Story says, «The letter urges followers to frame this as
a debate about religious freedom, not contraception, because it's a more effective way to sway public opinion.»
The letter urges followers to frame this as
a debate about religious freedom, not contraception, because it's a more effective way to sway public opinion.
That's the future of
the debate about religious liberty in America.
At times
the debate about religious language seems like a pitched battle between political camps of the left and the right.
In March 2009, Coppedge claims that his supervisor advised him that co-workers had complained that he was harassing them over
debates about his religious views and coercing them in the workplace into watching DVD programs about intelligent design.
Louis Fisher surveys the full sweep of U.S. history» from colonial
debates about religious liberty to modern judicial, legislative, and executive positions on the status of conscientious objection, compulsory flag salutes, school prayer, Indian religious practices, and the religious use of peyote.
Not exact matches
you sir are practicing a religion one that means so much to you that you use it as your online name also please show me where I call you a fool or is telling someone not to make a fool of themself the same as calling them a fool which would mean you are very
religious as far as Colin he said nothing that related to the
debate I was in with you... we are talking
about Atheism as a
religious view not
debating the existence of God now look over the definitions I have shown you and please explain how Atheism does not fit into the said definitions And you claim that evolution is true so the burden of proof falls in your lap as it is the base of your religion.
Today this overlaps with
debates about the actual content of
religious education and
about the freedom to offer children what the Church really teaches.
In fact, as John Fletcher, ethicist at the University of Virginia, has said, «You don't have to be
religious to realize that there ought to be a
debate about....
My comments
about whiny christians, laptop dogooders, etc... comes from the many negative comments my husband has towards tv evangilism,
religious debates that he has listened to, articles in newspapers, & obviously his / our personal experiences.
Recent
debates about atheism and
religious belief often involve appeals to the natural sciences.
As
debate continues over President Obama's assertion
about the
religious nature (or lack thereof) of the Islamic State (ISIS) terrorist group, a new Pew Research Center study finds that more Americans across the board believe that Islam encourages violence more than other religions.
Even more sad is that this article is
about real heroes and the point of the article is lost in this
religious debate.
But increasingly the
debate is becoming one
about religion, in which critics accuse backers of the referendum of bigotry and insist a ban would violate the First Amendment's
religious freedoms.
This book breaks new ground both in Jewish thought and in larger
debates about the philosophical and
religious grounding of political theory.
He spoke of the prestige of science in our culture and the corresponding lack of respect for religion («If it's a science programme it's a documentary, if the subject's politics there's a
debate, but a
religious programme, unless it's hymns for granny, will have people talking
about their feelings»).
The few sustained
debates about «
religious tests» and «
religious freedom» treated the potential for
religious monopolies, hegemonies or majorities - and even religion itself - as a problem.
You could then read the whole
debate about whether the Cross is really the best way to convey the liberation and love consciousness that many Christians today wish to see as central to their
religious beliefs (read the
debate — its fascinating).
Their presence challenges the
religious establishment to make room for new partners in interfaith councils and in ongoing
debates about the relation between church and state.
And from raging
debates about creationism to political candidates proclaiming their
religious convictions, religion seems to be at the centre of American life.
I am particularly concerned
about the attempt to wed so closely this
debate over the nature of the church with
religious and political communion.
The objective of this approach is not to present the
religious view on a particular subject, but to generate public discussion and
debate about significant issues of the day from many different
religious perspectives and viewpoints.
Just because we aren't talking
about debate questions or party platforms on Facebook doesn't mean we stop standing up for the unborn, raising our voices for
religious liberty, caring for refugees, pursuing racial reconciliation, and more.
A fierce
debate among academics
about secularization theory — the view that societies will become less
religious as they modernize — seems to have been won by the skeptics.
I definitely love to
debate, discuss
religious matters with just
about anyone, always taking the devil's advocate's position.
As I studied, I got to wondering
about what Jesus had to say
about all of this, and the passage that suddenly jumped into my mind was the passage in which the
religious leaders try to best Jesus in a theological
debate by asking him
about the post-resurrection marital status of a (hypothetical) woman who had been married seven times.
It is significant that the terms of the
debate about faith in the world are deemed to have been set by people like Richards Dawkins, just as it is significant that the
debate is seen as a «political and secular», rather than a
religious, one.
