Sentences with phrase «debate as framed»

Why should we accept the debate as framed by them?

Not exact matches

Public debate in Ontario tends to frame sales - tax harmonization either as an unjustified «tax grab» or as a needed contribution to the deteriorating provincial budget.

As I stated at the time, the intense debate leading up to the official unveiling of the plan gave the perception of an end - result, but the FCC's plan is merely a set of proposals and guidelines that basically frame the real debate — which is just beginning.

The NDP could have framed this debate as one of protecting Alberta jobs and an Alberta - based company, rather than just about cancelling a contract with a giant Australian company (it was later announced that an appeal panel determined that Alberta Health Services breached its duty of procedural fairness in the RFP process in a substantive manner).

Because on investigation of the text it is noted that Jesus accepted Scripture as his sole and divine authority (admittedly Jesus» pronouncements and actions were not framed in the context of the twentieth - century debate on authority, but his trust in Scripture still seems incontrovertible), Christians similarly believe the Bible to be basic to their faith and life.

As controversy about religion at the academy became more and more public, Focus on the Family jumped into the fray and created a video, shown at its headquarters, that attempts to frame the debate.

To describe the Church as a community of memory and hope, sharing in the common memory not only of Jesus Christ but also of the mighty deeds of God known by Israel, expecting the coming into full view of the kingdom on earth and / or in heaven; to describe it further as the community of worship, united by its direction toward one God, who is Father, Son and Holy Spirit yet worshipped more as Father or as Son or as Holy Spirit in this or that part of the community; to describe it as a community of thought in which debate and conflict can take place because there is a fundamental frame of agreement and because there are common issues of great import — to do all this and the much more that needs to be done would be to essay the work of a large part of theology.

The letter urges followers to frame this as a debate about religious freedom, not contraception, because it's a more effective way to sway public opinion.

Story says, «The letter urges followers to frame this as a debate about religious freedom, not contraception, because it's a more effective way to sway public opinion.»

[To restate this: Complementarians want to frame the debate as being between those who support the authority of Scripture and those who reject the authority of Scripture.

The abortion debate has long been framed as a deadlock between two extremes.

Where an otherwise irrelevant character makes for good debate, so the news entertainment industry frames his every move as significant, and soon this irrelevant character has been news for long enough that eventually he does do something noteworthy, and he becomes the biggest story in America.

As news of all forms devolves into entertainment, and entertainment devolves into shouting matches framed as debate, we need something to shout abouAs news of all forms devolves into entertainment, and entertainment devolves into shouting matches framed as debate, we need something to shout abouas debate, we need something to shout about.

As well as the title of the debate...... no one in their right frame would wan na do that, unless his fitness is threatened.........As well as the title of the debate...... no one in their right frame would wan na do that, unless his fitness is threatened.........as the title of the debate...... no one in their right frame would wan na do that, unless his fitness is threatened...........

In addition, the debate is often framed in terms of «social justice» for fathers in societies which prioritise mothers over fathers as the socially accepted best carers of children.

And he framed the debate over increasing the state's minimum wage — currently $ 7.25 — as a sort - of trickle - up economics.

Occasionally, the debate is framed as a «town - hall event» with questions from the audience.

In short, the continued possibility of independence may frame political debate within in the UK in negative and corrosive terms, with Scotland's interests understood as distinct from, and potentially in tension with, those of the rest of the UK.

In Europe, North America, and some regions with strong historical benefits inherited by descendants from these regions, racism debate often gets framed in terms of white benefit / privilege, and this is often described as due to the overwhelming one - sided benefits gained by that ethnic group specifically (and to an extent those able to pass).

All too often the green energy debate is framed as «nuclear v renewables», when nuclear works in collaboration with renewable technologies, not in competition.

In the debate, Cruz doubled - down on Trump's «New York values» which he framed as being about big money, big media and socially liberal values on abortion.

Instead of this practical approach that focuses on the benefits to everyone, the argument is framed as «my idea versus your idea», sort of like a Catholic vs Protestant debate, one that will never be resolved to the satisfaction of both.

Instead, Cuomo framed the debate over the tax abatement, which is expected to pick up when state lawmakers return to Albany next month after an extended break, as a union battle for them to fight over the prevailing wage.

He warned against framing the debate as «mean - spirited» as it could put off many potential Ukip voters who appreciate the fact that Britain is a generous place.

I would have thought the book's organisers could well have a better chance of more influence in framing party debates beyond the core of their own faction if they were to involve a broader range of voices, perhaps including senior supporters of Ed Miliband such as John Denham, and thoughtful voices who did not vote first for either Miliband, such as John Healey.

De Blasio pointed out, as he has repeatedly since this debate began, that New York City residents, through fares and state and city taxes, pay the vast majority of the MTA's expenses anyway (something that prompted one budget expert to describe the entire framing of this debate as «stupid.»)

