Writing in the Baylor Law Review before the Romer decision, David Smolin of Samford University Law School argues that the present Court» rejecting «religiously based» claims as inherently particularistic» is increasingly dismissing «traditional theists» as too absolutist to join in public
debate in a pluralistic society.
Not exact matches
This observation, of course, brings us to the much -
debated subject of the relation of law and morality and the conundrum of the common good
in a
pluralistic society.
I don't think anyone on the right
in the US
debates seriously against a either having a welfare state, but to perchance its size, or having a secular,
pluralistic society, but rather to freedom of religion.