Story says, «The letter urges followers to frame this as
a debate about religious freedom, not contraception, because it's a more effective way to sway public opinion.»
The letter urges followers to frame this as
a debate about religious freedom, not contraception, because it's a more effective way to sway public opinion.
Not exact matches
Today this overlaps with
debates about the actual content of
religious education and
about the
freedom to offer children what the Church really teaches.
But increasingly the
debate is becoming one
about religion, in which critics accuse backers of the referendum of bigotry and insist a ban would violate the First Amendment's
religious freedoms.
The few sustained
debates about «
religious tests» and «
religious freedom» treated the potential for
religious monopolies, hegemonies or majorities - and even religion itself - as a problem.
The present political situation in Latin America has generated so much heated
debate about the Church, the «sects,» and
religious freedom that it has become necessary to take a closer look at the existing
religious scene, including Pentecostalism, if we are to build a coherent theological overview of the region capable of generating serious ecumenical dialogue.
With all the furor and dishonesty over the Supreme Court's decisions on contraception and the
Religious Freedom Restoration Act, it's a good moment to think
about what kinds of structural weaknesses the center - right has in public
debate and what can be done to address some of those weaknesses.
Mercifully, there were no questions
about so - called «
religious freedom» — which has replaced «family values» as the preferred code word for anti-gay bigotry — during last night's GOP presidential
debate.
They talk
about wide range of subjects including feminist
debates around pornography and sex work, University of Chicago's recent statement on safe spaces,
freedom of speech and political correctness, cyber sex - work, Bedford Vs. Canada case, and the common grounds between radical feminism and the
religious far - right.
They talk
about wide range of subjects including feminist
debates around pornography and sex work, University of Chicago's recent statement on safe spaces,
freedom of speech and political correctness, cyber sex - work, Bedford [v] Canada case, and the common grounds between radical feminism and the
religious far - right.»