thomas are the things
done to him: the cruel abuse of his body leading to his
death on the
cross.
Did Jesus really need to get tortured to a bloody
death on the
cross?
A man is standing before Jesus Christ who
did not understand Christ's
death on the
cross for sins or His resurrection.
My Lord What shall I sing Him for now A song full of praise From a mouth full of doubt I lift up my face And I sing out loud With all my mistakes I still make Him proud He paid it all for me Carried that
cross for you
On that rugged walk, He knew What He had to
do Opened His arms up wide Invited the world inside One final breath He conquered
death For me and for you.
Being a Christian means that you know what Jesus Christ
did on the
cross and, you are trusting Him to forgive you, and trusting in His
death, burial, and resurrection to be enough to cleanse you of your sin.
«The Chronicles of a Hip Hop Legend: Paths of Grand Wizardry» recently
crossed the transom, as
did a technical monograph
on the
death of Napoleon, complete with charts
on possible arsenic poisoning; an illustrated religious guide, «Hell: For Those Dying to Get There»; and «Disney Your Way,» with suggested itineraries for navigating Walt Disney World.
There are precedents for «Austin» — for instance, Donald Judd's sprawling Chinati Foundation complex, which he worked
on from 1979 until his
death in 1994 to showcase his large - scale artworks and those of his contemporaries in the desert of Marfa, Tex.; Barnett Newman's 14 - part abstract painting cycle from 1958 to 1966 interpreting the stations of the
cross; the Chapelle
du Rosaire de Vence
on the French Riviera, completed in 1951, which was designed by Henri Matisse and displays his work; and Le Corbusier's 1954 Notre - Dame
du Haut, a Roman Catholic chapel in eastern France.
The Times can
do an A1 series
on train
crossing deaths but can't muster the courage to tackle the biggest crisis in human history?