Read the full story
about the fight in the US Senate over Christmas on the CNN Political Ticker Editor's Note: A number of
religious groups are joining in on the
debate too.
Pick any person,
religious or not, and you can be
about 99 % certain that person's opinion of how Jesus would feel
about the healthcare
debate matches their own.
When push comes to shove, is this
debate really
about the symbolic denigration of a
religious practice, or is the worry that once some parents find out
about the risks, they'll reject received dogma and discard the practice?
The present political situation in Latin America has generated so much heated
debate about the Church, the «sects,» and
religious freedom that it has become necessary to take a closer look at the existing
religious scene, including Pentecostalism, if we are to build a coherent theological overview of the region capable of generating serious ecumenical dialogue.
With all the furor and dishonesty over the Supreme Court's decisions on contraception and the
Religious Freedom Restoration Act, it's a good moment to think
about what kinds of structural weaknesses the center - right has in public
debate and what can be done to address some of those weaknesses.
By: Jillian Lauren There's a piece in the NYTimes today
about iPhone apps that give you zingy one - liners and rhetorical strategies to aid you in
debating those pesky
religious fundamentalists.
If you are
debating whether or not it is important to circumcise your boy it is important to consider your cultural and
religious beliefs as well as speaking to your pediatrician
about the potential medical pros and cons of this procedure.
But the Eweida case reveals something significant
about the state of the
religious debate in the UK.
These shrines are venerated by local Muslims, although there has always been a
debate within Islam in west Africa
about the place of shrines and saints in
religious observance.
Mercifully, there were no questions
about so - called «
religious freedom» — which has replaced «family values» as the preferred code word for anti-gay bigotry — during last night's GOP presidential
debate.
The
debate about whether we should have positions reserved for
religious figures in the House of Lords is for another day but for now the fact remains, until we have women bishops, women in the UK do not have full political emancipation.
While
religious leaders are as entitled as anyone else to express their views
about the Assisted Dying Bill -
about to be
debated in Parliament - there is no doubt the media give the opinions of «faith leaders» disproportionate prominence.
When compared to other
religious groups, Evangelicals have often been more wary of science as evidenced in
debates about evolution, stem cell research, and climate change.
A group of
about 20
religious activists associated with Young Evangelicals for Climate Action traveled to the
debate to hold prayer sessions asking that both candidates embrace the «moral» challenge of climate change.
They will learn
about it's provenance, it's practices and it's philosophy before engaging in a
debate over whether or not it should be granted
religious status in the UK.
And there is a perennial
debate about whether the state should support private schools that are mostly
religious, do not require teachers to hold credentials and are not required to meet minimal performance standards.
About Site - ROME REPORTS, is an independent international TV News Agency based in Rome covering the activity of the Pope, the life of the Vatican and current social, cultural and
religious debates.
With recent
debates about political,
religious, gender and racial representation, we were drawn to artists whose work genuinely engages with the subjects explored in it.
In the video, Wallinger opens a
debate about the real capacity of the viewer's vision, addressing the question of the search for empirical truth and
religious faith.
Part of the reason that elements of the climate change
debate take on
religious proportions — by the activists for and against policy — is that folks have so dug in around almost every aspect of the
debate that it is hard to raise a question
about some uncritically accepted element of the
religious canon without folks first attacking you as an untrained heathen.
Religious metaphors are already used to frame portions of the debate about geoengineering, a fact suggested by the prominent use of religious metaphors in contemporary discussions about «playing god,» to avoid a «climate apocalyps
Religious metaphors are already used to frame portions of the
debate about geoengineering, a fact suggested by the prominent use of
religious metaphors in contemporary discussions about «playing god,» to avoid a «climate apocalyps
religious metaphors in contemporary discussions
about «playing god,» to avoid a «climate apocalypse.»
They talk
about wide range of subjects including feminist
debates around pornography and sex work, University of Chicago's recent statement on safe spaces, freedom of speech and political correctness, cyber sex - work, Bedford Vs. Canada case, and the common grounds between radical feminism and the
religious far - right.
Im not a
religious scholar and as a secular atheist I do nt care much for
debates about theology as they are based on a premise I do nt accept.