Sentences with phrase «debate between which»
You've survived the tiny phase, where there is a divisive debate between which stage is worse: two years old or three years old.
http://www.breastfeedbabywearclothdiaper.com/ Not exact matches
Nine months have passed since the first GOP primary debate, where Kelly confronted the billionaire real estate mogul with past misogynistic comments he has made, leading to months of clashes between the two in which Trump regularly insulted Kelly via social media and skipped a pair of subsequent Fox News debates.
The Fox News debate held early last month brought in a record 24 million viewers, 7.9 million of which were between 25 and 54 years old, making this the most - watched GOP primary debate ever.
Cameron's personal involvement in the story has ensured that the debate over the use of tax havens has generated more heat than light, with little distinction being made between the mere use of tax - neutral jurisdictions to manage international investment, which in itself is legitimate, and criminal tax evasion.
The first presidential debate between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump, which was expected to draw in excess of 100 million viewers, largely lived up to the hype.
The Monday - night matchup millions of Americans have been waiting months for is the first presidential debate between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton, which takes place Sept. 26 at Hofstra University in New York.
Significant debate remains between the White House and Hill Republicans on elements of any final tax reform package, including which deductions to target, how low to push the corporate rate and how companies deduct business investments.
There have been contentious debates amongst financial market participants, current and former FED officials, as well as between prominent economists (Professor Shane Greenstein on Quora also outlined his view, which I agree).
A recent debate on strategic voting between Erin Weir and Matthew Bergbusch prompts me to wonder the extent to which liberals are more progressive than conservatives in the federal political arena.
GoldMoney research director Alasdair Macleod has revisited the old correlation in economics between the general price level and interest rates, «Gibson's paradox,» which economists long debated, or at least did before it seemed to break down in recent decades.
As the quality of life between East and West slowly merges due to advances in technology, continued urbanization and changing demographics, opportunities across numerous industries will arise which we aim to point out and debate.
Sue I recall a study to see if serpents could talk and low and behold there was a debate between atheist and fundamentalist which finally broke down into God can do anything vs. physiology.
It has added no luster to the history of American rhetoric that the institutionalization of presidential debates, which began in 1976, featured a matchup between Gerald Ford and Jimmy Carter.
In its time until today, the bible and other faiths, Islam, hinduism, and the rest are right or correct in their times because it provided the religious needs of humans in their period.The provider of all of this God himself by allowing this to happen, Now through his will a new religion, panthrotheism is forthcoming, the debates between the atheists and the theists now is ongoing, the result which will take generations to resolve will be this new religion.
But the charge puts me in mind of the colloquium discussion in the January issue of First Things which treated the debate between so - called «liberal» and «radical» Catholics, perhaps because my contribution to that discussion has elicited similar accusations of political irresponsibility or moral cowardice from people sympathetic to the liberal line of thought.
Noll points to an 1845 public debate between Nathaniel Rice (pro-slavery) and Jonathan Blanchard (anti-slavery) which lasted for eight hours a day, for four days!
I made a point of asking about this at the conference, and theologian Peter Enns offered a brief response, noting that central to this debate is Romans 5 and 1 Corinthians 15 in which Paul draws his famous parallel between Jesus and Adam.
In the debates over humanitarian intervention in the 1990s some moralists made a distinction between «war,» which they understood as having to do with state uses of armed force for their own interests, and intervention by military force for humanitarian purposes, which they regarded as altruistic and not «war.»
By then defining «nature» in terms of relationship (instead of either static concept or unlimited dynamism) he was able to offer a solution to the old conundrum about the relationship between grace and nature, in a way which avoids the excessively arid and abstract terms with which this important debate has so often been carried on.
There is lively debate on the extent, if any to which process thought is an advance on more traditional ways of thinking about omnipotence; for example, see the recent exchange between David Griffin and William Hasker in this journal (29:194 - 236).
It extends to all situations in which a judgment or a decision can be made only at the end of a debate or confrontation between adverse opinions and conflicting points of view.
The loose use of the concept of «chance», which has plagued so much of the debate between science and religion, seems to be in some way related to at least two issues.
Their other new venture is the Science — Faith Archive, which gathers together a number of on - line resources — books, papers and magisterial discourses — on the theme of the debate and dialogue between science and faith.
I know there's always a debate between those who read the Bible literally and those who don't, and I think it's a legitimate debate within the Christian community of which I'm a part.
In September, Time magazine organized a debate between Collins and Dawkins which touched on all the crucial issues: the false idea that science and faith should be held as not overlapping; the place of Darwinian evolution in the plan of God; the fine - tuning of the physical constants of nature; the literal interpretation of Genesis; the place of miracles including the incarnation and the resurrection of Jesus; and the origin of the moral law within the human heart.
