Not exact matches
But while that is a crucial national conversation, the heated pipeline
debate sometimes means we pay a
lot less attention to the kinds
of things we should build in Canada if we're serious
about reducing carbon emissions.
There's a
lot of debate about whether buybacks are a good
thing or a bad
thing.
Discussions and
debates are more productive when all parties are well - informed on their positions, and it's hard to know a
lot of information if the only
thing you've read
about a topic is the headline to an article you didn't look at.
Also, I read a
lot of debate about whether Jesus actually did come and «clear
things up» with the Matthew 5:17 - 18.
There are a
lot of debates in the humanities
about the relative influence
of agency (the will and power
of individuals), institutions, and structure (a more abstract concepts including
things like social norms and expectations which are not formalized).
I even thought top clubs were in for him.Some three or 2 seasons back many here were
debating why he should be our main striker.As soon as you mention any other strikers name people would come out with stats and many
things defending him.Even Wenger has defended him blindly in the past.People say Wenger's stubborn yeah.But don't we know that there's a reason why everything happens?Honestly speaking he's the reason why Arsene Wenger has failed to sign a top notch striker because he still believes in him.The funny
thing is we signed Welbeck at that time who to me did nothing before to be the main man here.People keep saying Welbeck is hardworking and that he works his socks off.But the question is was that our reason for signing him.Welbeck being signed to challenge Giroud tells me a
lot about Giroud's quality.Even Walcott (no offence to him) who has zero CF qualities was even chosen over him for a string
of games and all in all I think he did well but has too many defeciencies for that role.We've compromised as a club and it'll come back to bite us.
The subject
of money is never far from the forefront
of debate between Arsenal fans
about whether Arsene Wenger and the board are running our great club the right way or if the resistance to the money way
of throwing mountains
of cash at
things is nothing more than an excuse for being tight fisted and making
lots of profit.
First let me laugh hahahahaha.Secondly, let me give credit where it is due and say that that was a great finish from Giroud.Thirdly, do you know that if Giroud did not score today he would have been criticized very badly you know why because he does a
lot of things wrongly when he does not score but when he scores everyone just ignores.How many people were actually focused on him after he scored you would realize that he breaks up a
lot of attacks.Its a pity peeps are not being honest
about him he is French and he is a very nice guy so i understand however.Lastly, it has been
about 3 seasons or so that he has been here and people are still
debating over him.Make up your mind i made mine up from day one that he arrived and realized he was awful however great classy goal.
«The widespread belief now in the Labour party that whilst Jeremy is a good man with great Labour values who has done a
lot for this party and I think changed the
debate in this country
about our economy, he's been right
about lots of things,» he said.
Food experts and nutritionists have disagreed
about a
lot of things over the years — the role
of fat, the benefits and drawbacks
of animal protein — but amidst these
debates, they have always been able to agree on at least one
thing: MORE PLANTS = GOOD.
The only adjustment — other than drinking their beers a
lot faster — is that their conversations turn from stories
of the past to
debates about what exactly they should call the
things that have taken over Newton Haven.
Although I do a
lot of work on pensions, this is an ongoing internal
debate for me personally, because I care deeply
about these other
things as well.
Good
thing about math is you can't really
debate a
lot of it.