The vigorous and open national
debate about nuclear power and the efforts to provide for safe long - term waste disposal are both commendable aspects of a successful nuclear program.
The debate about nuclear power is moot.
Less edifying here is the puerile
debate about nuclear power.
Q: How does the show tackle
the debate about nuclear power?
Not exact matches
It ought to come as a surprise to no one, therefore, that from the time of the first splitting of the atom down through the destruction of Hiroshima and on to current controversies
about nuclear weapons and
power plants, Christian people have been involved individually and corporately at every level of the
debate, not incidentally but specifically because of their Christian commitment.
«Such,» they said, «is the talismanic
power of
nuclear weaponry that few politicians seem willing to trust the electorate with a real
debate about the military capacity we need in the world of today.»
Nowadays, with talk of expanding the share of
nuclear power in the electricity - producing world,
debate about the remaining amount of uranium on earth has resurfaced.
> I think that your comments have a bit of «begging the question»
about them, in suggesting that the necessity of expanding
nuclear power to reduce GHG emissions from electricity generation is an established fact, upon which any «
debate»
about addressing AGW must be based — rather than an unproven assertion to be argued.
We'd better begin a public
debate about whether it is feasible or desirable to construct any new
nuclear power plants.
In this
debate we often find scientific leftists who are willing to consider the precautionary principle for
nuclear power and global warming suddenly becoming very adventurous
about the effects of new scientific and industrial developments on the environment.
The divisions the bills have created within the state — with the utility commission, some lawmakers, clean energy advocates and the executive branch on one side, and Xcel and other members of the legislature on the other — echo wider
debates about large
nuclear power plants in the U.S., and who should pay for them.