For a vigorous debate of these questions, readers can turn to an essay series at Public Discourse, which finished yesterday, between professors Patrick Deneen (Notre Dame), Phillip Muñoz (Notre Dame), and Nathan Schlueter (Hillsdale).
«I know there's always a debate between those who read the Bible literally and those who don't, and that I think it's a legitimate debate within the Christian community of which I'm a part.
Christians have had similar debates, with views ranging between those who advocated «Double Predestination», which is the view that God determines those who will be saved and those who will be damned, and Pelagians who hold that human beings have freedom to choose or deny God.
It is this view and spirit which lies back of most of the controversial preaching and the great debates between leaders of different denominations during the first half of the nineteenth century.
After debating between several, I settled on this, which... Continue reading →
The long - term debate between Aussies and Brits about which is better is one bloody battle.
Just looking back to conversation and how it began, now realised you suddenly popped in between without knowing what the debate was.The debate was started when a person signified that we do smart tranfers unlike other teams, to which I said getting 4 quality players for 77 odd million is smart and I also wanted to know what smart actually means and thats why I picked old examples.
The subject of which has better coaches: private or public school always seems to spark some petty good debate but my experience and insight into the differences between private and public school sports is a subject that I have spent some time studying for the last year, and I have made some really profound discoveries.
As a companion piece to Keith Cronin's excellent article on the use of PRP in which the both sides of the debate about PRP are presented, and based on a point - counterpoint debate conducted via email between the two experts whose views are expressed in Keith's piece, Dr. Nathan Mall, associate physician for the St. Louis Cardinals and Director for the St. Louis Center for Cartilage Restoration and RepairRegeneration Orthopedics, and Andrew M. Blecher MD, a Primary Care Sports Medicine physician and Medical Director of the Center for Rehabilitation Medicine at the Southern California Orthopedic Institute in Van Nuys, California, here are what Drs. Mall and Blecher have to say about the current state of the research on PRP.
Considering that there is constant conversation, and even debate, around which type of mother treads the most difficult terrain, these findings reveal that there is hardly an ocean of difference between both paths.
However, we were told the issues: «were fully debated at our General Assembly last year resulting in the compromise resolution which Mission Council (which represents General Assembly between its biennial meetings) is now required to act on.»
They had been the subject of intense debate between George Osborne and the DWP during the spending review period, which saw the chancellor finally cave in to pressure to allow Mr Duncan Smith to fund the switchover from the current system to the new one.
Third, it was not possible to attain a financial model which ended a system regarded as unjust (quantified as between 7 % and 10 % of Catalonia's GDP, figures that led to the use of the term «fiscal despoliation» in political debates), nor respect for the «ordinal principle» once the territorial transfers have been made.
It was a spectacular end to a legal debate which prompted a legal attempt on Twitter and talk of a constitutional crisis between the legislature and the courts.
During the discussion following his talk, Beck asked the audience who among them had watched the first debate between candidates for the presidency of the European Commission, which had taken place the day before.
Partly because of this absolute rejection, there has not been a serious debate between the pros and cons of independence, which in turn has impoverished and simplified arguments drastically.
Two best political books I read this were «Nixonland» by Rich Perlstein (which covers the eclipse of American liberalism and rise of conservatism between 1964 - 1972) and «The Persistence of Poverty» by Charles Karelis, which is short, witty and will change the way that you think about the whole debate around welfare and poverty issues (get»em on Amazon if they aren't in the shops).
He also took a swipe at the Institute for Economic Affairs (IEA) over this year's presidential debates, which will have an exclusive one between leaders of the country's two major parties, as proposed.
The Speakers» Corner Trust website has been hosting a debate between IPPR and Policy Exchange on the relationship between society and state which resonates with this discussion.
For those looking for more nuance, detail and depth in analysing the changing position of China and Africa in the international system, I recommend visiting the website of the Oxford University China - Africa Network, which I convene and is currently hosting a series of debates between African public intellectuals on what Chinese investment means for local economic conditions from Mauritania to South Africa.
The document, «Briefing On The EU Type Approval Debate» explains the all - important differences between the EU Commission, the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union, and also explains the differences between EU Regulations and EU Directives, an understanding of which is crucial for lobbying to be effective say the BMF.
«There was a strong consensus from the Meeting that it would be better to take some of the heat out of this public debate; this would entail taking forward a calmer internal party review of funding which would be more comprehensive and balanced (including importantly, addressing the Conservative multi-million pound donations at and between elections) and putting that forward as part of Labour's manifesto offer for party funding reforms.»
He wants to turn it into a contest between Scotland and England, which is why he wants a televised debate with David Cameron.
It appears that a relatively small number of people watched the lone debate in the election for New York City Comptroller, which occurred on Tuesday, October 17 between incumbent Democrat Scott Stringer and his Republican challenger, Michel Faulkner.
Compassionate conservatism seeks to change the terms of this debate, by presenting a new and positive vision of society which emphasises these «sideways» linkages between people.