Sentences with phrase «debate about climate change impacts»

This group, often termed climate change skeptics, contrarians, or deniers, has received large amounts of media attention and wields significant influence in the societal debate about climate change impacts and policy (7, 9 - 14).

This group, often termed climate change skeptics, contrarians, or deniers, has received large amounts of media attention and wields significant influence in the societal debate about climate change impacts and policy (7, 9 — 14).

Not exact matches

Climate Change — Want to know more about climate change — the science, impacts and political Climate Change — Want to know more about climate change — the science, impacts and political dChange — Want to know more about climate change — the science, impacts and political climate change — the science, impacts and political dchange — the science, impacts and political debate?

Professor Bruce Fitt, professor of plant pathology at the University of Hertfordshire's School of Medical and Life Sciences, said: «There is considerable debate about the impact of climate change on crop production — and making sure that we have sufficient food to feed the ever - growing global population is key to our future food security.»

Climate Change — Want to know more about global warming — the science, impacts and political debate?

Climate change is happening, and humans play a role, Pruitt said in his opening statement, but there is «continued debate and dialogue» about the human role, climate change impacts, and what to do abouClimate change is happening, and humans play a role, Pruitt said in his opening statement, but there is «continued debate and dialogue» about the human role, climate change impacts, and what to do abouclimate change impacts, and what to do about them.

The debate about climate change and its impact has been before various political bodies for some time now.

A few points that have caught my interest so far: • dealing with complex problems using complex tools, ideas • the idea of reconciliation in scientific debates is to try different approaches in an experimental meeting for attempting nonviolent communication in impassioned debates where there is disagreement • reconciliation is not about consensus, but rather creating an arena where we can have honest disagreement • violence in this debate derives from the potential impacts of climate change and the policy options, and differing political and cultural notions of risk and responsibility.

And it wasn't just weather porn — there was serious debate about the impact climate change had on the storm, and about the now - obvious need to prepare cities for worse to come.

The President has reportedly told U.S. EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt during several conversations that he supports Pruitt's plan for a «red - team, blue - team» debate aimed at challenging the prevailing scientific consensus about humans» impact on climate change, a senior administration official reportedly told E&E News.

UK Prime Minister Gordon Brown said, «I think the great thing about the Commonwealth conference is that we could find nations that were rich and poor, nations that were facing directly now climate change and nations who were debating it but hadn't felt the full impact of it, all coming together to agree something that, you know, if a third of the world can agree at the Commonwealth conference, then perhaps the whole of the world can agree at Copenhagen.»

(1) Why ethics requires great care when considering, discussing, and debating uncertainties about climate change impacts.

The people facing the worst impacts of climate change have virtually no voice in western debates about whether to do anything serious to prevent catastrophic global warming.

Yet, as we have written about before, there is one extraordinary important issue about the link between natural gas production and climate change that is rarely being reported on in the US press nor is it usually part of the US debate about natural gas fracking and its impact on climate change.

Science without an object dominates debates about climate science and the impacts of climate change.

In the meantime, during the debates about US domestic policy on climate change that have been taking place for almost thirty years, the US media has reported on climate issues almost exclusively by focusing on issues of scientific certainty about climate change impacts and economic cost to the US economy.

This phenomenon is partly attributable to the fact that economic interests opposed to US climate change policies have skillfully and successfully framed the US climate change debate as a matter about which there is insufficient scientific evidence or too much adverse impact on the US economy to warrant action.

«There's still a debate about the impact of climate change on tropical cyclones,» Lin said.

The report uses precisely - defined, and oft - debated, language to express its confidence in impacts or observations about climate change, such as:

«The People Who'll be Most Hurt by Climate Swings Did the Least to Cause Them, Study Says» (Chris Mooney, Washington Post) «There has been a lot of debate about how rich countries can help poor countries to adapt, but they have overlooked this aspect — that the impacts of climate variability change might be worse in the poorer countries,» said Sebastian Bathiany, a climate change researcher at Wageningen University in the Netherlands who led the research published in Science Advances....Climate Swings Did the Least to Cause Them, Study Says» (Chris Mooney, Washington Post) «There has been a lot of debate about how rich countries can help poor countries to adapt, but they have overlooked this aspect — that the impacts of climate variability change might be worse in the poorer countries,» said Sebastian Bathiany, a climate change researcher at Wageningen University in the Netherlands who led the research published in Science Advances....climate variability change might be worse in the poorer countries,» said Sebastian Bathiany, a climate change researcher at Wageningen University in the Netherlands who led the research published in Science Advances....climate change researcher at Wageningen University in the Netherlands who led the research published in Science Advances....»

I wish that I were struggling to stay focused on climate science today rather than commenting on the vigorous discussion in last night's US presidential debate about the ongoing, huge and escalating economic impacts of climate change...

If it is the multitude of scientific debates about climate feedbacks, sensitivity, tipping elements, relative impacts of climate change on natural systems, etc. then I do agree.

I agree that there is plenty of legitimate debate about how much the climate will change and how bad the impacts will be for humans.

Climate Change — Want to know more about global warming: the science, impacts and political debate?

Ensure that an Indigenous perspective is provided on issues across government (such as in relation to issues which have a broader impact or focus than just Indigenous peoples — for instance, debates about climate change, social inclusion or homelessness);