The NRA has cynically framed the debate as a choice between banning all guns and doing nothing.

«This has profound implications for the current policy debate that frames environmental goals and economic goals as at odds with each other.»

I'm not going to get into the nitty - gritty of the debate here, except to say that I think it's a mistake to frame this debate as an «either - or.»

The screenplay also sees the group as being clever about the attention (since there's no such thing as bad publicity) and smart about framing the debate as an issue of free speech.

Barron and Darling - Hammond describe evidence - based approaches to support inquiry - based teaching in the classroom: (1) clear goals and guiding activities; (2) a variety of resources (e.g., museums, libraries, Internet, videos, lectures) and time for students to share, reflect, and apply resources, while debating over information discrepancies; (3) participation structures and classroom norms that increase the use of evidence and a culture of collaboration (i.e., framing debates as productive conflicts, using public performances); (4) formative assessments that provide opportunities for revision; and (5) summative assessments that are multidimensional and representative of professional practice.

I'd welcome the chance to frame school choice as a debate about whether Washington ought to be telling states and communities how to run their schools, and to turn the issue into a referendum on how one feels about Trump.

[1](Some might argue these two interpretations - badges to increase engagement and badges as gamified learning environment - are distinct enough to belong in different frames, given the different roles they play in the debates over badges.)

Every time one comments one invites a response, but the responses that follow are generally tailored to the previous comment as that frames the debate, except maybe in your case.

Even if in the United States, the discussion about climate change continues to be framed as a debate, Goodell isn't arguing its...

It's interesting to me that traditional publishers have been successful in framing this as Amazon vs. Authors and portraying Amazon as the bad guy in this debate.

While out on my journalistic beat covering certain aspects of the Amazon / Hachette debate, I've had occasion to discuss the prevailing attitudes of some who continue to frame self - publishing as «the realm of the subpar,» as one snarky commenter put it.

It is unfortunate that the debate about free - roaming cats is often framed as pro-cat and anti-wildlife, or vice-versa.

Such insistence framed debates around careers as wide ranging as Robert Mapplethorpe and Kara Walker, even as the culture wars of the 1990s further conflated black bodies with either sexual excess or moral danger.

As a student, she co-founded Free Cooper Union, helping coordinate the lock - in, occupation, and other creative actions which framed Cooper's crisis as part of a national debate on educatioAs a student, she co-founded Free Cooper Union, helping coordinate the lock - in, occupation, and other creative actions which framed Cooper's crisis as part of a national debate on educatioas part of a national debate on education.

In this state of relative non-recognition within the discourse and debate around art and culture in general, the subject of the «reductive» as a possible antithesis to the overpowering reintroduction of representational painting and at the same time to the emergence of the focus on new media, technology and photography, has regained considerable strength over the last decade within an international frame of cultural production and commerce, as well as through the firmly held lone positions of artists like Mosset, Charlton, Armleder, Morellet, Palermo and others throughout the 80's and 90's.

Peabody Energy tries to frame the debate as «U.S. coal supplies versus natural gas.»

I know some here will decry that I am not talking about the issues because I do not try to obsfuscate with a discussion of the spot market price of coal vs long - term contracts, or use of coal in locations other than Kansas, or Al Gore's footprint, but the issue of Global Warming IS politics (non-ratification of Kyoto and negative flag - waving ads about politicians who oppose coal), it IS public relations («Clean Coal», cleanest coal - fired plants, surface mining and mountain - top reoval rather than strip mining, etc.), and it IS about misrepresentation (Peobody framing the debate as coal vs NG when it is really coal vs every other energy source), and it IS about greed (the coal industry doing everything it can to scuttle every other energy alternative).

Framing climate - change costs as the equivalent of a hidden rising tax could be useful in debates over a climate response.

So this is not really the «debate» that the contrarians would like to make it out to be, and most scientists, as well as people who have accepted that climate science points to the need for stronger action, have no more interest in letting the Heartland and NIPCC folks hijack the public discourse and getting the media to frame the narrative in their terms.

Framing carbon removal as a «third way» risks even further «neglect [of carbon removal] in political negotiations and public debate,» (as you write in the article) as policymakers might see carbon removal as a distraction to prolong business - as - usual production of GHG emissions, which it clearly is not.

Roberts frames the debate as «Science versus Conservatives».

Unfortunately, «Meet the Press» can not deal with any issue without framing it as a binary debate between two opposing partisans, with the assumption being that «the truth» lies directly between their views.

A tactic used by ethanol backers trying to defend the relatively defenseless Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) is attempting to frame the RFS debate as one between America's oil and natural gas companies and renewable energy.

This is because within this framing transparency is seen as either a) ammunition — a way for those on the outer edges of the debate to target those in the arena whom they disagree with in order to discredit them; or b) a shield — a way to protect the status quo through the illusion of accountability.