Not exact matches
Though crucifixion
on this
cross only
means physical
death, not spiritual.The ankh was a symbol, not of
death, but of life, and it is the ankh that was used by all Christians until the 4th century when the Vatican introduced the Roman
cross for the first time.
It is acquiescence to the impenetrable mystery of God, an acquiescence to whatever of God the
death of Jesus
on the
cross is
meant to reveal.
I may agree with you there to some degree, but I do think 1 Cor 15 makes a definite distinction), as the
means of Justification salvation (I would quantify belief here, as the agreement of the fact of Jesus
death for ones own personal sins (Understanding one is a sinner and needs a savior)
on the
cross, That he was buried, and was raised to life
on the third day).
His
death on the
cross has often been gravely transvestied by well -
meaning Christians when they imagined that he faced the
cross with the secret knowledge that less than thirty - six hours later he would be alive again and ready to ascend into heaven.
Because the
death of Jesus
on the
cross was the very fact that sparked off the development which led to the Easter message, it came to determine the more precise
meaning of the exaltation of Jesus in a way that had no parallel in the tradition of Elijah, for he was thought never to have died.
The context clearly shows that the word «save»
means deliverance from
death on the
cross.
And no miracle
means more than the atoning
death of Jesus
on the
cross — and his resurrection from the dead, by which he proved his identity as the unique Son of God.
So Jesus was baptized of John and signified thereby his fulfillment of the old dispensation and inauguration of the new, though it
meant for him also the experience of alienation and
death on the
cross.
where the struggle is in regards to Jesus» will and Gods will being done is I believe, In Jesus flesh struggling to keep up with the Spirit if you know what I
mean... Jesus never asked to be saved John 12:27 but He prayed for strength as His soul was sorrowful even unto
death... Obviously due to the separation He would «feel»
on the
cross (I've read your article
on The Father never forsaking Jesus
on the
cross-Psalms 22:24 and 2 Cor 5:19 but just felt the separation as a man) So that's what I'm leaning towards in this whole interpretation...
Evidently this does not
mean that He was preserved from the agony of the passion and the
death on the
cross.
By this he
meant he must be raised up
on his
cross in
death in order for the people to receive the full benefit of his ministry.
Whether they fed
on him by faith in their hearts with thanksgiving by eating the bread and drinking the wine with «him at meal, or whether they gratefully permitted him to wash and dry their feet before the meal in anticipation of being cleansed by his blood
on the
cross, the
meaning of both symbols was the same: We are saved from sin and transformed into new creatures in Christ Jesus only as we freely and gladly receive from him the benefits of his passion and
death on the
cross for our redemption.
Being a Christian
means that you know what Jesus Christ did
on the
cross and, you are trusting Him to forgive you, and trusting in His
death, burial, and resurrection to be enough to cleanse you of your sin.
Rather than a relocation I
meant by escape the idea of a dangerous journey, perhaps
on foot or a perilous
crossing of angry waters under cover of darkness, risking capture and
death or life in the gulag, all for a better life.