Not exact matches
These discussions
about compatibility have their place, but if we spend all our time justifying which side of the gender
equality debate we're on, the conversation will never truly progress and the Church will never become the advocate for women it could be.
The moral problem, as MacIntyre describes it, is evident enough: arguments
about just war, abortion, capital punishment, or
equality lead inevitably to shrill and sterile
debate.
Instead of being confined to hidebound formulations, Mother's Day has served to locate cultural
debates about women and
equality.
Yes, it was actually precisely because I was writing
about life on the other side of the gender
debates, advocating for the full
equality of women, that I rediscovered, appreciated, and began to love my brother, Paul.
I think she did suggest these differences: - appeal to bottom vs appeal to middle - attack
equality from gvt vs do it from opposition That sounds to me like the «can we talk
about inequality or not»
debate around 1999 - 2001, not the
debate about how to tackle inequality that we want,
In some ways the
debate about how to advance the
equalities agenda is like the
debate about the future of Labour in the 1990s.
This doesn't give us any property rights [or] pension rights, it does nothing to give us
equality, it is all
about Westminster
debate, political activists doing something the rest of us haven't actually even asked for.»
During last night's Illinois senate
debate Alexi Giannoulias and Mark Kirk were asked
about the military's «Don't Ask, Don't Tell» policy as well as marriage
equality.
It has been the center of
debates about social
equality, health, and fiscal feasibility.
At the time of renewed
debates about consents and gender
equality as well as the rising power of nativist men's rights activists, artists such as Bernstein, Tompkins, and Schneemann, but also Juanita McNeely, Joan Semmel and Valie Export have come to the spotlight.
They've also created signage
about warmongering politicians, the marriage -
equality debate, and gender inequality in industries like tech, film and music.
A scapegoat in the sense that everything centres on you're either for or against
equality and diversity when in many cases the
debates are really
about other underlying issues — either issues that the debaters are blind to or so caught up in the heat of opposing each other that they can't see the forest for the trees and one thing leads to another and descend into incivility.
The most hurtful
debate about marriage
equality critiques the ability of same - sex couples to parent, claiming their children have poor psychological outcomes.
«We need to have an honest
debate about gay marriage
equality,» he said.