Or take the current
debate about justification.
Not exact matches
In a second article
about the practical implications of the
justification debate, this question was asked:
I wanted to share this summary from Christianity Today
about the current
debate between theologians N.T. Wright and John Piper regarding the nature of
justification.
In case you were not aware, there is a big
debate among New Testament scholars today
about what Paul meant by
justification.
Unless one bleaches the
debate of its living doctrinal substance — and the Rav explicitly states that requiring men of faith to bracket their deepest experiences constitutes unacceptable censorship — it inevitably raises questions
about atonement,
justification, faith and works, and so on.
Nevertheless, despite the ongoing
debate about the theoretical
justifications for punitive damages, nearly all fifty states and federal courts have accepted the doctrine of punitive damages.10 Indeed, punitive damages have a long historical pedigree dating back to the Hammurabi Code in 2000 B.C. 11