That's why we need to have a more honest
debate about issues like this, something I'm sure you as a writer can appreciate.
Not exact matches
Generally there are a number of larger
issues that will shape the larger
debate,
like (hopefully an end to the never ending
debate about) the closure of the City Centre Airport or the financing of Daryl Katz «s downtown arena — but so much
about municipal politics falls under the old adage «all politics is local.»
I suspected I'd get a little pushback from fellow Christians who hold a complementarian perspective on gender, (a position that requires women to submit to male leadership in the home and church, and often appeals to «biblical womanhood» for support), but I had hoped — perhaps naively — that the book would generate a vigorous, healthy
debate about things
like the Greco Roman household codes found in the epistles of Peter and Paul,
about the meaning of the Hebrew word ezer or the Greek word for deacon,
about the Paul's line of argumentation in 1 Timothy 2 and 1 Corinthians 11,
about our hermeneutical presuppositions and how they are influenced by our own culture, and
about what we really mean when we talk
about «biblical womanhood» — all
issues I address quite seriously in the book, but which have yet to be engaged by complementarian critics.
In general, based on the 2003 interview, it doesn't look
like Santorum knows how to talk or think
about this
issue very well; he doesn't, for example, appear to know how to distinguish the three levels of the right to privacy
debate: a) the natural rights level, b) the Constitutional level, and c) the plain - old law level, state and federal.
I might add here that this situation unfortunately describes the supposed bedsharing
debate: those that support informed choice to bedshare and who,
like myself, who deplore inaccurate, simplistic generalizations
about the «dangers» of sleeping with baby (and misrepresentations
about the bedsharing
issue, who differ from the governments position) are demonized, belittled at professional meetings sponsored by professional groups (
like First Candle) and attempts to ostracize repeatedly take place.
What we should surely be aware of is that these
issues connect directly with the much broader and ongoing global
debate about the future of government and the challenge that the rise of non-democratic countries,
like China, pose to the universal aspirations of liberal democracy.
I believe Sen. Perkins,
like I am, is happy to meet the challenge head on, to have honest and up - front
debates about the
issues and let the voters decide.»
«With spending
like that, regular
debates about real
issues will probably take a back seat to advertising.»
The real voice of reason in this race comes instead from left field, from Green Party candidate Howie Hawkins, who has waged a consistently serious race and who on Wednesday
issued a call for his fellow candidates to stop arguing
about sports teams and
debate issues like jobs, health care and climate change.
De Blasio has complained
about disproportionate attention to the charter
debate, at the expense of
issues like teacher retention, and he returned to those «foundational problems» on Sunday morning.
Today's lead editorial in the Times Union lambasted Cuomo & Astorino for failing to run serious campaigns and praised Howie Hawkins, writing «The real voice of reason in this race comes instead from left field, from Green Party candidate Howie Hawkins, who has waged a consistently serious race and who on Wednesday
issued a call for his fellow candidates to stop arguing
about sports teams and
debate issues like jobs, health care and climate change.»
MPs know what the grassroots are thinking
about issues like last week's EU
debate and on the other side of the coin we can keep track of how they are voting.
«But when something
like this happens, emotions impact the
debate, and that will play a role in how people feel
about the
issues.»
That question is not simply a matter for intellectual
debate, as is evident in the controversy surrounding an
issue like abortion, which is fundamentally a
debate about when a fetus becomes a conscious person.
Using multi-layered topics
like children's rights, leadership, restorative justice, and homelessness as jumping off points, my students have participated in simulations, collaborated with students in other countries, and participated in
debates about complex
issues.
As long as you're willing to exchange your ideas and views
about things with the civility that — I'm glad to say — most commentators I've seen have used so far on this
issue, then your perspective is something we'd
like to know
about in our online
debate Wednesday and / or our comments section here on the column.
They're not oppositional
like a
debate, we gather people to talk
about a variety of
issues and develop some approaches.
There is much more to the
debate about overpopulation, which deals with touchy
issues like population control (think China) and other ethical
issues, but those are too numerous and complicated to get into here (unless the blog owner chooses in the future to tackle them in greater depth).
Issues like the Medieval warm period, different possible causes of climate change (such as solar activity, or even the nature of our climate), studies indicating the last interglacial period was warmer than today, and the failure of recent dire predictions
about the climate all show the
debate on climate change is not nearly as settled as many global warming proponents would have us believe.
JimD I appreciate this point Its seems
like failure of the models does count just as matter of scientific
debate (especially since the predictions called for extreme changes) but I hear what you're saying and will consider your point as I gradually learn more
about this
issue well stated, even though it lacked bold typeface for emphasis:)
Sounds
like Gavin is saying there are no
issues to
debate about the science related to these
issues.
Regarding Alex Merz's comment: the problem with the
debate about global warming (and many other environmental
issues) is that the uninformed are thinking that they ARE informed because they are getting their information well - spun from «authorities»
like Crichton and Lomborg and Gregg Easterbrook and Patrick Michaels.
I agree that many of the
issues I'd
like to discuss do not imply directly climate science and should perhaps be discussed elsewhere, such as the amount of FF reserves, the effect of a tax, the discussion
about the benefit - cost of fossils and so on, but they are nevertheless important in the
debate, and many of you seem to have also some ideas
about them.
OK, so the Pixel 2 XL might have a display problem.First, there was an
issue about its colour vibrancy, which, honestly, we think might be
like the great blue / gold dress
debate.
First, there was an
issue about its colour vibrancy, which, honestly, we think might be
like the great blue / gold dress
debate.
So before we start having the conversation and
debate about appropriate models of service delivery to address such an
issue like scabies, and who should lead such models, let's first consider the needs and current infrastructure in each community, to determine where the sustainable efforts for such a project will come from to ensure long - term results.