It would've been a bit too open - handed for Come Sunday to show a full - on theological
debate about hell, but in the absence of that conversation, it's important to show both sides in full.
Not exact matches
Let me just ask one question: Can we PLEASE start the
debate in the country
about how «God», «
Hell», «Heaven», «Satan», «Muhammad», «Jesus», «Angels» «Ghosts» «Demons» and «Spirits of the Dead and or / Nature / Mother Earth» do not exist in any rational form as the way they are presented throughout world history?
Rumbling beneath all of the evangelical
debates about sovereignty, science, heaven, and
hell are some serious questions
about the Bible.
The interesting thing
about this whole
debate is how our ideas of how we interpret what the Bible says
about what
hell would be like have changed over time.
The
debate surrounding the release of Rob Bell's new book
about heaven and
hell has taken such an ugly, polarizing turn that one would think there are only two positions available to Christians — Calvinism or universalism.
I've read a lot of the more controversial postings recently (such as the recent ones on
Hell and Homosexuality as well as some older ones
about the definition of the gospel) where it seems that the
debates in the comment section always fail (at least for me) to help those who are trying to learn.
I am not preaching simply
debating your position that the Bible is
about punishment,
hell and worship.
In the
debate about whether science is cool again, one answer remained unuttered, so, what the
hell, I might as well say it: No.