The debate about anthropogenic global warming (AGW), in my opinion, is mostly silly.
Not exact matches
And there was this great, it was my favorite moment of the weekend and it was this very dramatic moment, when basically Emanuel was complaining a little bit, very politely, and smiling
about the fact that journalists still are doing stories
about, you know, the
debate around climate science, but there's not really, of course, there's not a
debate, there's consensus that
anthropogenic global warming is happening and that, why are you still doing these stories, asking questions?
It is a deliberate lie, scripted by ExxonMobil - funded propaganda mills disguised as «conservative think tanks», that is demonstrably false and as such it does not belong in the
debate about what to do
about anthropogenic global warming.
Anyone who thinks that there is any genuine «
debate»
about either the reality of
anthropogenic global warming and consequent climate change, or the grave threat not only to human civilization but to all life on earth if unmitigated, «business as usual»
anthropogenic global warming and consequent climate change are permitted to continue, is profoundly misinformed.
In fact there is no genuine scientific «
debate»
about the reality of
anthropogenic global warming.
What you describe is exactly the outcome that Exxon - Mobil and other fossil fuel companies desire, and have achieved by their funding of right - wing propaganda mills, disguised as «think tanks», that spew a steady stream of fake, phony, pseudoscientific bunk and employ cranks and liars to create the completely false impression that there is a genuine «
debate»
about the reality of
anthropogenic global warming.
With regard to the wider public «
debate»
about AGW, though, I don't see how it is a «bad idea» to name names of politicians who deliberately and aggressively LIE to the American people
about the reality of
anthropogenic global warming and climate change, and who engage in vicious and dishonest attacks on climate scientists.